Le Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:54:45 -0700,
Yuri y...@rawbw.com a écrit :
RELENG_9 is supposed to represent the latest branch of 9.1. De facto,
code says it is PRERELEASE (sys/conf/newvers.sh).
But freebsd.org on its front page says 9.1 is at RC-2.
So how can I get RC-2 through cvsup except through
On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1
Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as stable 9.X branch, why then
9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC?
This looks strange to me.
Yuri
Yuri yuri at rawbw.com writes:
On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1
Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as stable 9.X branch, why then
9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC?
Le Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:48:19 -0700,
Yuri y...@rawbw.com a écrit :
RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1
Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as stable 9.X branch, why then
9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than
RC? This looks strange
RELENG_9 is supposed to represent the latest branch of 9.1. De facto,
code says it is PRERELEASE (sys/conf/newvers.sh).
But freebsd.org on its front page says 9.1 is at RC-2.
So how can I get RC-2 through cvsup except through RELENG_9 which gives
PRERELEASE ?
Yuri
