Bill Moran wrote:
Attila Nagyn wrote:
Is this statement still valid?
ext3 is unsafe for maildir, and with softupdates, so is ffs.
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0202/0358.html
Yes,
I don't think this is true for Soft Updates, unless you take your
next statement into account
Terry Lambert wrote:
SNIP
In reality, anything comes with a certain amount of risk, and that
statement is too vague to be useful.
Sure; you also forgot terrorists blowing up the data center where
you computer is housed, and a total collapse of the government in
the country where it's located,
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
Is this statement still valid?
ext3 is unsafe for maildir, and with softupdates, so is ffs.
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0202/0358.html
Yes,
It's also true that any form of write-caching is unsafe, so disable
the caches on your SCSI and ATA hard drives. Simply
sync, as the potential of loss is much greater...
just my two cents
Raphael
Le Mercredi, 23 juil 2003, à 17:38 Europe/Zurich, Bill Moran a écrit :
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
Is this statement still valid?
ext3 is unsafe for maildir, and with softupdates, so is ffs.
http://www.irbs.net/internet
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:38:44AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
Is this statement still valid?
ext3 is unsafe for maildir, and with softupdates, so is ffs.
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0202/0358.html
Yes,
It's also true that any form of write-caching
