Andrew wrote:
It's my understanding that if there is more than one instance of a
specific application running, then portions of the code are shared in
memory. I would assume that would apply to dynamically linked
applications as well; i.e. if two different applications are linked
against the
Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'm a bit fuzzy on some of the details, so take it easy. ;-)
It's my understanding that if there is more than one instance of a
specific application running, then portions of the code are shared in
memory. I would assume that would apply to dynamically
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 07:45 -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Andrew wrote:
It's my understanding that if there is more than one instance of a
specific application running, then portions of the code are shared in
memory. I would assume that would apply to dynamically linked
applications as well;
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 10:01 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'm a bit fuzzy on some of the details, so take it easy. ;-)
It's my understanding that if there is more than one instance of a
specific application running, then portions of the code are shared in
It's my understanding that if there is more than one instance of a
specific application running, then portions of the code are shared in
memory. I would assume that would apply to dynamically linked
applications as well; i.e. if two different applications are linked
against the same library, the
On Sun, 14 May 2006 22:14:31 -0500 (CDT)
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of using mount_nullfs(8) to provide read-only mounts
for all the executables in each jail. I've been doing some reading,
'man rtld(1)', and it seems that the linker will take of sharing
Ok, I'm a bit fuzzy on some of the details, so take it easy. ;-)
It's my understanding that if there is more than one instance of a
specific application running, then portions of the code are shared in
memory. I would assume that would apply to dynamically linked
applications as well; i.e. if two
