DEVICE_POLLING IF_EM CPU usage

2008-02-09 Thread Daniel Dias Gonçalves
Hi, I activated polling in 8 interfaces em0... em7 (ifconfig em* polling) to carry through performance tests, when activating, it had a significant reduction of CPU usage, load average measured of 0,50, 0,69, 0,52 for 0,43, 0,39, 0,21 and the CPU usage (SNMP Graphic) measured of 35% for 5%.

Re: device_polling

2005-04-03 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:06:37 -0500 jason henson wrote: dick hoogendijk wrote: I was building a new kernel today and came across an option I had not seen before. I googled some and concluded that options device_polling / options HZ=1000 would be a better way for my realtec network cards

Re: device_polling

2005-04-03 Thread Anthony Atkielski
dick hoogendijk writes: I build a kernel with devoce_polling and hz=1000 and experimented a bit. Using netstat -w 1 I see a drop in performance. In/output is about 20% higher if polling is disabled. That was not what I expexted. I really thought polling would be better. I use cheap rl

Re: device_polling

2005-04-03 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:28:19 +0200 Anthony Atkielski wrote: dick hoogendijk writes: I build a kernel with devoce_polling and hz=1000 and experimented a bit. Using netstat -w 1 I see a drop in performance. In/output is about 20% higher if polling is disabled. That was not what I

device_polling

2005-04-02 Thread dick hoogendijk
I was building a new kernel today and came across an option I had not seen before. I googled some and concluded that options device_polling / options HZ=1000 would be a better way for my realtec network cards than the default interupt driven.. Is this correct?? Would it be better to have

Re: device_polling

2005-04-02 Thread jason henson
dick hoogendijk wrote: I was building a new kernel today and came across an option I had not seen before. I googled some and concluded that options device_polling / options HZ=1000 would be a better way for my realtec network cards than the default interupt driven.. Is this correct?? Would

DEVICE_POLLING vs. SMP kernels

2005-01-15 Thread Lucky Green
I am contemplating using the DEVICE_POLLING kernel option with an fxp NIC on FreeBSD 5.3 using an SMP kernel. /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_poll.c clearly states that DEVICE_POLLING is incompatible with SNP kernels: #ifdef SMP #ifndef COMPILING_LINT #error DEVICE_POLLING is not compatible with SMP

RE: DEVICE_POLLING in 5.3

2004-09-24 Thread Yaraghchi, Stephan
-Original Message- From: Alex de Kruijff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 3:20 AM To: Yaraghchi, Stephan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DEVICE_POLLING in 5.3 On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:27:22PM +0200, Yaraghchi, Stephan wrote: Hi fellows, I'm

DEVICE_POLLING in 5.3

2004-09-23 Thread Yaraghchi, Stephan
Hi fellows, I'm trying to tune network performance of a 5.3-BETA5 box by compiling the DEVICE_POLLING and HZ=1000 options into the kernel. Compilation went fine. I found the usual warning in /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_poll.c concerning device polling in SMP kernels and removed it. To finally enable

Re: DEVICE_POLLING in 5.3

2004-09-23 Thread Alex de Kruijff
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:27:22PM +0200, Yaraghchi, Stephan wrote: Hi fellows, I'm trying to tune network performance of a 5.3-BETA5 box by compiling the DEVICE_POLLING and HZ=1000 options into the kernel. Compilation went fine. I found the usual warning in /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_poll.c

device_polling

2004-09-02 Thread DanGer
Hello freebsd-questions, is the 'xl' network card supported to use the OPTIONS DEVICE_POLLING ? -- Best regards +==/\/\==+ | DanGer [EMAIL PROTECTED] or | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ: 261701668 | | http://ns1.wilbury.sk/~danger

Re: device_polling

2004-09-02 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2004 17:09 schrieb DanGer: Hello freebsd-questions, is the 'xl' network card supported to use the OPTIONS DEVICE_POLLING ? man (4) polling doesn't list the xl driver and the xl manpage also doesn't mention polling so I guess it's not supported. -Harry

DEVICE_POLLING on Intel HT systems

2004-09-02 Thread Juha Saarinen
I tried recompiling the kernel on a 5.3-beta2 box with DEVICE_POLLING enabled. Compilation failed with a message saying DEVICE_POLLING isn't compatible with SMP. Luigi says on: http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/polling/ Why does this code not work with SMP ? It actually might work (if you remove

Device_Polling Network Cards

2004-04-20 Thread Obi Okeke
Does anyone know what network cards can take advantage of device_polling? I already am aware that these cards/drivers can use it, but I am wondering if FreeBSD 4.8/4.9 specifically support more network cards know. Thanks in advance. * dc -- DEC/Intel 21143 and clone 10/100 ethernet driver * fxp

Re: Device_Polling Network Cards

2004-04-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 08:23:09 -0700 (PDT), in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: Does anyone know what network cards can take advantage of device_polling? I already am aware that these cards/drivers can use it, but I am wondering if FreeBSD 4.8/4.9 specifically support more network cards