On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
On Sunday 24 October 2004 23:00, FreeBSD questions mailing list wrote:
On 24 okt 2004, at 23:57, RedHat Security Team wrote:
Dear RedHat user,
huh?
I thought I ran FreeBSD...
I guess so did I - not really sure that there are any
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Matt Navarre wrote:
Isn't linux_base based on RedHat? There are ls and mkdir binaries in
/usr/compat/linux/bin, I suppose those could be affected by this.
Over on Full-Disclosure they reckon it's a trojan, as it's unsigned and
not in the usual format for such
On Monday 25 October 2004 12:07, Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Matt Navarre wrote:
Isn't linux_base based on RedHat? There are ls and mkdir binaries in
/usr/compat/linux/bin, I suppose those could be affected by this.
Over on Full-Disclosure they reckon it's a trojan, as it's
On Monday 25 October 2004 12:07, Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Matt Navarre wrote:
Isn't linux_base based on RedHat? There are ls and mkdir binaries in
/usr/compat/linux/bin, I suppose those could be affected by this.
Over on Full-Disclosure they reckon it's a trojan, as
[logo_rh_home.png]
Original issue date: October 20, 2004
Last revised: October 20, 2004
Source: RedHat
A complete revision history is at the end of this file.
Dear RedHat user,
Redhat found a vulnerability in fileutils (ls and mkdir), that could
allow a remote attacker
On 24 okt 2004, at 23:57, RedHat Security Team wrote:
[logo_rh_home.png]
Original issue date: October 20, 2004
Last revised: October 20, 2004
Source: RedHat
A complete revision history is at the end of this file.
Dear RedHat user,
huh?
I thought I ran FreeBSD...
On Sunday 24 October 2004 23:00, FreeBSD questions mailing list wrote:
On 24 okt 2004, at 23:57, RedHat Security Team wrote:
[logo_rh_home.png]
Original issue date: October 20, 2004
Last revised: October 20, 2004
Source: RedHat
A complete revision history is at the
Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
On Sunday 24 October 2004 23:00, FreeBSD questions mailing list wrote:
On 24 okt 2004, at 23:57, RedHat Security Team wrote:
[logo_rh_home.png]
Original issue date: October 20, 2004
Last revised: October 20, 2004
Source: RedHat
A complete revision history is at
begin quotation of FreeBSD questions mailing list on 2004-10-25 00:00:56 +0200:
On 24 okt 2004, at 23:57, RedHat Security Team wrote:
snip
Dear RedHat user,
huh?
I thought I ran FreeBSD...
This fake security notice references the GNU fileutils, which are now
called coreutils and
This is a fake!
DONT download the patch (linux users), it is a trojaned version.
Check: http://www.linux.ie/pipermail/ilug/2004-October/019483.html
[logo_rh_home.png]
Original issue date: October 20, 2004
Last revised: October 20, 2004
Source: RedHat
A complete revision
Hugo Silva wrote:
This is a fake!
DONT download the patch (linux users), it is a trojaned version.
Check: http://www.linux.ie/pipermail/ilug/2004-October/019483.html
A complete revision history is at the end of this file.
Dear RedHat user,
Above pipermail tracked down the source location.
Is
11 matches
Mail list logo