Re: ipfw and nmap

2005-03-15 Thread Eric McCoy
daniel quinn wrote: i've been experimenting with ipfw since moving some of my machines from linux to freebsd and i've run across an oddity wrt nmap and freebsd firewalls. it doesn't seem to work and the activity isn't logged either. the firewall is working though. ssh goes through, while

ipfw and nmap

2005-03-14 Thread daniel quinn
i've been experimenting with ipfw since moving some of my machines from linux to freebsd and i've run across an oddity wrt nmap and freebsd firewalls. it doesn't seem to work and the activity isn't logged either. the firewall is working though. ssh goes through, while other ports are being

Re: ipfw and nmap

2005-03-14 Thread sn1tch
You could try using nmap with the -sA (ACK) scanning...this is good for mapping firewall rulesets to see what is being let in. You could also use -f (fragment) with -sS to send fragmented packets...this will show open ports unless most of the time too. But -sA is better since the firewall things

Re: ipfw and nmap

2005-02-24 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:49:39AM -0500, sn1tch wrote: I am fairly new to IPFW, I have question regarding the stateful part of it. Now I may just be misunderstanding this so set me straight if I am. From what I understand when you add a check-state rule and then following that a rule to

ipfw and nmap

2005-02-23 Thread sn1tch
I am fairly new to IPFW, I have question regarding the stateful part of it. Now I may just be misunderstanding this so set me straight if I am. From what I understand when you add a check-state rule and then following that a rule to keep-state, if a packet destined for that port is new and setup