allow to allow access
and the text in between should make sure that the file ssh-connections is
being updated.
The file already exists, i used root access to create it.
But it does not work as expected.
Could you please point me where i did it wrong.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best regards
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:36 AM, aurikus grande auri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
just a few days ago i setup my first FreeBSD server, so i am new to this
OS.
I already tried to find the information i was looking for, but to no luck.
I try to add a line in /etc/hosts.allow which would allow
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:57 PM, aurikus grande auri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rick,
sorry that i did not reply to all, from now on i will use reply to all.
Thanks for pointing it out.
I will also open port 80 for web access, but i do not want to log those.
Because i expect a huge amount
Hello Rick,
sorry that i did not reply to all, from now on i will use reply to all.
Thanks for pointing it out.
I will also open port 80 for web access, but i do not want to log those.
Because i expect a huge amount of traffic on my server.
So i only want to log successfull and unsuccessfull
attempts to your host. The
above line in syslog.conf accomplishes this by sending the message to
/var/log/auth.log.
TCPWrappers will have no effect on logging of failed ssh attempts unless
sshd is configured to run via inetd.
I recommend pf or ipfw for filtering access to ssh.
--
Take care
Rick
On 16/09/2013 14:36, aurikus grande wrote:
I try to add a line in /etc/hosts.allow which would allow and log all
attempts using SSH (sshd).
Actually, by default all logins via ssh are already logged to
/var/log/auth.log
Verb. Sap. tcpwrappers are mostly a lot less useful than they appear to
.
So there are 2 separate files. I would like to have all sshd access
attempts in one single file - regardless if they are successfull or
unsuccessfull.
Quotation: I believe FreeBSD defaults to failed ssh authentication is
logged to /var/log/messages while successful authentication is written
, and as you mentioned in your previous update, it logs the success
login (only). Unsuccessfull attempts are being sent to /var/log/messages .
So there are 2 separate files. I would like to have all sshd access
attempts in one single file - regardless if they are successfull or
unsuccessfull
Not really a FreeBSD problem; however, I was wondering if anyone else
had been unable to access http://sane-project.org/ in the last 24 hours?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 06:58-0400, Jerry wrote:
Not really a FreeBSD problem; however, I was wondering if anyone else
had been unable to access http://sane-project.org/ in the last 24 hours?
Confirmed inaccessible at work, both when URL was fed directly to my
web browser and through the use
On Thursday 01 Aug 2013 11:58:01 Jerry wrote:
Not really a FreeBSD problem; however, I was wondering if anyone else
had been unable to access http://sane-project.org/ in the last 24 hours?
http://www.isup.me/ is a useful site for instantly checking this sort of
thing.
--
Mike Clarke
The courier documentation says this about using enhanced idle over NFS
FAM (but not Gamin) also works with NFS filesystems. On NFS clientsfam
transparently forwards file monitoring requests to a peer famprocess on
the NFS server.
Do you have a peer fam process on the NFS server?
On 07/09/13 21:56, Mark Felder wrote:
The courier documentation says this about using enhanced idle over NFS
FAM (but not Gamin) also works with NFS filesystems. On NFS
clientsfam transparently forwards file monitoring requests to a peer
famprocess on the NFS server.
Do you have a peer fam
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:00:22 -0500, R Skinner
ro...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
No, I don't. But then it was something I thought might help the
situation and another feature to start playing with. Bit of a stretch
really... but I was getting desperate.
Would that have anything to do
On 07/09/13 23:05, Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:00:22 -0500, R Skinner
ro...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
No, I don't. But then it was something I thought might help the
situation and another feature to start playing with. Bit of a stretch
really... but I was getting
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:23:05 -0500, R Skinner
ro...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
Ok. I'll give it a try.
But why would it work with the NFS server - before the repair and
without FAM - and not now?
Oh, I misunderstood. I thought you weren't having problems until you
turned on that
I'm really tearing my hair out here, this was working until I had to do
a repair on the server hdd and rebuild it, and now I cannot work out why
this has been working at all- no amount of googling even hints at what
could be wrong.
I'm trying to access shared folders on a courier-imap server
I am looking for a program that watches login attempts (mail and ssh
login) and blocks the ip address after xx failed attempts.
