I use file backed GELI fs in this manner. Of course you
can script it yourself, but I find the ez-jail handles my
requirements perfectly.
Thanks, I'll look into using GELI. I think if I do that, I'll have to mount
the file system in the host environment at boot time so that it can prompt for
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Tim Gustafson t...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
I use file backed GELI fs in this manner. Of course you
can script it yourself, but I find the ez-jail handles my
requirements perfectly.
Thanks, I'll look into using GELI. I think if I do that, I'll have to
mount
Hi, all.
I was wondering if anyone could offer any personal experience with using either
fusefs-cryptofs or fusefs-cryptofs.
I'm going to be bringing a FreeBSD OpenLDAP server online soon and I need to
have the contents of the OpenLDAP database encrypted in the event of a physical
security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/06/2010 17:11:22, Tim Gustafson wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could offer any personal experience with
using either fusefs-cryptofs or fusefs-cryptofs.
I'm going to be bringing a FreeBSD OpenLDAP server online soon and I
need to have
On FreeBSD, this is spelled GELI (or GBDE, but I think geli is
slightly better). Native filesystem level encryption -- rather
more efficient than something like fuse, needs no extra software
installed, very secure.
Sorry, I should have been more specific:
This is in the context of a jailed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/06/2010 18:02:25, Tim Gustafson wrote:
On FreeBSD, this is spelled GELI (or GBDE, but I think geli is
slightly better). Native filesystem level encryption -- rather
more efficient than something like fuse, needs no extra software
installed,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Tim Gustafson t...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
On FreeBSD, this is spelled GELI (or GBDE, but I think geli is
slightly better). Native filesystem level encryption -- rather
more efficient than something like fuse, needs no extra software
installed, very secure.
