On 6/17/2011 2:48 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Sigh. If you'd ever actually filed a copyright registration or
transfer form, you would discover that one needs to get them notarized.
(Documenting that a certain document was available and signed at a
Le 15/06/2011 à 22:34:23+0200, Thomas Hansen a écrit
one of my mates teacher says that unix is free and your system running
like UnixWare / SCO UNIX and and that unix is free
Do your BSD kernel run the same unix kernel as unixware
Take a look :
http://www.levenez.com/unix
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/15 17:08:31 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net = To Thomas
Hansen :
CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed free, whereas UNIX is
CB still the proprietary property of ATT/Bell Labs.
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
73
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/15 17:08:31 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net = To Thomas
Hansen :
CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed free, whereas UNIX is
CB still the proprietary property of ATT
free,
whereas UNIX is CB still the proprietary property of ATT/Bell Labs.
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
Unix (note capitalization) is actually a trademark of the Open Group:
http://www.unix.org/
It's been owned by them for more than ten years, but it was passed
around between
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 14:22:43 +0100 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk =
To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
MS CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed free, whereas UNIX is
MS CB still the proprietary property of ATT/Bell Labs.
MS
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 10:06:42 -0400 Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS I think the confusion that you all are having is between the idea of
RS copyright and trademark. They are different. Copyright applies to the
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:29:42 AM Peter Vereshagin wrote:
There should be a difference recognized between own a Unix trademark by
http://www.unix.org/trademark.html and ownership of the Unix copyrights
by http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100330152829622 where I'm
pass.
There
is held by Linus. The Linux Trademark
Institute licenses the trademark to organizations under a free, perpetual,
worldwide sublicense. So, even if Linus were to change his mind and try to
start suing everyone using the trademark, (pigs fly first) it would all be
thrown out of court
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 11:54:05 -0400 Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark
I'll surely will when I'll have some to trade ;-)
RS
--
From: Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com
thrown out of court. Additionally, the source code is GPL, so even
if in the
fictional world of Linus taking the trademark elsewhere, you can
fork the code
and call it
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:31:19 PM Reko Turja wrote:
In that fictional world MySQL needed a fork and some GPL'd programs
have been retroactively made completely closed source, forking denied
after taking the issue into court...
I thought that Sun reversed that decision in 2008. Can you
On 16 June 2011 17:47, Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:31:19 PM Reko Turja wrote:
In that fictional world MySQL needed a fork and some GPL'd programs
have been retroactively made completely closed source, forking denied
after taking the issue into
On Thu, June 16, 2011 12:20 pm, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 11:54:05 -0400 Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 13:36:32 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DS RS Copyright pertains to the source code. Trademark pertains to the use
DS of
DS RS signs, symbols, names, logos, etc.
DS
DS Source code itself
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:22:43PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
Unix (note capitalization) is actually a trademark of the Open Group:
http://www.unix.org/
In case it was lost in the informative explanations
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:20:11PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
But both are just words/phrases, right?
Here's an example of the difference:
UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here, speaking
about the UNIX trademark, its applicability, who owns the trademark, and
so
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 12:46:20 -0600 Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
CP But both are just words/phrases, right?
CP
CP Here's an example of the difference:
Good example, it's on-topic ;-)
CP UNIX, the name, is a
, wouldn't refuse to certify his 'minix clone' in
the case it was for free. In his 'Just for fun' he tells he was following by
Solaris specs, so the well-known truth he started it from scratch may appear to
be not the all the truth in terms of legacy? Anyway the price of 'unix
certification
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:29:42 +0400, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org
wrote:
Lawyers are so lawyers ;-)
Two lawyers, three opinions. :-)
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
--As of June 16, 2011 11:21:34 PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin is alleged to
have said:
CP UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here,
speaking
Do we need a license to use it? ;-)
According to what I recall of my 'business law for managers' classes: As
long as we don't
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:20:43 -0400, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
According to what I recall of my 'business law for managers' classes: As
long as we don't claim we own it, and only *referring* to the company who
does or it's products, no. It's an identifying mark: You can use it to
I am out of the office until June 20th. I will only have intermittent access to
email. I will read and reply to your message when I get back to the office.
