On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:51:33 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 09/02/2012 03:21 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
My standard-
supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says
'tag=RELENG_9'.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
RELENG_9
[ Walter Hurry wrote on Sun 2.Sep'12 at 13:19:44 + ]
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:51:33 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 09/02/2012 03:21 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
My standard-
supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says
'tag=RELENG_9'.
On 09/02/12 16:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
Thanks for the reply. No, I haven't rebuilt kernel and world, nor do I
intend to for the moment. I'm happy to stick with generic.
By using the RELENG_9 tag, you're tracking the STABLE development
branch. By pulling in the sources for the STABLE development
On 02/09/2012 14:33, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
To have the 9.1-RC1 source code, use the stable-supfile in
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/ and build world and kernel using that
source tree. That will give you a 9.1-RC1 system. So that would be a
RELENG_9 tag if you look in that stable-supfile. Then,
I am having trouble with virtualbox-ose-additions. This is 9.1-RC1 on
amd64 in a VirtualBox VM.
It builds from the port (DISTVERSION= 4.1.20), but on reboot, the kernel
module refuses to load,, complaining of a version mismatch with the
kernel.
When I install the binary version (4.1.18) using
On 09/02/2012 03:21 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
My standard-
supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says
'tag=RELENG_9'.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
RELENG_9
The line of development for FreeBSD-9.X, also known as FreeBSD
