Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-30 Thread Morgan Wesström
>> 2) Is there anyway to enable these two options during make without >> editing the Makefile? >> > 2. The easiest way is to set the define upon running make > > [/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp]$ make -DWITH_MFD_REWRITES install clean Thanks Steve, I actually tried that before posting but thought

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-30 Thread Steve Polyack
Morgan Wesström wrote: So I have two questions: 1) Is --with-mib-modules=if-mib already covered in the Makefile? I can see the parameter but it refers to a variable I don't know the contents of. The variable seems to refer to the build option NET_SNMP_MIB_MODULES which is mentioned at the beginn

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-30 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote: > I see now what you are saying: > > # sockstat -l4 > > root     bsnmpd     2857  5  udp4   *:*                   *:* > root     bsnmpd     2857  6  udp4   127.0.0.1:161         *:* > root     bsnmpd     2857  7  udp4   208.70.106.1:161      *

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-30 Thread Steve Bertrand
Maxim Khitrov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> Maxim Khitrov wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Brandon Weisz wrote: I cant speak to the documentation, but this seems to limit it to listening on a single address: Example.. #

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-30 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote: > Maxim Khitrov wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Brandon Weisz wrote: > >>> I cant speak to the documentation, but this seems to limit it to listening >>> on a single address: >>> >>> Example.. >>> >>> # open standard SNMP ports >>>

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-30 Thread Steve Bertrand
Maxim Khitrov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Brandon Weisz wrote: >> I cant speak to the documentation, but this seems to limit it to listening >> on a single address: >> >> Example.. >> >> # open standard SNMP ports >> begemotSnmpdPortStatus.192.168.2.254.161 = 1 > > Thanks, but I tr

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-30 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Brandon Weisz wrote: > Maxim Khitrov wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: >>> MK> I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system >>> MK> parame

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-29 Thread Brandon Weisz
Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: MK> I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system MK> parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious MK> choice to do t

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-29 Thread Morgan Wesström
> net-snmp has no problems providing 64-bit counters (interface and > disk). You must build it with -DWITH_MFD_REWRITES (passes > --with-mfd-rewrites to ./configure). I do not know why this is not the > default. It works just fine. I also have a PR open to make this define > a ports 'make confi

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-29 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > MK> I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system > MK> parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious > MK> choice to do the monitoring an

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-27 Thread Mel Flynn
On Monday 27 April 2009 20:19:33 Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > MK> I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system > MK> parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious > MK> choice to do the monitoring and

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-27 Thread Steve Bertrand
Steve Polyack wrote: > Steve Bertrand wrote: >> Maxim Khitrov wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system >>> parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious >>> choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdto

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-27 Thread Steve Polyack
Steve Bertrand wrote: Maxim Khitrov wrote: Hello all, I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to generate graphs of captured data. The

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-27 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: MK> I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system MK> parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious MK> choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to MK> generate graphs of capture

Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-27 Thread Steve Bertrand
Maxim Khitrov wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system > parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious > choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to > generate graphs of captured data. The question is what

bsnmpd vs net-snmp

2009-04-27 Thread Maxim Khitrov
Hello all, I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to use. I found net-s