ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
That's fine, but you must check the netmask of the interfaces and your computers
in the network, it should be 255.255.0.0.
Aha, that could be the problem then. I'm using 255.255.255.0 currently.
How are you bridging the interfaces ?? i
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 02:12:49AM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that pc1 do the nat for xl0
and wi0 ?
I'm using the NAT on the ADSL
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:12:04PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 02:12:49AM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that pc1 do the
Hi,
I would like to ask for some advice on configuring my home network,
with a FreeBSD 5.1 being the main player. In a nutshell, I want to route
wired and wireless traffic through my FBSD box, do some ipfw, perhaps
IPSec, and some bandwidth shaping, and finally send the traffic out to
the
You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that pc1 do the nat for xl0
and wi0 ?
If you want that pc1 do the NAT, you don't have to bridge xl0 and xl1, you only
have to bridge wi0 and xl1 and do nat betwen them and xl1.
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:06:31PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
Hi,
I
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that pc1 do the nat for xl0
and wi0 ?
I'm using the NAT on the ADSL router, because that's the only public IP
that I have.
--
mike
___
[EMAIL
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 02:12:49AM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that pc1 do the nat for xl0
and wi0 ?
I'm using the NAT on the ADSL router, because that's the only public IP
that I have.
Humm
