On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:30:41PM -0700, Glenn Dawson wrote:
> From the original message:
>
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/ar0s1e248M -278K228M-0%/tmp
>
> This shows that /tmp is empty. If the reserved space was being encroached
> upon, it w
Don't top-post, please.
Lei Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then, my other question is,
>
> If the file space allocation works like Glenn said earlier, how come
> with the exact same files from 2 different installations using the
> exact procedures, can result in different fragmentation?
>
>
Thanks All,
I think Kris's suggestion worked, as when I was rebuilding of the
atacontrol, I remember it failed once, and had a lot of problem trying
to reboot and unmount the /tmp directory.
So after I rebuild the array, somehow /tmp looks clean to the OS, and
didn't get checked.
so somehow the
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:20:12AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the good answers.
> >
> > But can anyone tell me why the capacity is going negative? and not full?
> >
> > > Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> > > /dev/ar0s1e248M -278K228M
This happened, after I tested the atacontrol to rebuild the raid1.
The /tmp partition doesn't have anything but several empty directories created.
and I have the clear /tmp directive in the rc.conf, which will clean
up the /tmp everytime when system boot up.
So that was really wierd. as it never
On 8/15/05, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> As someone mentioned, there is a FAQ on this. You should read it.
>
> It is going negative because you have used more than the nominal
> capacity of the slice. The nominal capacity is the total space
> minus the reserved proportion
>
> Thanks for the good answers.
>
> But can anyone tell me why the capacity is going negative? and not full?
>
> > Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> > /dev/ar0s1e248M -278K228M-0%/tmp
As someone mentioned, there is a FAQ on this. You should read it.
Thanks for the good answers.
But can anyone tell me why the capacity is going negative? and not full?
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/ar0s1e248M -278K228M-0%/tmp
Thanks a lot
Lei
On 8/14/05, Glenn Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:18
At 12:18 PM 8/14/2005, cpghost wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:09:19AM -0700, Glenn Dawson wrote:
> >2. How come /tmp is -0% in size? -278K? What had happened? as I have
> >never experienced this in the previous installs on the exact same
> >hardware.
>
> Not sure about that one. Maybe someone
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:09:19AM -0700, Glenn Dawson wrote:
> >2. How come /tmp is -0% in size? -278K? What had happened? as I have
> >never experienced this in the previous installs on the exact same
> >hardware.
>
> Not sure about that one. Maybe someone else has an answer.
This is a FAQ.
T
At 11:54 PM 8/13/2005, Lei Sun wrote:
Hi,
I know this question has been raised a lot of times, and most of
people don't think it is necessary to defragment ufs, and from the
previous posts, I got to know there are sometimes, disksize can be
more than 100%
But...
I got ...
/dev/ar0s1a: ... 0.5
Hi,
I know this question has been raised a lot of times, and most of
people don't think it is necessary to defragment ufs, and from the
previous posts, I got to know there are sometimes, disksize can be
more than 100%
But...
I got ...
/dev/ar0s1a: ... 0.5% fragmentation
/dev/ar0s1e: ... 0.0% fr
Jim Pazarena wrote:
during the boot sequence, I routinely see a "% fragmentation message".
It was my understanding that fragmentation doesn't occur on a Unix
(er FreeBSD) box..
It seems that there is a concept of fragmentation from the above
message, so, is there an "un-fragment" utility?
Jim
No th
In the last episode (Feb 01), Jim Pazarena said:
> during the boot sequence, I routinely see a "% fragmentation
> message".
>
> It was my understanding that fragmentation doesn't occur on a Unix
> (er FreeBSD) box..
>
> It seems that there is a concept of fragmentation from the above
> message, s
during the boot sequence, I routinely see a "% fragmentation message".
It was my understanding that fragmentation doesn't occur on a Unix
(er FreeBSD) box..
It seems that there is a concept of fragmentation from the above
message, so, is there an "un-fragment" utility?
Jim
_
15 matches
Mail list logo
