Matt Ruzicka wrote:
We've got a couple servers that appear to have particularly busy disks
and I was trying to determine if there is a way to more easily poll
this data for tracking.
I'm not sure if this is one of those can't see the forest for the
trees issues or not, but the only means
On Friday 23 June 2006 01:12, Matt Ruzicka wrote:
We've got a couple servers that appear to have particularly busy disks and
I was trying to determine if there is a way to more easily poll this data
for tracking.
I'm not sure if this is one of those can't see the forest for the trees
issues
Thanks for all the input, this puts us on track. Seems like considering
snmp is probably our best bet based on our needs, but these other
suggestions give lots of good info.
Thanks.
Matt Ruzicka - Senior Systems Administrator
Front Range Internet, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (970) 212-0728
On
Matt Ruzicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've got a couple servers that appear to have particularly busy disks and
I was trying to determine if there is a way to more easily poll this data
for tracking.
I'm not sure if this is one of those can't see the forest for the trees
issues or not,
In the last episode (Jun 22), Matt Ruzicka said:
We've got a couple servers that appear to have particularly busy
disks and I was trying to determine if there is a way to more easily
poll this data for tracking.
I'm not sure if this is one of those can't see the forest for the
trees issues
In the last episode (Jun 22), Matt Ruzicka said:
We've got a couple servers that appear to have particularly
busy disks
and I was trying to determine if there is a way to more easily poll
this data for tracking.
I'm not sure if this is one of those can't see the forest for the
