-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 3:15 PM
To: Craig Deal; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem
Craig Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 10/18/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/15/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/16/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xorg-libraries,
On 10/16/05, James Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been aware of pkgtools.conf but hadn't buckled down to suss out the
syntax
prior to recently. Thanks to Dru Lavigne's excellent article at onlamp.com,
I'm
working on my first attempt at setting make variables in pkgtools.conf.
First,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 03:29:45PM +0400, Andrew P. wrote:
First, the other syntax seems much more readable:
'mplayer' = [
'WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=yes',
'WITHOUT_RUNTIME_CPUDETECTION=yes',
],
'aumix*' = [
'WITH_GTK2=yes',
],
On 10/15/2005 11:17 PM James Long wrote:
I've been aware of pkgtools.conf but hadn't buckled down to suss out the syntax
prior to recently. Thanks to Dru Lavigne's excellent article at onlamp.com, I'm
working on my first attempt at setting make variables in pkgtools.conf.
First, is there
James Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been aware of pkgtools.conf but hadn't buckled down to suss out the
syntax
prior to recently. Thanks to Dru Lavigne's excellent article at onlamp.com,
I'm
working on my first attempt at setting make variables in pkgtools.conf.
First, is there
On 10/15/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/16/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xorg-libraries, and I then
followed the suggestion in UPDATING to delete
On 10/16/05, Peter Matulis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly guys, what is this thread about?
Hum, understanding something?
You're not gonna make portupgrade work any faster or
smoother if you weed out a couple of switches from the
command-line.
Andrew P. wrote:
On 10/16/05, Peter Matulis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly guys, what is this thread about?
Hum, understanding something?
You're not gonna make portupgrade work any faster or
smoother if you weed out a couple of switches from
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Peter Matulis wrote:
What is the use of specifying the 'r' switch when using the 'a'
switch?
# portupgrade -ar
This says to upgrade all ports plus the ones that depend on all
those ports. Am I missing something? Wouldn't the ones that
depend be upgraded anyway?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Jan Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Peter Matulis wrote:
What is the use of specifying the 'r' switch when using the 'a'
switch?
# portupgrade -ar
This says to upgrade all ports plus the ones that depend on all
those ports. Am I
--- Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But still, a port requires upgrading or it does not. Using 'r',
portupgrade ultimately checks whether some port should be
upgraded.
Are you saying that the 'r' switch involves a different decision
making process than 'a'?
The -a switch will
Peter Matulis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The -a switch will upgrade a port only if its version number has
increased (as you know).
The -r switch will upgrade a port if one of its dependancies has been
upgraded, regardless of whether its version number
--- Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uninstalled dependancies of an installed port are irrelevant in
any portupgrade case, as the port will automatically pull them in
as
part of its compilation.
What if a port now has a new dependency?
But back to 'r',
My system shows this:
On 10/16/05, Peter Matulis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uninstalled dependancies of an installed port are irrelevant in
any portupgrade case, as the port will automatically pull them in
as
part of its compilation.
What if a port now has a new
On 10/16/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xorg-libraries, and I then
followed the suggestion in UPDATING to delete XFree86 the imake-4 packages,
and install the full
--- Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly guys, what is this thread about?
Hum, understanding something?
You're not gonna make portupgrade work any faster or
smoother if you weed out a couple of switches from the
command-line.
See above.
I don't mean to bother anyone if you're
Micah wrote:
Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote:
Hello!
I thought I'd ask you all if my make_ports.sh is as convenient as I think
it is, or if it's totally off track or what not:
# cat make_ports.sh
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile
cd /usr/ports
make fetchindex
portupgrade -raP
portsdb -uU
Not the
Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote:
Hello!
I thought I'd ask you all if my make_ports.sh is as convenient as I think
it is, or if it's totally off track or what not:
# cat make_ports.sh
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile
cd /usr/ports
make fetchindex
portupgrade -raP
portsdb -uU
pkgdb -F
portsclean -CDLP
Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote:
Hello!