Currently I am using ipfw - might be great if that program works with
ipw too...
Thanks,
Jos Chrispijn
___
Jos Chrispijn writes:
I am looking for a program that watches login attempts (mail and
ssh login) and blocks the ip address after xx failed attempts.
Currently I am using ipfw - might be great if that program works
with ipw too...
Don't know about mail, but security/denyhosts
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
I am looking for a program that watches login attempts (mail and ssh login)
and blocks the ip address after xx failed attempts.
Currently I am using ipfw - might be great if that program works with ipw
too...
security/sshguard. There are subports for
Jos Chrispijn wrote:
I am looking for a program that watches login attempts (mail and ssh
login) and blocks the ip address after xx failed attempts. Currently
I am using ipfw - might be great if that program works with ipw too...
fail2ban
___
All,
Thanks for the replies, I will check them out!
best regards,
Jos Chrispijn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
You could also use grok
(https://code.google.com/p/semicomplete/wiki/Grok also in ports) to
watch the logs and perform actions based on them.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jos Chrispijn j...@webrz.net wrote:
All,
Thanks for the replies, I will check them out!
best regards,
Jos
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the attempted user name, not the IP of origin.
--
On Jun 4, 2013 9:00 AM, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the attempted user name, not
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:47:16 -0500, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the attempted user
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the attempted user name,
On 06/04/2013 04:51 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall?
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 06/04/2013 04:51 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so
iProfile launches 'TalentSpa' - access to over 2 million CV’s
iProfile, Europe’s largest CV exchange of over 7 million candidate has
launched TalentSpa, a continuously updating source of more than 2
million CV’s.
Make more placements through our huge source of unique
hi sam
i do not know what is the exactly correct manner in freebsd, but it think
based on definition for NAT, you should not be able to access inside
systems from outside unless you have port direction.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:35 AM, s m sam.gh1...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks Danny, but i'm
thanks Danny, but i'm using pf to define rules and pfctl to apply them.
first of all it is so important for me to understand what should
exactly happen and what is the correct behavior in freebsd. i mean
when i define nat from inside to outside, should outside system can
access inside systems
:192.168.2.1
is it a correct behavior or not? and if it is correct, it means that when i
configure to nat traffic from inside to outside, i can not access from
outside to inside systems? (in cisco router packets are exactly as mention
above, but outside system identifies reply packets and therefore accepts
On 4/04/2013 6:41 PM, s m wrote:
request packets: src:192.168.2.1 dst: 192.168.1.1
reply packets: src: 192.168.2.50 dst:192.168.2.1
This sort of thing tends to happen when the the packets are not being
sent via divert socket properly.
Look carefully, step by step, at your ipfw
not read it.But think it was reading monitor.
Now I can not access any account.wrong password message appears after typing
the password.
Thanks in advance.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On 12/21/12 21:12, dweimer wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has used FreeBSD (or NanoBSD) on any small form
factor broads such as PC Engines Alix, or similar hardware. And how
well it has worked for them, and what hardware they used.
I have been having a lot of performance issues with my home
Just wondering if anyone has used FreeBSD (or NanoBSD) on any small
form factor broads such as PC Engines Alix, or similar hardware. And
how well it has worked for them, and what hardware they used.
I have been having a lot of performance issues with my home wireless,
and am considering
Not familiar with it my self but soekris
http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0oGkkuf1tRQfAUASA5XNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTE1aTNzamNlBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkA1JDRjAzOF8yMzU-/SIG=117fj2pvu/EXP=1356154655/**http%3a//soekris.com/
are embedded systems with BSD in mind.
On 12/21/2012 3:12 PM,
Maybe the pfSense project might have some useful info for you.
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Is_there_a_Compact_Flash,_embedded_hardware,_or_Soekris_or_ALIX_version_of_pfSense%3F
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Derek Funk dfu...@cox.net wrote:
Not familiar with it my self but soekris
amount of wi-fi at clients'
sites. The access points we like are Pakedge brand. These are solid,
high-powered industrial-grade equipment, and in your price range. For
what it's worth.
