Greetings,
My attempts to compile a (5.1-RELEASE) kernel on a very old PC take
around 5 hours (of compile time), while a much faster machine sits by
idle. It would be great to be able to compile the kernel on the faster
machine and transfer it to the older machine.
Would I be correct in
Rowdy told a big fish story including the following on 12/23/2003 1:31 PM:
Greetings,
My attempts to compile a (5.1-RELEASE) kernel on a very old PC take
around 5 hours (of compile time), while a much faster machine sits by
idle. It would be great to be able to compile the kernel on the
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 21:31, Rowdy wrote:
Greetings,
My attempts to compile a (5.1-RELEASE) kernel on a very old PC take
around 5 hours (of compile time), while a much faster machine sits by
idle. It would be great to be able to compile the kernel on the faster
machine and transfer it
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:31:38PM -0800, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
Rowdy told a big fish story including the following on 12/23/2003 1:31 PM:
My attempts to compile a (5.1-RELEASE) kernel on a very old PC take
around 5 hours (of compile time), while a much faster machine sits by
idle. It
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:04:09PM -0800, Sean Ellis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:31:38PM -0800, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
OK, hang on. Here it is in an older handbook I have. Appearing as:
19.4.15.5. Can I use one machine as a master to upgrade lots of machines
(NFS)?, a question at the
Sean Ellis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:04:09PM -0800, Sean Ellis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:31:38PM -0800, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
OK, hang on. Here it is in an older handbook I have. Appearing as:
19.4.15.5. Can I use one machine as a master to upgrade lots of machines
(NFS)?,