I thought I'd ask you all if my make_ports.sh is as convenient as I think
it is, or if it's totally off track or what not:
# cat make_ports.sh
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile
cd /usr/ports
make fetchindex
portupgrade -raP
portsdb -uU
pkgdb -F
portsclean -CDLP
As
Hi,
You may be facing the same problem as I did a few days ago. Please see
my
previous post at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-hackers%40freebsd.org/msg52283.html
for a quick (and dirty?) solution.
Olivier
___
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:48:40PM -0700, paul beard wrote:
I am having some problems with portupgrade. The error message is /
usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:322:in `deorigin': (more
below). I see there have been isolated occurrences of this in June of
2003 and 2004,
On Jul 9, 2005, at 6:01 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING?
The last change I found mentioned the use of libc and the
PORTSDB_DRIVER. I made that change ages ago and have tried the other
variants to get around this.
--
Paul Beard
contact info:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 10:30 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
In all the time of asking for various help and providing
You were lucky, the usual results of being vague with questions are not
generally productive.
It is also polite to thank the poster to the list who actually made the
suggestion that helped you to fix the problem, as well as to let him and
the list know that it did in fact, work.
It is a
On Sunday, 26. June 2005 01:18, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If there was significant product differentiation between xfree86 and
xorg, then there would be a reason to keep both. Right now there is
not and with the difficulty in X development, there won't soon be.
There's already quite a delta on
Warren wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su
pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
After this command that seems to skip ports that fail, what version of
imake-4 and XFree86-4-libraries do you have installed?
Dejan
What ever is the latest version as i did a CVSUP and portupgrade as of 24 June
2005 and the above port is the only one that failed.
--
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
On Saturday 25 of June 2005 15:10, Warren wrote:
After this command that seems to skip ports that fail, what version of
imake-4 and XFree86-4-libraries do you have installed?
Dejan
What ever is the latest version as i did a CVSUP and portupgrade as of 24
June 2005 and the above port
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 4:17 AM
To: Daniel O'Connor
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's
just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the
FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on FreeBSD 5.X
just FreeBSD 4.11
I'm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Linimon
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:25 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 7:45 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
But the plain fact of the matter is that the Open Source community
isn't going to tolerate what xfree86 tried doing, and the users of
open source, which is you and I, are not served by splitting development
between 2 forks of X Windows. The
You can check with pkg_info(1). You should have imake-4.5.0. The
file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/X11.tmpl should include the following:
#ifndef DRMIncludesDir
#define DRMIncludesDir $(XF86OSSRC)/shared/drm/kernel
#endif
If it does not, you should (re)install devel/imake-4 port.
I actually
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:45:45PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead
of complaining about it you need to respond to the realitites.
In general I would rather do that than argue, yes.
make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop
***
On Sunday 26 of June 2005 00:44, Warren wrote:
You can check with pkg_info(1). You should have imake-4.5.0. The
file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/X11.tmpl should include the following:
#ifndef DRMIncludesDir
#define DRMIncludesDir $(XF86OSSRC)/shared/drm/kernel
#endif
If it does not,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Linimon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:51 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Mark Linimon; Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Sat, Jun 25
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Linimon
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:25 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re
I use XFree86 as it was what i was using when i upgraded the machine from 4.x
to use 5.x and i personally prefer it, nothing more nothing less and untill
such time as Xfree86 is no longer maintained willi entertain the idea of
moving to Xorg.
Now may i please be removed from your CC's .. i
-Original Message-
From: Dejan Lesjak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 4:19 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mark Linimon; Warren
Subject: RE: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From
On Sunday 26 of June 2005 01:18, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
On Sunday 26 of June 2005 00:44, Warren wrote:
You can check with pkg_info(1). You should have imake-4.5.0. The
file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/X11.tmpl should include the following:
#ifndef DRMIncludesDir
#define DRMIncludesDir
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 4:26 PM
To: Dejan Lesjak
Cc: Mark Linimon; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Ted Mittelstaedt
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
I use XFree86 as it was what i was using when i upgraded the
machine from 4.x
to use 5.x and i
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 9:33 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If you had mentioned in the beginning that this system was upgraded
from 4 you would have never spawned this discussion. Since you don't
like the discussion perhaps that is a lesson to you to make more
complete questions, no?
