On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:25:00AM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Why isn't there a /dev/one device to provide an infinite number of
all-ones bytes?
And what about /dev/fortytwo? This is IMPORTANT.
mf
--
What do you care what other people think?
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:10:46PM +0100, Michal F. Hanula wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:25:00AM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Why isn't there a /dev/one device to provide an infinite number of
all-ones bytes?
And what about /dev/fortytwo? This is IMPORTANT.
You can get that with with
Why isn't there a /dev/one device to provide an infinite number of
all-ones bytes?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
At 03:25 PM 1/30/03, you wrote:
Why isn't there a /dev/one device to provide an infinite number of
all-ones bytes?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Sounds OK. As I've asked in a separate question to the list, would
On 2003-01-30 00:25, Darren Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why isn't there a /dev/one device to provide an infinite number of
all-ones bytes?
Because it's easy to get any sequence of equal bytes by using just
/dev/zero and tr(1). Try this command and check the output of hd(1)
:-)
$
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-01-30 00:25, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Why isn't there a /dev/one device to provide an infinite number of
all-ones bytes?
Because it's easy to get any sequence of equal bytes by using just
/dev/zero and tr(1). Try this command and check the output of hd(1)
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-01-30 00:25, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Why isn't there a /dev/one device to provide an infinite number of
all-ones bytes?
Because it's easy to get any sequence of equal bytes by using just
/dev/zero and
On 2003-01-30 17:22, Roger Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I've asked in a separate question to the list, would adding
/usr/X11R6/bin to the PATH statement in /etc/rc be a Bad Idea (tm)?
Yes, it would be a bad idea.
Is there need for anything under /usr/X11R6/bin while booting the
system?
On 2003-01-30 16:13, Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:53:05AM +, Jan Grant typed:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-01-30 00:25, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Why isn't there a /dev/one device to provide an infinite number
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:53:05AM +, Jan Grant typed:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-01-30 00:25, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Why isn't there a /dev/one device to provide an infinite number of
all-ones bytes?
Because it's easy
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
And while you're at it, what about /dev/yes and /dev/no to automate
interactive scripts. Or, if you like the challenge, a /dev/fibonacci
and a /dev/pi would be very welcome :)
Yes, but is /dev/pi a suitable substite for /dev/random
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
And while you're at it, what about /dev/yes and /dev/no to automate
interactive scripts. Or, if you like the challenge, a /dev/fibonacci
and a /dev/pi would be very welcome :)
Yes, but is
12 matches
Mail list logo
