Wojciech,
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 09:03 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > AFAIK, IPv6 setup is much more difficult than IPv4 setup. Still i don't
>
> i don't think so. it is no more difficult, or even easier.
>
> more difficult is to put rev-dns entries but still not a problem
You won! Becaus
AFAIK, IPv6 setup is much more difficult than IPv4 setup. Still i don't
i don't think so. it is no more difficult, or even easier.
more difficult is to put rev-dns entries but still not a problem
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
On 11/5/07, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to set my machine up to be on both IPv4 and IPv6. I have read
> the stuff on 6over4 and such and still a little confused on a few things:
>
> 1. The machine I want to do the tunneling on is behind a NAT'ed firewall
> how do I relia
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 03:16 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> I want to set my machine up to be on both IPv4 and IPv6. I have read
> the stuff on 6over4 and such and still a little confused on a few things:
>
> 1. The machine I want to do the tunneling on is behind a NAT'ed firewall
> how d
I want to set my machine up to be on both IPv4 and IPv6. I have read
the stuff on 6over4 and such and still a little confused on a few things:
1. The machine I want to do the tunneling on is behind a NAT'ed firewall
how do I reliabelly obtain the external IP of the firewall (dhcp
assigned from c
