On 2006-03-02 15:51, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (anyway, it's easier for me now then, since I don't have to manually cut
> the "cc" to the "to"
Some level of attention *is* required, mind you. For instance,
if you see recipients like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
freebsd-questions@fre
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 01:25 -0500, David Scheidt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:50:56PM +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> >
> > Various other mailing lists dictates that posters reply to the list and
> > not the list _and_ the OP.
> >
> > Guess this is different.
> >
> > I still prefer for messag
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:50:56PM +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 03:33 -0500, Parv wrote:
> > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Ow
> > Mun Heng thusly...
> > >
> > > PS : why is it that this list To's the replies directly to the
> > > person answering and cc's the list in
>
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 03:33 -0500, Parv wrote:
> > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Ow
> > Mun Heng thusly...
> > >
> > > PS : why is it that this list To's the replies directly to the
> > > person answering and cc's the list instead of To'ing the list
> > > only??
>
> > The guideline
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 03:33 -0500, Parv wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Ow
> Mun Heng thusly...
> >
> > PS : why is it that this list To's the replies directly to the
> > person answering and cc's the list instead of To'ing the list
> > only??
> The guideline is to copy both the O
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Ow
Mun Heng thusly...
>
> PS : why is it that this list To's the replies directly to the
> person answering and cc's the list instead of To'ing the list
> only??
I notice the same query in one of your previous messages; thought
that by now you would have got a