If you need assistance with a Berkeley DB or Product Management issue while I
am away, please contact ashok.jo...@oracle.com.
--As of June 17, 2011 12:47:45 AM +0200, Polytropon is alleged to have said:
(And note that a pure list of facts can't be copyrighted: The phone book
is often an example. It's just a list of names and numbers.)
Interesting, never tought of that, but sounds obvious.
--As for the rest, it
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 18:20:43 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To Peter Vereshagin :
DS CP UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here,
DS speaking
DS
DS Do we need a license to use it? ;-)
DS
DS According to what I recall of my
On Jun 16, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
And does FreeBSD Foundation own its FreeBSD UNIX then? If it does, did it pay
for it? Does it certify its FreeBSD as a UNIX and how much does it pay?
The FreeBSD Foundation is a non-profit organization which supports and
represents the
a program, you'd probably want to say who
No I don't. It's just not important to me. Why should I want to?
Because you CAN - and in the same statement, you are free NOT to
care about it. Software publishing and licensing terms are very
different, considering today's software. On one hand
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:43:59PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
(The other common case in the USA is road maps. A simple 'lines following
their geographic contours, labeled' is a set of facts. One result of this
is that most road maps in the US either are missing some minor roads, or
have
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:50:40AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:07:08 +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
It's just a matter of a freedom to speech to me. And to everyone else
I believe.
Copyright and ownership of creation just makes sure that someone can't
express OTHER's
biased description. Would you like to rethink
the phrasing rape me as a description of copyfree licensing terms as
embodied in a BSD License?
It's not _my_ interpretation of the license. The term originates
from the repeated discussion of the BSD license being not free
with the counterposition
being not free with the
counterposition that the BSD license is even _so_ free that it allows
the post-usage of the material - i. e. take it for free, change it,
give it another name, sell it for money. If a developer is FINE with
this kind of post-usage, he can use the BSD license.
Luckily
not free with the
counterposition that the BSD license is even _so_ free that it allows
the post-usage of the material - i. e. take it for free, change it,
give it another name, sell it for money. If a developer is FINE with
this kind of post-usage, he can use the BSD license.
Luckily
2011-06-16 19:36, Daniel Staal skrev:
On Thu, June 16, 2011 12:20 pm, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 11:54:05 -0400 Robert Simmonsrsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright
RS
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Bernt Hansson be...@bah.homeip.netwrote:
Unless you work the trademark in you have to pay to register the name.
I'm not sure by what mean by work the trademark in but every business is
entitled to use tm or sm identification without registration. However by
2011-06-17 00:20, Daniel Staal skrev:
--As of June 16, 2011 11:21:34 PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin is alleged to
have said:
(And note that a pure list of facts can't be copyrighted: The phone book
is often an example. It's just a list of names and numbers.)
Which is copyrighted, all databases
2011-06-17 06:53, Adam Vande More skrev:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Bernt Hanssonbe...@bah.homeip.netwrote:
Unless you work the trademark in you have to pay to register the name.
I'm not sure by what mean by work the trademark in but every business is
entitled to use tm or sm
2011-06-16 20:30, Chad Perrin skrev:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:22:43PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
Unix (note capitalization) is actually a trademark of the Open Group:
http://www.unix.org/
In EU there are
one of my mates teacher says that unix is free and your system running
like UnixWare / SCO UNIX and and that unix is free
Do your BSD kernel run the same unix kernel as unixware
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
* Thomas Hansen t...@danskdatacenter.dk [2011-06-15 22:34:23 +0200]:
one of my mates teacher says that unix is free and your system running
like UnixWare / SCO UNIX and and that unix is free
Do your BSD kernel run the same unix kernel as unixware
FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which
On 15/06/2011 21:34, Thomas Hansen wrote:
one of my mates teacher says that unix is free and your system running
like UnixWare / SCO UNIX and and that unix is free
Some Unix is free (the best sorts), others are most certainly not free
at all.
FreeBSD is pretty much the opposite end
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net
Date: Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: free sco unix
To: Thomas Hansen t...@danskdatacenter.dk
'y' and 't' are too close in mutt :(
* Thomas Hansen t...@danskdatacenter.dk [2011-06-16 00:07:11 +0200
Hi Ramu cc questions@
I have to make CRUX and FREE BSD dual boot. Is that possible? how can i do
that?? I have CRUX installed before.