--
Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org
** [ Busy Expunging
to the
problem... At my work we deploy a fair amount of wi-fi at clients'
sites. The access points we like are Pakedge brand. These are solid,
high-powered industrial-grade equipment, and in your price range. For
what it's worth.
I will look into those, currently running UniFi, worked out great
FreeBSD
on something like Alix, left out the as an access point that I was
thinking. I have a pfSense system running on an Alix board as my
Router/Firewall, incredibly happy with it, but already using a Soekris
VPN1411: Crypto accelerator in the miniPCI slot to help out with my
IPSec tunnel
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:10:42 -0600
dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
I will look into those, currently running UniFi, worked out great at
first, but struggling now, can only get 1-3Mbps download, yet 50-60Mbps
upload.
This seems very, very strange. I've never heard of that problem with UnFi
I managed to shut down a machine with an NFS share before the connected
client was shut down.
Now this client won't shut down. It stands at : All buffers synced.
I suspect it's waiting for the NFS server in order to disconnect.
Is there any time-out I must wait for? Will it help to bring
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu wrote:
I managed to shut down a machine with an NFS share before the connected
client was shut down.
Now this client won't shut down. It stands at : All buffers synced.
I suspect it's waiting for the NFS server in order to
Thank you :-)
I'll study it closer.
/Leslie
2012-11-15 15:15, Adam Vande More skrev:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu wrote:
I managed to shut down a machine with an NFS share before the connected
client was shut down.
Now this client won't shut down. It
Hello FreeBSD users !
How can i access and check packets directly from NIC ?
Regards,
Jack
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
2012/10/31 Jack Mc Lauren jack.mclau...@yahoo.com:
Hello FreeBSD users !
How can i access and check packets directly from NIC ?
Regards,
Jack
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Oct 31 06:29:57 2012
From: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQuNGC0LDQu9C40Lkg0KLRg9GA0L7QstC10YY=?=
core...@corebug.net
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:29:05 +0200
Subject: Re: Access packets directly from NIC
To: Jack Mc Lauren jack.mclau...@yahoo.com
Cc: FreeBSD
I believe that easiest way is using tcpdump.
Also you should specify what you mean by 'accessing packets': is it
the need to view raw packet data, or what? :)
Yes, i need to view raw packets and check their protocol, e.g. whether they are
ICMP packets or something else ...
I believe that easiest way is using tcpdump.
Also you should specify what you mean by 'accessing packets': is it
the need to view raw packet data, or what? :)
Yes, i need to view raw packets and check their protocol, e.g. whether they are
ICMP packets or something else ...
daviddavid
2 262080 3861 3147 18:39:30 no-entry 18:39:30
Semaphores:
T ID KEY MODEOWNERGROUPCREATOR CGROUP NSEMS OTIMECTIME
%
Is this (inability to access IPCS resources properly within a
down-level
fixit
...shows the /mx1/maillog* files all to be 644
If move the jail fixit user from group fixit to group wheel, user fixit
has access to /mx1/maillog* files.
suggestions?
thanks,
Len
--
Regards,
James Edwards
___
freebsd-questions
fixit
...shows the /mx1/maillog* files all to be 644
If move the jail fixit user from group fixit to group wheel, user fixit has
access to /mx1/maillog* files.
suggestions?
thanks,
Len
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
His problem is that there's a corporate reglementation
of what he has to do, which he needs to obey in order to
the only cure for such case is changing a job.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 28/07/2012 11:32, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
His problem is that there's a corporate reglementation
of what he has to do, which he needs to obey in order to
the only cure for such case is changing a job.
A little drastic perhaps? Company policies can be changed[*].
Cheers,
in every shared (used by many people) samba share a directory
Autorun.inf, owned by root with access rights of 700.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
security/dazuko doesn't build on FreeBSD more recent than 8[0], so that's a
non-starter, and it looks as if the FreeBSD zfs implementation lacks support
for the vscan property[1], so using vscan with c
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
FreeBSD doesn't need this as there are no viruses on that system.
And yes, I know that neither FreeBSD nor Solaris are renowned for their
sickly vulnerability to viruses, but we operate in a mixed
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
FreeBSD doesn't need this as there are no viruses on that system.
