es transferred in 1.031497 secs (10165575 bytes/sec)
>
> The (valid, IMHO) reason for using disk images is that you want to
> investigate a copy of the data, so you cannot accidentily destroy the
> original data.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Undelet
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:17:31PM -0700, jaymax wrote:
>
> Thanks Roland,
> smartctl showed disk to be fine!
> fls requires a disk image, is there one created by default in FreeBSD 6.0 .
No, you have to create one.
> Running fls in directory of deleted files/dir produced
>
> > #fls -adr 2
>
#x27;t a hardware malfunction. If it is a hardware malfunction,
> the
> disk is dying and should be replaced ASAP.
>
> If the hardware is OK, try fls from sysutils/sleuthkit. As long as the
> data
> isn't overwritten, it should still be there.
>
> Roland
>
--
View
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:37:34PM -0700, jaymax wrote:
>
> I seemed to have lost some critical dump files during a restore. The
> directory in which they were backed up in seemed to vaporize. The data was
> present as indicated by df -h but the directory was not listed.
> fsck on the disk was ine
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Undelete-or-recover-from-badblocks-on-disks-tp25498179p25498179.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