I wrote some notes here:
http://berklix.com/~jhs/txt/install_bsd.html
Hope it may help you or similar enquirers.
I dont see anything about
On 25/05/2011 18:45, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi Ramu cc questions@
I have to make CRUX and FREE BSD dual boot. Is that possible? how can i do
that?? I have CRUX installed before.
I wrote some notes here:
http://berklix.com/~jhs/txt/install_bsd.html
Hope it may help you or similar
Hi,
Reference:
From: Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:15:16 +0100
Message-id: 4ddd7164.9020...@onetel.com
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
On 25/05/2011 18:45, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi Ramu cc questions@
I have to make CRUX and FREE BSD dual
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:45:38PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi Ramu cc questions@
I have to make CRUX and FREE BSD dual boot. Is that possible? how can i
do
that?? I have CRUX installed before.
I wrote some notes here:
http
hi,
I have to make CRUX and FREE BSD dual boot. Is that possible? how can i do
that?? I have CRUX installed before. now i want to use Free BSD 7.3. please
help me, thank you.
Best regards,
ramu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hi,
Reference:
From: Ramu Chakravadhanula boys21cent...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:38:36 +0200
Message-id: banlktinq0y-wkwj7rzrqh08huvquvv_...@mail.gmail.com
Ramu Chakravadhanula wrote:
hi,
I have to make CRUX and FREE BSD dual boot. Is that possible? how can
Ramu Chakravadhanula wrote:
hi,
I have to make CRUX and FREE BSD dual boot. Is that possible? how can i do
that?? I have CRUX installed before. now i want to use Free BSD 7.3. please
PS did you know 8.2 exists ?
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:38:36PM +0200, Ramu Chakravadhanula wrote:
hi,
I have to make CRUX and FREE BSD dual boot. Is that possible? how can i do
that?? I have CRUX installed before. now i want to use Free BSD 7.3. please
help me, thank you.
The best thing would be to delete Linux off
To view the message, please use an HTML compatible email viewer!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Mike Clarke jmc-freeb...@milibyte.co.uk wrote:
On Monday 27 September 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to
install 8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree;
then install what ports I can from packages and also fetch the
On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:02 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Mike Clarke jmc-freeb...@milibyte.co.uk wrote:
On Monday 27 September 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to
install 8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree;
then
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:24:26 -0500, Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz wrote:
As I understand it: The OS itself is stable, but the ports are
constantly in flux and may be issues.
Not exactly. It depends on which update road you follow.
Say, you use freebsd-update (the binary update), or use
Polytropon said:
If you decide to upgrade your ports tree because you need newer
versions or specific features, it *may* be possible that a certain
point in time of -RELEASE is not sufficient, and this might force
you to change your road to follow -STABLE. This can either be the
case by
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I'm advocating starting from a stable and self-consistent baseline,
consisting of a release _and_ its corresponding port/package
collection, and then considering whether any updates are needed.
You might be interested to follow Manolis' custom DVD which is based
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Ryan Coleman wrote:
As I understand it: The OS itself is stable, but the ports are constantly in
flux and may be issues.
During a FreeBSD release, the ports tree is frozen and port updates
are delayed. So a FreeBSD release really does come with with a somewhat
stale
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 330, Issue 2, Message: 22
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:02:29 -0700 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Mike Clarke jmc-freeb...@milibyte.co.uk wrote:
On Monday 27 September 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to
On Tuesday 28 September 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Mike Clarke jmc-freeb...@milibyte.co.uk wrote:
[snip]
The problem is if/when you need to update a port as a result of
a security advisory. If your ports tree is very much out of date
then it's likely that updating that one port
On Tuesday 28 September 2010, Ian Smith wrote:
I agree with Mike about the worms :) I have an 8.0-RELEASE system
with many ports installed and quite a few configured to taste with a
recently upgraded 8-STABLE world, working through a huge portversion
update list, started by fetching over
Mouse works in text mode in root and personal directories.
Does not work in KDE graphics after startx is typed in personal directory.
Graphics comes up normally.
Using a ps2 mouse.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
victor
___
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:20:49 -0400, victor kovacs slowp...@pathcom.com wrote:
Mouse works in text mode in root and personal directories.
