Real-Time Video Recording (ionice equivalent)

2010-07-27 Thread Debacker
Hi, I'm looking for a ionice equivalent for FreeBSD. Let suppose that I setup a NAS using FreeBSD. I can substain 50MiB/s writing. Let suppose that I have a 720p security camera, writing at 2 MiB/s in a file. Then I have 10 users copying files around. All of this activity (camera + users) through

Re: Real-Time Video Recording (ionice equivalent)

2010-07-27 Thread Andrew Gould
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Debacker deback...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a ionice equivalent for FreeBSD. Let suppose that I setup a NAS using FreeBSD. I can substain 50MiB/s writing. Let suppose that I have a 720p security camera, writing at 2 MiB/s in a file. Then I have 10

Re: Real-Time Video Recording (ionice equivalent)

2010-07-27 Thread Debacker
Of course, just like you could put real-time processes in one CPU, and normal processes on another to avoid implement complex algorithms. While your solution is pragmatic, I would like to know if there are clean ways to do it. If not, this would be a documented use case to why would anyone

Re: Real-Time Video Recording (ionice equivalent)

2010-07-27 Thread Adam Vande More
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Debacker deback...@gmail.com wrote: Of course, just like you could put real-time processes in one CPU, and normal processes on another to avoid implement complex algorithms. While your solution is pragmatic, I would like to know if there are clean ways to do

Re: Real-Time Video Recording (ionice equivalent)

2010-07-27 Thread Debacker
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Debacker deback...@gmail.com wrote: Of course, just like you could put real-time processes in one CPU, and normal processes on another to avoid implement complex algorithms. While