t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: help with webcam through natd + ipfw
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Charles Pelletier wrote:
>
> > question...
>
> > having never dealt with IPFW and nat, does ipnat.conf need to exist? i
> > wonder
OTECTED]>
> To: "Alan McKay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:16 PM
> Subject: Re: help with webcam through natd + ipfw
>
>
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Alan McKay wrote:
> >
> > >
>
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Alan McKay wrote:
>
> > If indeed your internal machine is excepting connections on port
> > 8080 (can be tested from the firewall box using telnet) then this
>
> Cannot telnet to 8080 so it must be nat, but my natd.conf looks good to
> me. dunno what's up. nat itsel
ssage -
From: "Nick Rogness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan McKay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: help with webcam through natd + ipfw
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Alan McKay wrote:
>
> >
>
> sounds like a firewalling problem. Set your firewall type to
> OPEN, reboot and see if it works. If it does, then you need to
> examine your firewall rules better.
Nope, still no go :-(
I'll wait til my buddy is back from vacation as I think he got
it going on his fbsd box
> If indeed your internal machine is excepting connections on port
> 8080 (can be tested from the firewall box using telnet) then this
Cannot telnet to 8080 so it must be nat, but my natd.conf looks
good to me. dunno what's up. nat itself is working otherwise I
wouldn't be talking t
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Alan McKay wrote:
>
> > What does `ipfw -a l` show?
>
> That seems to be the same as "ipfw show", which I used to determine that
> there do not seem to be any 'deny' rules hit. So I cannot really tell
> where those packets are going. I can hit my port 80 from work no
> pr
> What does `ipfw -a l` show?
That seems to be the same as "ipfw show", which I used to
determine that there do not seem to be any 'deny' rules hit.
So I cannot really tell where those packets are going. I can
hit my port 80 from work no problem (www.bodensatz.com), but
8080 no deal. So i
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Alan McKay wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've done port-forwarding before on several different FW/NAT devices,
> but damned if I can get it going on FreeBSD. At first I tried with
> PPP's builtin NAT, and when that failed I switched to natd. I did
> google searches and even searched t