Does not work in KDE graphics after startx is typed in personal directory.
Graphics comes up normally.
Using a ps2 mouse.
Any suggestions?
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 26/09/2010 13:30:19, Michel Talon wrote:
Matthew Seaman said
Be aware that installing the ports tree from the DVD images
is not the ideal way to do it ... it is better to ... grab
an up-to-date copy of the ports directly from the
On Monday 27 September 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to install
8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree; then install
what ports I can from packages and also fetch the corresponding
distfiles; and finally build -- from
Quoth Mike Clarke on Monday, 27 September 2010:
On Monday 27 September 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to install
8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree; then install
what ports I can from packages and also fetch the
It appears that all the distfile locations are empty.
For example: KDE4
Master site: empty
Distfiles: none
Extract-only: empty
Have the distfiles for the GUI been left out of the dvd?
Same situation when 32 or 64 side of dvd is loaded.
The dvd disk reader is read only. It cannot write to
On 26/09/2010 02:50:55, victor kovacs wrote:
It appears that all the distfile locations are empty.
For example: KDE4
Master site: empty
Distfiles: none
Extract-only: empty
That's deliberate. x11/kde4 is a metaport -- that is, it installs
nothing itself, but exists only to hold
Matthew Seaman said
Be aware that installing the ports tree from the DVD images is not the
ideal way to do it. If you have the connectivity on your newly
installed system, it is better to use either csup(1) or portsnap(1) to
grab an up-to-date copy of the ports directly from the net.
I
On 26/09/2010 13:30:19, Michel Talon wrote:
Matthew Seaman said
Be aware that installing the ports tree from the DVD images is not the
ideal way to do it. If you have the connectivity on your newly
installed system, it is better to use either csup(1) or portsnap(1) to
grab an up-to-date
, I thought
I might introduce myself by giving awayt a free compilation of 12 of my best
songs from 6 albums spanning 2 decades.
To grab your's just email eupho...@billyfranks.com and you will get the
download link.
If ya want to read Christopher Brookmyres introduction, here it is:
Euphoria
hello,
I am looking for something on BSD that will give me the same info as
free(1) in Linux. i.e. I would like to know the state of total/used/free
memory and swap.
I know there are a number of utilities in ports that will let me do
this, I am however looking for something in the base system
On 18/08/2010 16:18, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
hello,
I am looking for something on BSD that will give me the same info as
free(1) in Linux. i.e. I would like to know the state of total/used/free
memory and swap.
I know there are a number of utilities in ports that will let me do
this, I am
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Aleksandr Miroslav
alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
I am looking for something on BSD that will give me the same info as
free(1) in Linux. i.e. I would like to know the state of total/used/free
memory and swap.
I know there are a number of utilities
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:18:58 -0400
Aleksandr Miroslav alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
I am looking for something on BSD that will give me the same info as
free(1) in Linux. i.e. I would like to know the state of
total/used/free memory and swap.
I know there are a number of utilities
on wed, aug 18, 2010 at 1:04 pm, chris maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
Would not the info displayed in the command top suffice?
Yes, top -n 1 does (sort of) display the info I need.
The swap portion gives me the same info as Linux free, the memory
portion is more cryptic, I guess due
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:41 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is there any particular reason you want to know? Free memory isn't a
very meaningful concept in FreeBSD.
I have a webserver that had it's Apache killed this morning. The box
itself had been stable for several years, as well
--On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 14:14:25 -0400 Aleksandr Miroslav
alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:41 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is there any particular reason you want to know? Free memory isn't a
very meaningful concept in FreeBSD.
I have a webserver
as Linux free, the memory
portion is more cryptic, I guess due to differences in how FreeBSD
allocates memory.
Although a BSD free would probably be easier to remember, top -n 1 does the
job. ___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
the info I need.
The swap portion gives me the same info as Linux free, the memory
portion is more cryptic, I guess due to differences in how FreeBSD
allocates memory.
Although a BSD free would probably be easier to remember, top -n 1 does the
job
On 8/18/2010 1:06 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
on wed, aug 18, 2010 at 1:04 pm, chris manessch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
Would not the info displayed in the command top suffice?
