Re: fsck in securelevel 2?

2005-04-24 Thread James Alexander Cook
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:49:27PM +0200, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to check the root partition with fsck and it found errors and > for my greatest surprise, it answered its questions automatically with > no. It is due to the securelevel 2? I've been thinking whether fsck uses > d

Re: fsck in securelevel 2?

2005-04-24 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:49:27PM +0200, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to check the root partition with fsck and it found errors and > for my greatest surprise, it answered its questions automatically with > no. It is due to the securelevel 2? I've been thinking whether fsck uses > d

fsck in securelevel 2?

2005-04-24 Thread Kövesdán Gábor
Hi, I tried to check the root partition with fsck and it found errors and for my greatest surprise, it answered its questions automatically with no. It is due to the securelevel 2? I've been thinking whether fsck uses direct access (which is denied by the securelevel) or not? Cheers, Gábor Köve