Ted
If
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 4:35 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Dejan Lesjak; Ted Mittelstaedt; Mark Linimon
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 9:33 am, Ted
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 9:33 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If you had mentioned in the beginning that this system was upgraded
from 4 you would have never spawned this discussion. Since you don't
like the discussion perhaps that is a lesson to you to make more
complete questions, no?
Ted
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-supp
ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-supp
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su
pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:47, Warren wrote:
Just before doing PortUpgrade before sending the 1st email
Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING?
cant say as i did.
Well that was silly..
Not that I think there is a specific entry in this case but it is a good habit
to get in to..
Do you have the
In the last episode (Jun 09), Tony Shadwick said:
Could someone give me a quick hint on switching from automake14 to
automake19 using the ports tree without wreaking total havock on
dependencies? :)
The numbered auto* ports install into separate directories, so there is
nothing to be done.
On 2005-06-09 11:01, Tony Shadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone give me a quick hint on switching from automake14 to
automake19 using the ports tree without wreaking total havock on
dependencies? :)
If you are asking what portupgrade will do with the installed ports,
then there's
No, I was referring to the fact that I ran portupgrade on automake14 and
it complains and says that it is deprecated and strongly encourages using
automake19 instead. I was curious if I just deleted the automake14 port
and installed automake19 if I would be wreaking havoc on my dependencies
On 2005-06-09 11:14, Tony Shadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I was referring to the fact that I ran portupgrade on automake14
and it complains and says that it is deprecated and strongly
encourages using automake19 instead. I was curious if I just deleted
the automake14 port and installed
In the last episode (Jun 09), Giorgos Keramidas said:
On 2005-06-09 11:01, Tony Shadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone give me a quick hint on switching from automake14 to
automake19 using the ports tree without wreaking total havock on
dependencies? :)
If you are asking what
On 2005-06-09 11:27, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 09), Giorgos Keramidas said:
On 2005-06-09 11:01, Tony Shadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone give me a quick hint on switching from automake14 to
automake19 using the ports tree without wreaking total
I'd try something along the lines of pkg_delete -f kdepim-3.4.0 and its
ilk, then continue the portupgrade.
Anyone else?
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Gareth Bailey wrote:
Hi there,
A power cut interrupted my portupgrade -NRP kde task. I ran pkgdb -Fu as
i thought that it would fix any
Anthony M. Agelastos wrote:
After issuing many make options to mplayer when installing, I noticed
today that it can be updated. If I were to do a portupgrade -arR,
would it remember the various options? I am sure this is a common
question, but I could not find a resolute solution after
You're not doing anything wrong. The pkgdb apparently has some major
differences that is taking a large amount of time to reconcile. I had one
machine that was way behind and took several hours to catch up.
Run pkgdb and go to bed. :) Next day everything should be fine.
On Sat, 28 May
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please pardon the intrusion.
After doing a pkgdb -F, I ran a portupgrade -nP --all
to check my installation. I got a single error:
! multimedia/nautilus-media (nautilus-media-0.8.0_4)
(port directory error).
I am then prompted as to whether I want to delete this
Hello:
Thank you for the reply. You guys are great! After
reading the references below, the error makes sense. It
looks like I should upgrade the Gnome port to a newer
version.
Again, thanks for replying with a useful solution!.
Harold
On Thu, 26 May 2005 08:54:18 +0200, Gregory Nou wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:47:41AM -0400, Eric Sheesley wrote:
I am running Freebsd 5.3 and just did a portupgrade(upgraded php, amavis,
clamav, and cyrus-sasl. When I rebooted apache refused to start. I can get
apache started with no ssl but not with it. I have apache13-modssl
installed.
reports a
core dump.
