Re: Sendmail/wrappers question

2003-08-06 Thread Stephen Hovey
> > http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-questions_2003/msg23474.html > > And be aware that there are quite a few legitimate small servers out > there that _don't_ have a reverse DNS set up.. However, having said > that, the rules block a *LOT* of spam from China and Korea. > Well I no

Re: Sendmail/wrappers question

2003-08-04 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:15:22PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 05:09:56PM -0400, Stephen Hovey wrote: > > > > whats the surest way to prevent mail hosts with no reverse dns from being > > able to connect/send email? > > > > The hosts.allow example seem more accurately i

Re: Sendmail/wrappers question

2003-08-04 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 05:09:56PM -0400, Stephen Hovey wrote: > > whats the surest way to prevent mail hosts with no reverse dns from being > able to connect/send email? > > The hosts.allow example seem more accurately ident'ing and refusing than > check there is a reverse dns. > > Any insight

Sendmail/wrappers question

2003-08-04 Thread Stephen Hovey
whats the surest way to prevent mail hosts with no reverse dns from being able to connect/send email? The hosts.allow example seem more accurately ident'ing and refusing than check there is a reverse dns. Any insight is appreciated! :) ___ [EMAIL PROT