Re: hosts.allow and ssh problem

2006-05-19 Thread David Kelly
On May 19, 2006, at 8:55 PM, jekillen wrote: I am trying to deny ftp access to my web site from out side. I have two nics on the server and access it from the inside network via one and serve to the public on the other. I tried to write a rule in hosts.allow to deny ftp connections to the

Re: hosts.allow and ssh problem

2006-05-19 Thread Eric Schuele
jekillen wrote: Hello all; I am trying to deny ftp access to my web site from out side. I have two nics on the server and access it from the inside network via one and serve to the public on the other. I tried to write a rule in hosts.allow to deny ftp connections to the public ip address

Re: hosts.allow and ssh problem

2006-05-19 Thread jekillen
On May 19, 2006, at 7:33 PM, David Kelly wrote: On May 19, 2006, at 8:55 PM, jekillen wrote: I am trying to deny ftp access to my web site from out side. I have two nics on the server and access it from the inside network via one and serve to the public on the other. I tried to write a

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-20 Thread Antony M Rasat
Just out of curiosity, why can 'sshd' not be started from the '/etc/rc.conf' file? Sure you can. Just add a line into /etc/rc.conf like this: sshd_enable=YES sshd should be started automatically during next boot. Regards, Anthony M. Rasat PT. Kalteng Pos Press Palangkaraya -

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-20 Thread Jerry McAllister
At Sun, 19 Mar 2006 it looks like Jerry McAllister composed: One doesn't start anything from the rc.conf file - at least properly. Those things get started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d. What goes in /etc/rc.conf are environmental variable settings that those rc.d scripts look at to

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-20 Thread Micah
Jerry McAllister wrote: At Sun, 19 Mar 2006 it looks like Jerry McAllister composed: One doesn't start anything from the rc.conf file - at least properly. Those things get started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d. What goes in /etc/rc.conf are environmental variable settings that those rc.d scripts

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-20 Thread Jerry McAllister
Jerry McAllister wrote: At Sun, 19 Mar 2006 it looks like Jerry McAllister composed: One doesn't start anything from the rc.conf file - at least properly. Those things get started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d. What goes in /etc/rc.conf are environmental variable settings that those

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Chris Maness
Daniel A. wrote: On 3/19/06, Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I see that this host is still making attempts to get into my box. Is there a cron job or something that has to

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Chris Maness
Daniel A. wrote: On 3/19/06, Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I see that this host is still making attempts to get into my box. Is there a cron job or something that has to

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Gerard Seibert
Chris Maness wrote: Daniel A. wrote: On 3/19/06, Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I see that this host is still making attempts to get into my box. Is there a cron job or

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Daniel A.
On 3/19/06, Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Maness wrote: Daniel A. wrote: On 3/19/06, Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I see that this host is still

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Karol Kwiatkowski
Gerard Seibert wrote: Chris Maness wrote: OK, I was able to get to work by just starting out with a blank hosts.allow. Everything is allowed by default, so when denyhosts adds a deny line to the file, it will deny access to that host. Also, sshd can't be started in rc.conf, it has to be

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Wes Santee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: Gerard Seibert wrote: Chris Maness wrote: Also, sshd can't be started in rc.conf, it has to be started in inetd.conf. Make sure you do a /etc/rc.d/inetd restart after you make changes. Just out of curiosity, why can

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Jerry McAllister
--nextPart3654328.GjrC4HtVEj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Chris Maness wrote: Daniel A. wrote: On 3/19/06, Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Jerry McAllister
Chris Maness wrote: Daniel A. wrote: On 3/19/06, Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I see that this host is still making attempts to get into my box. Is there a

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Bill Schoolcraft
At Sun, 19 Mar 2006 it looks like Jerry McAllister composed: One doesn't start anything from the rc.conf file - at least properly. Those things get started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d. What goes in /etc/rc.conf are environmental variable settings that those rc.d scripts look at to determine

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-19 Thread Olivier Nicole
I'm not sure this is correct. If you read sshd(8), you'll see in the FILES section that sshd will read /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny on its own (i.e. it's compiled/linked with libwrap). Looking at /usr/src/crypto/openssh/Makefile.in for the sshd target verifies this. That and sshd

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:12:41PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I see that this host is still making attempts to get into my box. Where do you see this (i.e. logged by what)?

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Chris Maness
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:12:41PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I see that this host is still making attempts to get into my box. Where do you see this (i.e.

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Chris Maness
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:12:41PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I see that this host is still making attempts to get into my box. Where do you see this (i.e.

