Joel Rees wrote:
I have two which reliably fail if you put TWO disks on them in a
gmirror
config within minutes of starting a make buildworld.
Pardon the interruption, but is this two drives on one channel?
Two drives can not be on one channel on SATA controller.
Also try Sii3112 Windows
On Wed, August 10, 2005 6:37 am, Dmitry Mityugov said:
There are Maxtor MaXLine II and III, and perhaps several other models,
that are supposed to work 24/7.
Right, i have a dead 250GB Maxline Plus II drive on my desk, only after
about 1.5 years. At least its still on warranty.
It's sad isn't it, Mike..I don't know what the hd manufacturers are
doing to the HD drives..ok, the systems get faster, there's usually bad
cooling unless you build your own system...but even if you get enough
cooling that won't change a thing some hds are prone to die an early
death such as
Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Wed, August 10, 2005 6:37 am, Dmitry Mityugov said:
There are Maxtor MaXLine II and III, and perhaps several other models,
that are supposed to work 24/7.
Right, i have a dead 250GB Maxline Plus II drive on my desk, only after
about 1.5 years. At least its still on
O. Hartmann wrote:
Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Wed, August 10, 2005 6:37 am, Dmitry Mityugov said:
There are Maxtor MaXLine II and III, and perhaps several other models,
that are supposed to work 24/7.
Right, i have a dead 250GB Maxline Plus II drive on my desk, only after
about 1.5 years.
Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2005 19:48 CEST schrieb Unix:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Wed, August 10, 2005 6:37 am, Dmitry Mityugov said:
There are Maxtor MaXLine II and III, and perhaps several other
models, that are supposed to work 24/7.
Right, i have a dead 250GB Maxline
Chuck Swiger wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
[ ... ]
One of my SATA disks, the SAMSUNG SP2004C seems to show errors
during operation (and also showd under 5.4-RELEASE-p3).
Sometimes I get this error:
ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599
while the machine still
On 平成 17/08/10, at 7:36, O. Hartmann wrote:
[...] When is SCSI back for desktops?
I vote for that.
In my opinion, ATA is primarily for home media systems, if that.
Joel Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
digitcom, inc. 株式会社デジコム
Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800
** http://www.ddcom.co.jp **
Joel Rees wrote:
On 平成 17/08/10, at 7:36, O. Hartmann wrote:
[...] When is SCSI back for desktops?
I vote for that.
In my opinion, ATA is primarily for home media systems, if that.
Joel Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
digitcom, inc. 株式会社デジコム
Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800
**
On 8/10/05, Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I thought the WD Raptors were supposed to replace the SCSI for that
purpose. I used to run one in a Powermac and performance wise it behaved
very well, unfortunately I haven't had the chance to test the 30 or 70
GB WD Raptor SATA in FreeBSD..S/ATA
Dmitry Mityugov wrote:
On 8/10/05, Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I thought the WD Raptors were supposed to replace the SCSI for that
purpose. I used to run one in a Powermac and performance wise it behaved
very well, unfortunately I haven't had the chance to test the 30 or 70
GB WD
On 8/10/05, Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dmitry Mityugov wrote:
On 8/10/05, Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I thought the WD Raptors were supposed to replace the SCSI for that
purpose. I used to run one in a Powermac and performance wise it behaved
very well, unfortunately I haven't
Dmitry Mityugov wrote:
On 8/10/05, Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dmitry Mityugov wrote:
On 8/10/05, Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I thought the WD Raptors were supposed to replace the SCSI for that
purpose. I used to run one in a Powermac and performance wise it behaved
On 8/10/05, Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the WD Raptors were supposed to replace the SCSI for that
purpose. I used to run one in a Powermac and performance wise it behaved
very well, unfortunately I haven't had the chance to test the 30 or 70
GB WD Raptor SATA in FreeBSD..S/ATA drives
get this error:
ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599
while the machine still keeps working.
Other days the box crashes completely.
Is this a operating system bug or is this message an evidence of
defective hardware?
You can probably confirm a hardware issue
O. Hartmann wrote:
[ ... ]
One of my SATA disks, the SAMSUNG SP2004C seems to show errors during
operation (and also showd under 5.4-RELEASE-p3).
Sometimes I get this error:
ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599
while the machine still keeps working.
Other
[2295104 x 2048 byte records]
GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider acd0 is iso9660/CDROM.
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad8s1a
pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled
WARNING pid 525 (nasd): ioctl sign-extension ioctl c0106924
ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599
: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599
while the machine still keeps working.
Other days the box crashes completely.
Is this a operating system bug or is this message an evidence of defective
hardware?
You can probably confirm a hardware issue with the smartmon
tools
18 matches
Mail list logo
