Re: image based stock spam

2006-11-13 Thread James Seward
On 11/13/06, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ugh, I'm running a 6.2 prerelease. The package doesn't exist, so I build the port, or try to. The tiff port wont build, so I pkg_add that. It gets a lil further along, the pkgconfig port won't build, I pkg_add that. Then, a little further here

Re: image based stock spam

2006-11-13 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Antony Mawer wrote: On 13/11/2006 12:00 PM, Brian wrote: Looks like the preferred approach many folks re the above problem is fuzzyocr? Since there isn't a port for that, is there another FreeBSD solution worth mentioning here?

Re: image based stock spam

2006-11-13 Thread Armin Arh
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:17:58 -0800 Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ugh, I'm running a 6.2 prerelease. The package doesn't exist, so I build the port, or try to. The tiff port wont build, so I pkg_add that. It gets a lil further along, the pkgconfig port won't build, I pkg_add that. Then,

Re: image based stock spam

2006-11-13 Thread Martin Hepworth
Brian the SARE Stock rules (and others) from www.rulesemporium.com are equally good at catching this stuff, and a lot lot lighter on CPU cycles. -- Martin On 11/13/06, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like the preferred approach many folks re the above problem is fuzzyocr? Since there

Re: image based stock spam

2006-11-12 Thread Antony Mawer
On 13/11/2006 12:00 PM, Brian wrote: Looks like the preferred approach many folks re the above problem is fuzzyocr? Since there isn't a port for that, is there another FreeBSD solution worth mentioning here? http://www.freshports.org/mail/p5-FuzzyOcr/ --Antony

Re: image based stock spam

2006-11-12 Thread Olivier Nicole
Since there isn't a port for that, is there another FreeBSD solution worth mentioning here? I can't remember if there is a port or not, but I remember it was very easy to install: if fuzzyocr itself is not a port, every tools it is based upon are ports. Olivier

Re: image based stock spam

2006-11-12 Thread Brian
Antony Mawer wrote: On 13/11/2006 12:00 PM, Brian wrote: Looks like the preferred approach many folks re the above problem is fuzzyocr? Since there isn't a port for that, is there another FreeBSD solution worth mentioning here? http://www.freshports.org/mail/p5-FuzzyOcr/ --Antony