Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-14 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:55, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: >> I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others >> as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG >> invokes installation of FF 2.x. >> >> Thi

Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-14 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others > as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG > invokes installation of FF 2.x. > > This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the > inst

Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-13 Thread Kurt Buff
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 15:15, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: >> I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others >> as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG >> invokes installation of FF 2.x. >> >> This fails

Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-13 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others > as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG > invokes installation of FF 2.x. > > This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the > ins

SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x?

2009-09-13 Thread Kurt Buff
I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG invokes installation of FF 2.x. This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the installation of these graphics programs fails. Not a huge deal, but