On Tuesday 29 November 2005 20:52, Vizion wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 12:02, the author RW contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: Upgrading to 60 question.:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:53, Vizion wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:16, the author RW contributed to the
dialogue
Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am currently running 5.3 and want to upgrade to 6.00.
Is there any reason that I should upgrade to 5.4 before upgrading to 6.00?
Not according to the Release Notes. If you were running anything
earlier than 5.3, you would, but 5.3 should be fine to make
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
The ports will continue to work, but you should update them when you
get a chance so that they link against the 6.0 libraries instead of
the old ones.
One exception is nvidia-driver, you must remove the driver from loader.conf
and
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:16, the author RW contributed to the dialogue
on-
Re: Upgrading to 60 question.:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
The ports will continue to work, but you should update them when you
get a chance so that they link against the 6.0
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:53, Vizion wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:16, the author RW contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: Upgrading to 60 question.:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
The ports will continue to work, but you should update them when you
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 12:02, the author RW contributed to the dialogue
on-
Re: Upgrading to 60 question.:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:53, Vizion wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:16, the author RW contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: Upgrading to 60 question.:
On Tuesday 29
I am currently running 5.3 and want to upgrade to 6.00.
Is there any reason that I should upgrade to 5.4 before upgrading to 6.00?
I show below the output from dmesg.boot and from pkg_info from which you will
see that I have a large number of installed ports so it is no light task if I
need
