On 2/25/2012 7:11 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
An email address can be hidden from bots without violating section 508, for
instance:
feenberg is at nber dot org
or some variant won't be picked up by a robot.
Most bots use some rather soph
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
> An email address can be hidden from bots without violating section 508, for
> instance:
>
> feenberg is at nber dot org
>
> or some variant won't be picked up by a robot.
Most bots use some rather sophisticated regexp pattern
matching no
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/25/12 12:03, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Dave wrote:
Those address links need changing to graphic's, so that most address
harvesting bots won't get anything usable.
Mk1 eyeball can still see what's what, but if you have t
On 02/25/12 12:03, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Dave wrote:
Those address links need changing to graphic's, so that most address
harvesting bots won't get anything usable.
Mk1 eyeball can still see what's what, but if you have to use the info,
you have to re-type it m
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Dave wrote:
> Those address links need changing to graphic's, so that most address
> harvesting bots won't get anything usable.
>
> Mk1 eyeball can still see what's what, but if you have to use the info,
> you have to re-type it manually.
I really don't recommend
On 02/24/12 20:42, Dave wrote:
On 24 Feb 2012 at 17:28, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 24 February 2012 17:10:21 Dave wrote:
Can I please request, you all check your mail client "reply to"
settings.
I think, some - like me too - reply here always to all.
Many of the "replies" to this
On 24 Feb 2012 at 12:37, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Dave" writes:
> > Also, just where did he originaly harvest all those addresses from,
> > are they publicly available, or is there a gaping hole in some
> > server somewhere.
>
> It is public information:
>
> http://www.freebsd. org/doc/en_ U
Hi,
On Friday 24 February 2012 17:10:21 Dave wrote:
> Can I please request, you all check your mail client "reply to" settings.
I think, some - like me too - reply here always to all.
>
> Many of the "replies" to this thread, have also been sent to the 388 (was
> it) addresses in the original T
=?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= wrote:
> "Dave" writes:
> > Also, just where did he originaly harvest all those addresses from, are
> > they publicly available, or is there a gaping hole in some server
> > somewhere.
>
> It is public information:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO88
"Dave" writes:
> Also, just where did he originaly harvest all those addresses from, are
> they publicly available, or is there a gaping hole in some server
> somewhere.
It is public information:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/staff-committers.html
DES
--
Da
On 24 Feb 2012 at 17:28, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 24 February 2012 17:10:21 Dave wrote:
> > Can I please request, you all check your mail client "reply to"
> > settings.
>
> I think, some - like me too - reply here always to all.
> >
> > Many of the "replies" to this thread, h
Can I please request, you all check your mail client "reply to" settings.
Many of the "replies" to this thread, have also been sent to the 388 (was
it) addresses in the original To: field, as well as the list.
Might the list settings need tweaking a bit?
Also, just where did he originaly harves
12 matches
Mail list logo