Yes, top -n 1 does (sort of) display the info I need.
The swap portion gives me the same info as Linux free
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
?
Thanks,
--jim
I'm offering to port these for you tomorrow, but first let's sort out
your terminology.
Freeware != free software.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software
Which is it? I'll port free software for you, but you need to let me
know what the distribution terms are.
Chris
Question: I'd like to have these two applications that I wrote, and
continue to build and maintain as/when needed, and would like to have
them listed (no real need for a port, except, perhaps, to make sure
Tcl/Tk 8.4.x, various Tcl/Tk libs, and the netpbm/pbmplus/whatever
utils are available) as
Greetings.
I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely
In a worker thread, I have the following.
CODE---
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size(inst));
free(inst);
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, after free allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size
In the last episode (Jun 11), Vikash Badal said:
I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely
In a worker thread, I have the following.
CODE---
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size(inst));
free(inst);
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, after
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dan Nelson
Sent: 11 June 2010 09:56 PM
To: Vikash Badal
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0
The fix
is to
explicitly zero the pointer you just free'd, to prevent it from being
used accidentally later.
Made this change:
CODE---
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size(inst));
free(inst);
free(inst);
return 0;
---/CODE
Still no seg fault
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
In the last episode (May 22), Anoop Kumar Narayanan said:
I think glibc uses asynchronous free, as in it doesn't free the memory
immediately. So even though the memory is free'd its still part of the
process's address
Greetings.
Excuse me if this is a stupid questions.
I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely
In a worker thread, I have the following.
CODE---
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size(inst));
free(inst);
LogMessage(DEBUG_0
));
free(inst);
LogMessage(DEBUG_0, after free allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size(inst));
return 0;
---/CODE
output allocated 2304
output after free allocated 2304
from playing around, this should have segfaulted but it didn't
You're invoking undefined behaviour
I think glibc uses asynchronous free, as in it doesn't free the memory
immediately. So even though the memory is free'd its still part of the
process's address space but present in the free pool and so it doesn't
crash.
-Anoop
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com
In the last episode (May 22), Anoop Kumar Narayanan said:
I think glibc uses asynchronous free, as in it doesn't free the memory
immediately. So even though the memory is free'd its still part of the
process's address space but present in the free pool and so it doesn't
crash.
FreeBSD
Can we name files in freebsd with unicode characters?
Also are unicode characters supported in file i/o system calls like open,
dllopen, fopen? i.e. can we open a file with unicode pathname?
for e.g in windows CreatefileW is used for opening files with unicode pathnames
(wide characters).
If so
On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Kotecha, Grishma wrote:
Can we name files in freebsd with unicode characters?
UFS/UFS2 supports 8-bit chars (except NULL), so UTF8 representation for Unicode
filenames ought to work OK.
Also are unicode characters supported in file i/o system calls like open,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2010 20:11:15, Kotecha, Grishma wrote:
Can we name files in freebsd with unicode characters?
Also are unicode characters supported in file i/o system calls like open,
dllopen, fopen? i.e. can we open a file with unicode pathname?
for e.g
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2010 20:11:15, Kotecha, Grishma wrote:
Can we name files in freebsd with unicode characters?
Also are unicode characters supported in file i/o system
UTF8 works grate here in irssi and tcsh over putty, same goes for filenames.
Had no problem with it what so ever, just needed to set in .cshrc:
setenv LC_CTYPE he_IL.UTF-8
never checked any X applications though.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
On Thu,
As the FreeBSD license is less restrictive than the GPL, it's pretty
much safe to say that wherever you are permitted install GPL'd software,
you could substitute FreeBSD licensed software without legal penalty.
(Note: *install* -- redistribution is a different matter)
You do not have to
Free BSD representative,
I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Public
License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the
requester of this software as coming through our subcontracts division.
Jack Guelff
Subcontracts Administrator
Software
FBSD has it's own licensing. I'll defer to others as to the details, or visit
www.freebsd.org
- Original Message -
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
To: questi...@freebsd.org questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue Mar 23 09:40:15 2010
Subject: Free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/03/2010 14:40:15, jegue...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
Free BSD representative,
I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Public
License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the
requester
101 - 200 of 856 matches
Mail list logo