Well, thanks.
And yes, I know that neither FreeBSD nor Solaris
guidelines which are possibly _impossible_
to instantiate.
My idea for a solution: You can use a file access monitor
(FAM) to detect when a new file enters the system, and then
immediately have it scanned by a virus scanner you have
already installed from ports.
Next issue: You need a virus scanner
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:19:45AM -0400, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
FreeBSD doesn't need
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
FreeBSD doesn't need this as there are no viruses on that system.
Well, thanks.
And yes
On 7/27/12 1:47 PM, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:19:45AM -0400, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning
for a solution: You can use a file access monitor
(FAM) to detect when a new file enters the system, and then
immediately have it scanned by a virus scanner you have
already installed from ports.
Yep - exactly the solution that occurred to me a few minutes ago. A project
for the weekend! Because
current options available to support on-access
antivirus scanning on FreeBSD?
why should it be available when it is not needed?
FreeBSD doesn't need this as there are no viruses on that system.
Ok, this is a bad reasoning.
Thanks, Daniel. I have looked at Kaspersky, and various others
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:52:16PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
FUSE ClamFS
Ah, thanks for that. I'll check it out.
But then, FUSE... ew...
I know. But, if it gets me my workstation... ;-)
Dan
--
Daniel Bye
_
, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access
antivirus scanning on FreeBSD?
why should it be available when it is not needed?
Because the IT policy (currently) requires it. I don't agree with that
policy
-0400, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access
antivirus scanning on FreeBSD?
why should it be available when it is not needed
a FreeBSD box clean and also
protect a whole network-full of Windows clients that access it as a
server from most avenues of infection.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP
On 07/27/12 13:14, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:52:16PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
FUSE ClamFS
Ah, thanks for that. I'll check it out.
But then, FUSE... ew...
I know. But, if it gets me my workstation... ;-)
The wiki suggests that FUSE might be part of release 10:
--On July 27, 2012 11:43:08 AM +0100 Daniel Bye
freebsd-questi...@slightlystrange.org wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
Clamav.
I did some testing several years ago with ClamAV, Sophos and McAfee
(scanning incoming mail
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:02:26AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On July 27, 2012 11:43:08 AM +0100 Daniel Bye
freebsd-questi...@slightlystrange.org wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
Clamav.
I use it on my home mail server
Virus scanning should not be your problem. If the Windows users in the
organization have an antivirus solution there is no need for you to have
one. It doesn't matter if you share files over SAMBA -- when they access
the files their virus scanner will check them
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:10:12 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
Virus scanning should not be your problem. If the Windows users in the
organization have an antivirus solution there is no need for you to have
one. It doesn't matter if you share files over SAMBA -- when they access
the files
I did some testing several years ago with ClamAV, Sophos and McAfee (scanning
incoming mail), and ClamAV was comparable to McAfee in detection rates - over
98%.
i use clamav for mail virus checking and IMHO it is the only place where
realtime virus checking make sense.
some windows users
Hi there
Just hoping I can hear back from someone on the process to unlock one of my
clients accounts with http://freedns.afraid.org/ please.
Her previous web developer is no longer in contact and we need to put in place
some domain redirects and access a mailing list.
I look forward
Jacqueline Parlane wrote:
Hi there
Just hoping I can hear back from someone on the process to unlock one of my clients accounts with http://freedns.afraid.org/ please.
Her previous web developer is no longer in contact and we need to put in place
some domain redirects and access a mailing
On 1 Apr 2012 at 10:21, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday 01 April 2012 08:57:00 Da Rock wrote:
Did they come to your location and run a test to their equipment?
My neighbor had a recent cable outage of an existing cable on our
block that was too low and a moving van hit it.
