In a message dated 11/9/04 5:24:53 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not saying that's how it works, but when this thread started, that's how
it was depicted.
It most certainly wasn't. SInce it was me who said that releases are 'points
in time', which is what you have
this somewhere else (was RE: difference between
releases)
Can you please shut the fuck up and mind your own business?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
In a message dated 11/8/04 4:46:24 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, Ive tested our competitions printers. HPs printers are far
better designed than anything else Ive worked with. The point is
programming
and computer technologies are very young fields. Youre
On 2004-11-09 16:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]the difference between having a meaningful, documented release
structure rather than just slapping out a snapshot because its time.
At some point you have to stop working on stuff, hammer out a release, and
then start working again. It
Hi,
At this moment RELENG_5_3 kan be followed to obtain 5.3 release.
Also RELENG_5 kan be followed, will this be for early adopters?
Some day i hope to run a 5.x with the ule scheduler or is ule more likely
to come in 6.x? 5.3 release is fixed and will not contain new things
anymore right? So
On 2004-11-08 11:06, Mipam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
At this moment RELENG_5_3 kan be followed to obtain 5.3 release.
Also RELENG_5 kan be followed, will this be for early adopters?
Some day i hope to run a 5.x with the ule scheduler or is ule more likely
to come in 6.x? 5.3 release is
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Releases are fixed points in time. They are marked on their respective
branch
of development and that's it. A x.y-RELEASE version is effectively a
symbolic
name for a specific moment in time.
Wow, thats
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: difference between releases
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2004-11-08 07:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Releases are fixed points in time. They are marked on their
respective branch of development and that's it. A x.y-RELEASE
version is effectively a symbolic
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Releases are fixed points in time. They are marked on their respective
branch
of development and that's it. A x.y-RELEASE version is effectively a
symbolic
name for a specific moment in time.
Wow,
In a message dated 11/8/04 10:12:47 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Releases are fixed points in time. They are marked on their respective
branch
of development and that's it. A
On 2004-11-08 10:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/8/04 10:12:47 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Releases are fixed points in time. They are marked on their respective
In a message dated 11/8/04 10:49:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How discouraging for you not to understand that.
Its discouraging, because a Release should be a completed set of
features that have been tested and thought to be bug-free
You know that this isn't
In a message dated 11/8/04 10:49:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How discouraging for you not to understand that.
Its discouraging, because a Release should be a completed set of
features that have been tested and thought to be bug-free
You know that this
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:54:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on the release, which should be a known, completed code base.
All part of the experience I suppose.
The whole world is in beta. Get over it.
Only the open-source world.
I notice the same 3 losers
On Nov 8, 2004, at 12:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:54:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on the release, which should be a known, completed code base.
All part of the experience I suppose.
The whole world is in beta. Get over it.
Only the
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Nov 8, 2004, at 12:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:54:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on the release, which should be a known, completed code base.
All part of the experience I suppose.
The whole world is in beta.
Message: 18
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:47:30 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: difference between releases
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:54:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:41:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as open-open source being the only one in beta, I work in
development where our code is closed-source. Even we have to admit that
our releases fit better into the category of BETA than RELEASE.
Which is
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 12:47:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
I notice the same 3 losers answering over and over.
They're probably among the last people who haven't put you on their
kill-list yet. Congratulations, you're on mine now. Goodbye.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 12:58 PM
To: Butterworth, Thaddaeus (Manpower Contract)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: difference between releases
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:41:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as open-open source being
At 01:57 PM 11/8/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the 4 bozos who jump on everything I say will
just cut back on the coffee there wouldn't be so much BS.
In a previous message, you indicated that you were sure some people
found your posts valuable. The point you seem to be missing entirely
is
On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 12:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:41:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as open-open source being the only one in beta, I work in
development where our code is closed-source. Even we have to admit that
our releases
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:41:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as open-open source being the only one in beta, I work in
development where our code is closed-source. Even we have to admit that
our releases fit better into the category of BETA than RELEASE.
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:29:43 -0500 (EST), Jerry McAllister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
My only point was that a Release should not be just another
snapshot, there
should be some plan.
[snip]
It is more than just another snapshot. It is a special snapshot that
has things frozen and tested
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:31:33 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So when will you switch to decaf? Seriously though, in case you didn't
notice this IS an open source discussion list, FreeBSD 5 is not just
another snapshot it has undergone qualification and is in my
In a message dated 11/8/04 4:46:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So we went from three losers to four bozos
Well I had to add you now, didn't I, Mrs. Butterworth? Now this is something
we can discuss. What is more insulting, being called a Loser or a Bozo?
Hello there,
For some people bandwidth is a valuable resource! Can you
please take your discussion somewhere else (e.g. freebsd-chat).
Thank you!
Manfred Riem
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
28 matches
Mail list logo