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:24:40PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:12:41PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I see that this host is still

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Chris Maness
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:24:40PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:12:41PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: My denyhost script is doing it's job by adding: sshd: 62.149.232.105 : deny to the hosts.allow file, but I

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:48:29PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: Sounds like something else is wrong with your hosts.allow then. # Start by allowing everything (this prevents the rest of the file # from working, so remove it when you need protection). # The rules here work on a First match wins

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Wes Santee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Chris Maness wrote: I tried running sshd off of inetd instead of in daemon mode. It still didn't work. here is the file: Notice anything strange about the top? # Start by allowing everything (this prevents the rest of the file # from

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Chris Maness
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:48:29PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: Sounds like something else is wrong with your hosts.allow then. # Start by allowing everything (this prevents the rest of the file # from working, so remove it when you need protection). # The

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 06:01:31PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:48:29PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: Sounds like something else is wrong with your hosts.allow then. # Start by allowing everything (this prevents the rest of the

Re: hosts.allow ?

2006-03-18 Thread Chris Maness
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 06:01:31PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:48:29PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: Sounds like something else is wrong with your hosts.allow then. # Start by

Re: hosts.allow

2005-02-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 23), kalin mintchev said: i have some crap in my log like: Feb 23 16:56:45 bigdaddy named[85641]: client 218.19.160.163#63869: update 'bigdaddy.com/IN' denied Feb 23 16:56:46 bigdaddy named[85641]: client 218.19.160.163#62855: update 'bigdaddy.com/IN' denied Feb

Re: hosts.allow

2005-02-23 Thread kalin mintchev
Feb 23 17:21:05 bigdaddy named[85641]: client 218.19.160.163#64057: update 'bigdaddy.com/IN' denied so i put: ALL : 218.19.160.163 : deny in my hosts.allow but i still get that log piling up Named isn't built with tcpwrapper support; it would probably cause too much overhead.

Re: hosts.allow

2005-02-23 Thread Jeff With
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:20:11 -0500 (EST), kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Feb 23 17:21:05 bigdaddy named[85641]: client 218.19.160.163#64057: no such chances. the machine is not on my local network. on the network where this machine is there is no windows machines. and the

Re: hosts.allow

2005-02-23 Thread kalin mintchev
BIND version 9.x (not sure on the exact version) and up supports ACLs. example named.conf acl china { 218.19.160.163; } ; options { blackhole {china;}; }; thanks ... that looks like a solution... - jeff -- ___

Re: Hosts.allow and netatalk/cups

2005-01-11 Thread Bob Hall
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:37:23PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: To my knowledge, the effects in /etc/hosts.allow are immediate as soon as you save the modified file. And I have been using it that way for many years. No need to killall -HUP inetd, no need to reboot. If after a change the

Re: Hosts.allow and netatalk/cups

2005-01-11 Thread Bob Hall
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:31:47AM -0500, Bob Hall wrote: Three questions: How do I cause changes in the hosts.allow file to take effect without rebooting? Everything I've seen says to restart inetd, but I'm not using inetd. I searched with different keywords and found the answer to this in

Re: Hosts.allow and netatalk/cups

2005-01-10 Thread Olivier Nicole
To my knowledge, the effects in /etc/hosts.allow are immediate as soon as you save the modified file. And I have been using it that way for many years. No need to killall -HUP inetd, no need to reboot. If after a change the service is still not available: - you did not allow the right thing -

Re: hosts.allow Question

2004-08-17 Thread Siddhartha Jain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Long Story wrote: | Hello everyone, | |Because of the MASS failure tries to connect to my server using | random passwords |I decided to allow only my IP to access the server. http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man5/hosts.allow.5.html - --

Re: hosts.allow not always working... misses some IPs

2003-12-03 Thread Jeff Penn
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:54:32AM -0500, Kerry B. Rogers wrote: I received an e-mail with the following header fragment: ===V=== cut here ===V Received: from priv-edtnes11-hme0.telusplanet.net (outbound03.telus.net [199.185.220.222]) by tinkertoys.net (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id

Re: hosts.allow not always working... misses some IPs

2003-12-02 Thread Simon Barner
I received an e-mail with the following header fragment: ===V=== cut here ===V Received: from priv-edtnes11-hme0.telusplanet.net (outbound03.telus.net [199.185.220.222]) by tinkertoys.net (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hANMNpKS021237; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 15:23:51 -0700 (MST) ===^===