Re: ZFS scheduling

2010-04-27 Thread Anselm Strauss
On 04/26/10 00:03, Dan Naumov wrote: Hi, I noticed that my system gets very slow when I'm doing some simple but intense ZFS operations. For example, I move about 20 Gigabytes of data from one data set to another on the same pool, which is a RAIDZ of 3 500 GB SATA disks. The operations itself

Re: ZFS scheduling

2010-04-26 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
On Sunday 25 April 2010 23:03:53 Dan Naumov wrote: In regards to vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending - I seem to recall it is set to 35 to avoid using up all bandwidth in the IO subsystem - would it not make more sense to match the NCQ/TCQ values as default? E.g. 32 or lower for AHCI - don't know what

ZFS scheduling

2010-04-25 Thread Anselm Strauss
Hi, I noticed that my system gets very slow when I'm doing some simple but intense ZFS operations. For example, I move about 20 Gigabytes of data from one data set to another on the same pool, which is a RAIDZ of 3 500 GB SATA disks. The operations itself runs fast, but meanwhile other things get

RE: ZFS scheduling

2010-04-25 Thread Dan Naumov
Hi, I noticed that my system gets very slow when I'm doing some simple but intense ZFS operations. For example, I move about 20 Gigabytes of data from one data set to another on the same pool, which is a RAIDZ of 3 500 GB SATA disks. The operations itself runs fast, but meanwhile other things get