Robert Bonomi wrote:
>>From bonomi Wed May 23 03:14:43 2012
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 03:14:43 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
> To: r...@mail.r-bonomi.com
> Subject: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details
>
> This is a MIME-encapsulated message
>
> --q4N8Egh0088941.133776088
>From bonomi Wed May 23 03:14:43 2012
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 03:14:43 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
To: r...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Subject: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
--q4N8Egh0088941.1337760883/mail.r-bonomi.com
The original messa
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 04:38:00AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 04:38:00 +0100
> From: Polytropon
> Subject: Re: Anything like mkmf for foo linux?
> To: Gary Kline
> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:08:41 -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> fwiw,i HAVE PORTED A FEW THINGS ACROSS. dunno what id do w/out the
> src!!
Keep the mkmf source -- seems that is has been removed
from the ports tree.
Port: mkmf-4.11
Path: /usr/ports/devel/mkmf
Info: Creates program and library makefi
i asked the seattle linux group and the mkmf they have on/for ubuntu
was "fine." not by me.
i started to port our mkmf which is non-trivial at best. so:: are
there any other kinds of makefile creators in ports that i can use
on my FBSD server AND SEE IF UBUNTU HAS A SIMILAR PACKAGE?
fwiw,i HAV
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 07:16:01PM +, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 11/25/10 18:22, Gary Kline wrote:
> [Huge snip]
Super :-)
> > What I don't understand is the CF card and howto install
> > pfSense. I'll re-read wherever I have to but some clues would
> > certainly help. I
On 11/25/10 18:22, Gary Kline wrote:
[Huge snip]
What I don't understand is the CF card and howto install
pfSense. I'll re-read wherever I have to but some clues would
certainly help. I installed pfSense by CDROM initially and
figure this time the install would b
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 11/25/10 03:01, Gary Kline wrote:
> >Folks (mostly Adam),
> >
> >Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
> >Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
> >the stuff he installed a few years back
On 11/25/10 03:01, Gary Kline wrote:
Folks (mostly Adam),
Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
the stuff he installed a few years back and now was much better::
ALIX.2D13 system board - $115
CompactFlash card
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:45:41PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > Folks (mostly Adam),
> >
> > Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
> > Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
> > the stuff he in
Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
_thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
[pfSense], but nada.
Any wizards on this list have a clue?
You'd probably have to build one yourself out of
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
> Folks (mostly Adam),
>
> Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
> Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
> the stuff he installed a few years back and now was much better::
>
>
> > ALIX.2D13 system boa
Folks (mostly Adam),
Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
the stuff he installed a few years back and now was much better::
> ALIX.2D13 system board - $115
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:14:01PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> >Anybody?
> >
>
> Gary, in case you didn't catch it the pcengines link already given to you is
> low power setup with comsumption comparable or better than an Atom.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
>Anybody?
>
Gary, in case you didn't catch it the pcengines link already given to you is
low power setup with comsumption comparable or better than an Atom. It's
also been tested with FreeBSD and pfSense according to the manufacturers
s
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:23:33PM +0100, Goran Lowkrantz wrote:
> --On November 23, 2010 17:43:12 -0800 Gary Kline wrote:
>
> >Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
> >typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
> >_thought_ I'd found a computer to re
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
> Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
> typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
> _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
> [pfSense], but nada.
>
> Any wizards on this list ha
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:03:56PM +, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 11/24/10 01:43, Gary Kline wrote:
> >Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
> >typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
> >_thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
>
On 11/24/10 01:43, Gary Kline wrote:
Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
_thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
[pfSense], but nada.
Any wizards on this list have a clue?
I don't kno
--On November 23, 2010 17:43:12 -0800 Gary Kline wrote:
Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
_thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
[pfSense], but nada.
Any wizards on this list have
Bruce Cran writes:
> You also get network cards with multiple ports which would work. e.g.
>
> http://reviews.cnet.com/adapters-nics/d-link-dfe-570tx/1707-3380_7-785663.html
The machine I'm typing on has a two port Intel Pro/1000-GT; I
cannot recommend it highly enough.
One ca
On 24.11.2010 02:43, Gary Kline wrote:
> Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
> typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
> _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
> [pfSense], but nada.
>
> Any wizards on this list have a clue?
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:26:53 -0800
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Dunno about having them on-board, but anything with a Poulsbo SCH
> should have two PCIe channels, each of which could be used for a
> NIC.
You also get network cards with multiple ports which would work. e.g.
http://reviews.cnet.c
Gary Kline wrote:
> I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs.
Dunno about having them on-board, but anything with a Poulsbo SCH
should have two PCIe channels, each of which could be used for a
NIC.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
_thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
[pfSense], but nada.
Any wizards on this list have a clue?
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thou
On Thursday 17 September 2009 19:55:33 Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:14:29PM +0200, Mel Flynn typed:
> > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote:
> > > On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn"
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Co
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:14:29PM +0200, Mel Flynn typed:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote:
> > On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn"
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote:
> > >> Tom Worster wrote:
> > >>> thanks, Mel, that's good t
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote:
> On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn"
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote:
> >> Tom Worster wrote:
> >>> thanks, Mel, that's good to know.