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 02:38
To: Eric Sheesley
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade breaks Apache13-modssl
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:47:41AM -0400, Eric Sheesley wrote:
I am
Here is the error from the log:
May 21 10:49:30 rogue kernel: pid 69446 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11
(core dumped)
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 02:38
To: Eric Sheesley
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re
what other details I can give besides the messages log
reports a core dump.
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 02:38
To: Eric Sheesley
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade breaks Apache13-modssl
On Sat
Kennaway'; Eric Sheesley
Subject: Re: Portupgrade breaks Apache13-modssl
On Saturday 21 May 2005 10:39 am, Eric Sheesley wrote:
When I did the portupgrade I did 'portupgrade -arR'. Apache fails to
start at boot. If I run it manually with 'httpd' it works fine but if
I do 'httpd -DSSL
- Original Message -
From: Aperez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:23 PM
Subject: Portupgrade problem
Hi
I am having the following problem when I try to upgrade my ports:
portupgrade -arR
cd: can't cd to
On 2005-04-08, Aperez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am having the following problem when I try to upgrade my ports:
portupgrade -arR
cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/multimedia/nautilus-media
Port directory not found: multimedia/nautilus-media
!multimedia/nautilus-media (nautilus-media-0.8.0_4)
Replying to my own message.
For the archives, the problem below was caused because my local cvsup
mirror was not in sync with the INDEX file I downloaded from the main
FreeBSD site. Sorry, should have checked a specific port version
Makefile before posting the question.
Nelis
On Apr 5, 2005
Thanks all for the help, it is working perfectly now!
Rich
RW wrote:
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 10:55, Darksidex wrote:
Richard Danter wrote:
1. If I do portupgrade -rR port it will recompile the new version of
port and related ports as expected but it will also try to compile up
any packages that
On Apr 4, 2005 4:31 PM, Richard Danter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to update my installations of firefox and thunderbird. I
have done this several times in the past with no problems but lately I
get the following errors (see below). Anyone else seeing this? I can
update other ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-04-04, Richard Danter scribbled these
curious markings:
Hi all,
I am trying to update my installations of firefox and thunderbird. I
have done this several times in the past with no problems but lately I
get the following errors (see
Richard Danter wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to update my installations of firefox and thunderbird. I have
done this several times in the past with no problems but lately I get the
following errors (see below). Anyone else seeing this? I can update
other ports just fine...
Thanks
Rich
Well, the
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 10:55, Darksidex wrote:
Richard Danter wrote:
1. If I do portupgrade -rR port it will recompile the new version of
port and related ports as expected but it will also try to compile up
any packages that are dependent. Is there a way to tell it not to
upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Danter wrote:
Hi all,
I have a mixture of ports and packages on my system. Mostly ports, but
since my machine is not all that fast I decided not to compile things
like OpenOffice.org for obvious reasons.
I have two questions about
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Francisco Reyes wrote:
/usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree
Interesting. Thanks! I wonder how that compares to portmanager.
I have never used port manager, but pkg_tree only lets you see a tree of
the ports. It doesn't help you manage them. I don't know if port
On Monday 28 March 2005 06:41, Jay O'Brien wrote:
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot
bone's connected
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:49:11 -0800
Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but
you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
on the various options.
here is an example:
On Sunday 27 March 2005 11:49 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented,
but
you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
on the various options.
here is an example:
#
On Monday 28 March 2005 05:50 am, Randy Pratt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:49:11 -0800
Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
It would be nice if the ports make options were better
documented, but
you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find
RW wrote:
make seach is documented in man ports
It sure is! THANK YOU!
Jay
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Randy, Mike:
Thanks for the explanation. I hadn't considered a dependency
that goes away after the dependent port is built. Now it
makes perfect sense.
