On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/25/12 12:03, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Daved...@g8kbv.demon.co.uk wrote:
Those address links need changing to graphic's, so that most address
harvesting bots won't get anything usable.
Mk1 eyeball can still see what's
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org wrote:
An email address can be hidden from bots without violating section 508, for
instance:
feenberg is at nber dot org
or some variant won't be picked up by a robot.
Most bots use some rather sophisticated regexp pattern
On 2/25/2012 7:11 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Feenbergfeenb...@nber.org wrote:
An email address can be hidden from bots without violating section 508, for
instance:
feenberg is at nber dot org
or some variant won't be picked up by a robot.
Most bots
Can I please request, you all check your mail client reply to settings.
Many of the replies to this thread, have also been sent to the 388 (was
it) addresses in the original To: field, as well as the list.
Might the list settings need tweaking a bit?
Also, just where did he originaly harvest
On 24 Feb 2012 at 17:28, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 24 February 2012 17:10:21 Dave wrote:
Can I please request, you all check your mail client reply to
settings.
I think, some - like me too - reply here always to all.
Many of the replies to this thread, have also been
Dave d...@g8kbv.demon.co.uk writes:
Also, just where did he originaly harvest all those addresses from, are
they publicly available, or is there a gaping hole in some server
somewhere.
It is public information:
=?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= wrote:
Dave d...@g8kbv.demon.co.uk writes:
Also, just where did he originaly harvest all those addresses from, are
they publicly available, or is there a gaping hole in some server
somewhere.
It is public information:
Hi,
On Friday 24 February 2012 17:10:21 Dave wrote:
Can I please request, you all check your mail client reply to settings.
I think, some - like me too - reply here always to all.
Many of the replies to this thread, have also been sent to the 388 (was
it) addresses in the original To:
On 24 Feb 2012 at 12:37, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Dave d...@g8kbv.demon.co.uk writes:
Also, just where did he originaly harvest all those addresses from,
are they publicly available, or is there a gaping hole in some
server somewhere.
It is public information:
http://www.freebsd.
On 02/24/12 20:42, Dave wrote:
On 24 Feb 2012 at 17:28, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 24 February 2012 17:10:21 Dave wrote:
Can I please request, you all check your mail client reply to
settings.
I think, some - like me too - reply here always to all.
Many of the replies to this
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Dave d...@g8kbv.demon.co.uk wrote:
Those address links need changing to graphic's, so that most address
harvesting bots won't get anything usable.
Mk1 eyeball can still see what's what, but if you have to use the info,
you have to re-type it manually.
I
On 02/25/12 12:03, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Daved...@g8kbv.demon.co.uk wrote:
Those address links need changing to graphic's, so that most address
harvesting bots won't get anything usable.
Mk1 eyeball can still see what's what, but if you have to use the info,
12 matches
Mail list logo
