Boris Karloff wrote:
Chris wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Boris Karloff wrote:
Ain't you 'sposed to be dead?!
That's Bela Lugosi...
Actually, so is Boris ---
Bela Lugosi famously died in the middle of filming Plan 9 from Outer
Space (http://www.badmovies.org/movies/plannine
>Chris wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Boris Karloff wrote:
>>
>> Ain't you 'sposed to be dead?!
>That's Bela Lugosi...
>--Alex
Actually, so is Boris ---
My e-mail provider is upgrading the mail server, and
apparently someone either mistyped my name when moving my
account, or one of the employ
Chris wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Boris Karloff wrote:
Ain't you 'sposed to be dead?!
That's Bela Lugosi...
--Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
Boris Karloff wrote:
Thank you for your reply.
Nmap is generating many tcp commands:
arp who-has 192.168.0.x tell 192.168.0.5
where x is an incremented number from 0 through 255. The
192.168.0.5 address changes from scan to scan, so blocking
the port 192.168.0.5 doesn't work.
That's not a
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Boris Karloff wrote:
Ain't you 'sposed to be dead?!
Best regards,
Chris
Fact is solidified opinion.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send an
Thank you for your reply.
Nmap is generating many tcp commands:
arp who-has 192.168.0.x tell 192.168.0.5
where x is an incremented number from 0 through 255. The
192.168.0.5 address changes from scan to scan, so blocking
the port 192.168.0.5 doesn't work.
This behavior is similar to the W32.W
Thank you for your reply.
As you can see from my first message, blackhole did not
work.
Harold
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:36:36AM -0500, Boris Karloff
wrote:
> It appears that when FreeBSD is sent an invalid packet
> without the SYN or ACK bits set, it responds with a RESET
> reply regardless of
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:36:36AM -0500, Boris Karloff wrote:
> It appears that when FreeBSD is sent an invalid packet
> without the SYN or ACK bits set, it responds with a RESET
> reply regardless of the ipfw rules. It appears this is one
> of the things nmap is exploiting.
>
> Any suggestions o
>On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:43:56PM -0500, Boris Karloff
wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>> How do I cause freeBSD 5.4 to not respond to an nmap
>> inquiry? I have already tried creating a line in
rc.firewall
>> that says:
>>
>> ${fwcmd} deny all from any to any
>> ${fwcmd} drop all from any to any
>>
>> I