On 1 Apr 2012 at 19:05, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:50:42 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
Given that the other tech in question asked me to help him, and he
is a Winblows nut like yourself, I think this premise can be
dismissed out of hand. I won't even bother to qualify the rest, I
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:18:19 +0100
Dave wrote:
fbsd8
How do you connect to your TW ISP? Just a Cable modem of some sort,
or is there a Router involved somewhere? It makes a whole world of
difference
If you read the rest of the thread you'll see that that the problem
was solved
On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:32 AM, Dave d...@g8kbv.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 1 Apr 2012 at 19:05, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:50:42 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
Given that the other tech in question asked me to help him, and he
is a Winblows nut like yourself, I think this premise can be
On 04/01/12 14:06, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Erich Dollansky
erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday 01 April 2012 08:57:00 Da Rock wrote:
Did they come to your location and run a test to their equipment? My
neighbor had a recent cable outage of an
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:52:26 -0400
Fbsd8 wrote:
Da Rock wrote:
On 04/01/12 09:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable
system. Having problem connecting to their service. Seems their
dhcp server has an ip address of 10.2.0.1 which is not public
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:35:41 +0100
RW wrote:
The difference here is that the DHCP server is in a different address
block to the DHCP server,
That should be: the temporary address is in a different address
block to the DHCP server
___
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:35 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:52:26 -0400
Fbsd8 wrote:
Da Rock wrote:
On 04/01/12 09:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable
system. Having problem connecting to their service. Seems
On 01/04/2012 14:35, RW wrote:
I had a modem that did something similar, it issued a temporary private
ip address and the replaced it with a routable address.
It's fairly sad that they don't use the officially mandated[*]
169.254.0.0/16 netblock which is what DHCP clients/servers are supposed
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:35:02 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
On 01/04/2012 14:35, RW wrote:
I had a modem that did something similar, it issued a temporary
private ip address and the replaced it with a routable address.
It's fairly sad that they don't use the officially mandated[*]
On 04/02/12 00:59, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:35:02 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
On 01/04/2012 14:35, RW wrote:
I had a modem that did something similar, it issued a temporary
private ip address and the replaced it with a routable address.
It's fairly sad that they don't use
On 01/04/2012 15:59, Jerry wrote:
Mathew, I don't know if it is as cut and dry as that. The OP claimed
That's Matthew with two t's.
that his Microsoft PC connected properly but not his FreeBSD machine.
That, in itself, is certainly not surprising. I have always had better
luck setting up
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 01:27:36 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
Until it loses that configuration and you're expected to delete it
and re-enter the connection details...
Or until elephants fly, or whatever.
Explain why it would be so hard to configure various functions as
file sharing and some of
Well here is the results of my attempts to connect to Time Warner cable
network.
After 4 calls to their call center which was in the Philippines where
all the people just read a scripted answer FAQ and only had the ability
to remotely reset the modem. I finally requested to talk to the top
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:10:52 -0400
Fbsd8 articulated:
Well here is the results of my attempts to connect to Time Warner
cable network.
After 4 calls to their call center which was in the Philippines where
all the people just read a scripted answer FAQ and only had the
ability to remotely
On 04/02/12 02:29, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 01:27:36 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
Until it loses that configuration and you're expected to delete it
and re-enter the connection details...
Or until elephants fly, or whatever.
No. This is the common mantra for any Windows net
On 04/02/12 04:10, Fbsd8 wrote:
Well here is the results of my attempts to connect to Time Warner
cable network.
After 4 calls to their call center which was in the Philippines where
all the people just read a scripted answer FAQ and only had the
ability to remotely reset the modem. I
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:20:02 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
Both networking in FreeBSD _and_ Winblows can be difficult at times.
My point is that Winblows is not some magical fairy that can make
everything better. It doesn't. It quite often gets it wrong, and when
it does its a b**ch to fix-
On 04/02/12 08:41, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:20:02 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
Both networking in FreeBSD _and_ Winblows can be difficult at times.
My point is that Winblows is not some magical fairy that can make
everything better. It doesn't. It quite often gets it wrong, and when
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:50:42 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
Given that the other tech in question asked me to help him, and he is
a Winblows nut like yourself, I think this premise can be dismissed
out of hand. I won't even bother to qualify the rest, I wouldn't want
to ruin your delusion.
No
Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable system.
Having problem connecting to their service. Seems their dhcp server has
an ip address of 10.2.0.1 which is not public routable. I know my
Freebsd 8.2 box functions because it worked fine under att service which
I just
1 - 100 of 1514 matches
Mail list logo