Jay
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Alec Berryman wrote:
Thanks for the heads up on 'make search', even if I can't find a complete
description of the command. I find that it is referenced in the manual,
however.
Also check out the port
/usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree
It's very usefull to see
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 06:20:00PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Updating a computer, pkg_info reported I only had two packages,
cvsup-without-gui-16.1h and perl-5.8.5, both of which were out
of date as reported by pkg_version.
I tried to install portmanager, but it was not able to get the
Francisco Reyes wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Thanks for the heads up on 'make search', even if I can't find a complete
description of the command. I find that it is referenced in the manual,
however.
Also check out the port
/usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tree
It's very
Alex de Kruijff wrote:
You told your system to install portmanager and the ports that
it needs, but also all the ports that are based on it. Please
check 'man portupgrade' about the options.
Good point, That is a man page I hadn't thought to review.
Thank you!
Jay
Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800:
Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,
gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If
these all required to make portupgrade or perl work, where is that
reference?
They are required to build and run
Alec Berryman wrote:
Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800:
Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,
gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If
these all required to make portupgrade or perl work, where is that
reference?
They are
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:08:56 -0800, Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alec Berryman wrote:
Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800:
Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,
gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If
these all
Abu Khaled wrote:
ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool are the build dependencies for
cvsup-without-gui.
# cd /usr/ports
# make search name=cvsup-without-gui
Abu, I don't get that result. I only show ezm3-1.2.
# cd /usr/ports
# make search name=cvsup-without-gui
Port:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:27:17 -0800, Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Abu Khaled wrote:
ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool are the build dependencies for
cvsup-without-gui.
# cd /usr/ports
# make search name=cvsup-without-gui
Abu, I don't get that result. I only show
it was said:
If you updated your soirces/ports cvsup then portupgrade did
what you asked it to do. It Updated all outdated
packages/ports
and there dependencies.
I'm convinced that you are right. However, why don't I show the
other dependencies?
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot
bone's connected to the toe bone :).
hth,
stheg
stheg,
Thank
On Sunday 27 March 2005 09:41 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
gettext and libiconv. libiconv depends on libtool...and the foot
bone's
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:51:28 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 27 March 2005 09:41 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
They are recursive dependencies. Check each ports requirements.
cvsup-without-gui depends on ezm3. ezm3 depends on gmake,
it was said:
But how does it work (/usr/ports/Makefile doesn't have a
SEARCH statement) and is it documented somewhere, like in a MAN
page?
The handbook, ΒΆ4.3, mentions 'make search' but doesn't explain
how it works.
Hello,
It uses /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. I doubt the options in there
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but
you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
on the various options.
here is an example:
# all-depends-list
# - Show all directories which
it was said:
I've used portupgrade for a while without really knowing much
about it. I suppose thats a benefit.
However, when it comes to really controlling the portupgrade
processes, I find the man page of minimal use.
Thats becuase the man pages seem to be written for someone who
already
On Thursday 03 March 2005 08:58 pm, Karl Agee wrote:
Here is my tale of woe.
Freebsd 4.11-stable. I upgraded my ports using portupgrade -arR
after cvsuping and make fetchindex and portsdb -u. Things worked, so
I went out and did portupgrade.
But my gnome-2.8.2 install is hosed. It starts
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:58:50 -0800
Karl Agee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my tale of woe.
Freebsd 4.11-stable. I upgraded my ports using portupgrade -arR after
cvsuping and make fetchindex and portsdb -u. Things worked, so I went
out and did portupgrade.
But my gnome-2.8.2 install
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 03:25:20PM -0500, Haulmark, Chris wrote:
Having problems using Portupgrade utilities because of Ruby.
It started last Friday and I waited for the weekend just in case the
cvs tree will get updated with a possible fix.
/usr/ports/UPDATING (and wrap your lines at 70
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:29:51 +0100 (CET), Marco Beishuizen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the
following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]# portupgrade firefox
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..^Cfailed to
501 - 600 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