> >>>
> >>> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will tur
Tom Worster wrote:
> On 9/16/09 3:19 PM, "Matthew Seaman"
> wrote:
>
>> Tom Worster wrote:
>>> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
>>> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
>> I
On 9/16/09 3:19 PM, "Matthew Seaman"
wrote:
> Tom Worster wrote:
>> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
>> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
>
> If you're starting service foo,
Tom Worster wrote:
is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
If you're starting service foo, then you should be able to define command
arguments by setting foo_flags="-a -b
On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn"
wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote:
>> Tom Worster wrote:
>>> thanks, Mel, that's good to know.
>>>
>>> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy
>>> solution for me.
>>
>> You could also just put:
>>
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote:
> Tom Worster wrote:
> > thanks, Mel, that's good to know.
> >
> > i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy
> > solution for me.
>
> You could also just put:
>
> sshd_flags="-o X11Forwarding=no"
>
> into y
Tom Worster wrote:
> thanks, Mel, that's good to know.
>
> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy
> solution for me.
You could also just put:
sshd_flags="-o X11Forwarding=no"
into your /etc/rc.conf file.
Pretty much all of the rc.d scripts support the use of NA
On 9/16/09 1:35 PM, "Mel Flynn"
wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2009 18:45:29 Tom Worster wrote:
>> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
>> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
>>
>>
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 18:45:29 Tom Worster wrote:
> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
>
> for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it
>
is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a
daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command?
for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it
'-o X11Forwarding=no' without touching a co
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:36:39AM +1100, Nick Withers wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:57:30 -0800
> Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > People,
> >
> > I hope there are some kde or gnome wizards around to give
> > me a few clues about tuning my gnome|kde- lite window manager
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:57:30 -0800
Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> People,
>
> I hope there are some kde or gnome wizards around to give
> me a few clues about tuning my gnome|kde- lite window managers. So
> far I have the regular gnome2 and KDE3 desktops going on my test
People,
I hope there are some kde or gnome wizards around to give me a
few clues about tuning my gnome|kde- lite window managers. So far
I have the regular gnome2 and KDE3 desktops going on my test box
quite well. kde at least gives users the opportunity
How do I get pkg_info and pkg_delete to stop telling me that my 3rd
party app has no origin recorded?
I've added the two packages to HOLD_PKGS in pkgtools.conf and put
"+IGNOREME" in the package directories but pkg_delete still bitches
every time I do anything with ports/package system.
__
On Nov 8, 2004, at 3:52 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-11-08 15:08, "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Nov 8, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
I haven't tried "make world" in a long time, but I recently
installed a
clean snapshot of CURRENT using a slight
I can do
make buildworld
make installworld
without the DESTDIR and it works fine
but to build a jail I do
make world DESTDIR=/foo
and I still get the following problem (as do many others it appears).
This is under 5.3-STABLE from cvsup on November 16
cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o
On 2004-11-08 15:08, "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >I haven't tried "make world" in a long time, but I recently installed a
> >clean snapshot of CURRENT using a slightly different approach:
> >
> > # cd /usr/sr
On Nov 8, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-11-08 09:59, "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
make world DESTDIR=/foo
or
make buildworld DESTDIR=/foo
does not work on either my i386 or amd64 systems after a cvsup to
5.3-RELEASE and nativ
Hi
On Nov 8, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-11-08 09:59, "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
make world DESTDIR=/foo
or
make buildworld DESTDIR=/foo
does not work on either my i386 or amd64 systems after a cvsup to
5.3-RELEASE and nativ
On 2004-11-08 09:59, "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> make world DESTDIR=/foo
> or
> make buildworld DESTDIR=/foo
>
> does not work on either my i386 or amd64 systems after a cvsup to
> 5.3-RELEASE and native build. If you leave o
make world DESTDIR=/foo
or
make buildworld DESTDIR=/foo
does not work on either my i386 or amd64 systems after a cvsup to
5.3-RELEASE and native build. If you leave off the DESTDIR and build
for the running machine, it works fine. And the DESTDIR worked fine
under beta7 (and possibly
In the last episode (Oct 01), Roman Neuhauser said:
> yeah, i figured out i made a complete fool of myself after a bit more
> rtfming and googling (FOLDOC). now if i only knew why oh why is
> mkinstalldirs written this way.
I believe it's a workaround for shells that remove empty ``
expressions.
t;
> > what does it do?
>
> The set command will set $1, $2, etc as though the arguments were
> passed to the script itself on the commandline. So after a "set fnord
> foo", you could do
>
> $ echo $#
> 2
> $ echo $1
> fnord
> $ echo $*
> fnord foo
the arguments were
passed to the script itself on the commandline. So after a "set fnord
foo", you could do
$ echo $#
2
$ echo $1
fnord
$ echo $*
fnord foo
As for what fnord does? It gives you a headache.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
hi there.
could anyone tell me what $subject does? i can't find any explanation.
man pages for sh(1) (freebsd) and bash(1) (linux) don't mention fnord.
what does it do?
--
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.7-RC
12:42PM up 12 days, 19:57, 15 users, load averages: 0.02, 0.05, 0.08
end
To Unsu
52 matches
Mail list logo
