Re: mount read only || chflags schg sec level 2

2002-09-18 Thread Jimmy Lantz
At 09:55 2002-09-17 -0400, you wrote: Jimmy Lantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm looking for away to write protect some files whats the pros and cons with having the file on a seperate partition and mount that read-only or use the chflags schg and go to kernel security level 2? *Either*

mount read only || chflags schg sec level 2

2002-09-17 Thread Jimmy Lantz
Hi, I'm looking for away to write protect some files whats the pros and cons with having the file on a seperate partition and mount that read-only or use the chflags schg and go to kernel security level 2? / Jim. NB. I'm sending this for the second time, and I do apologize if this in fact was

Re: mount read only || chflags schg sec level 2

2002-09-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:39:10AM +0200, Jimmy Lantz wrote: I'm looking for away to write protect some files whats the pros and cons with having the file on a seperate partition and mount that read-only or use the chflags schg and go to kernel security level 2? Either should work fine at

Re: mount read only || chflags schg sec level 2

2002-09-17 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Jimmy Lantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm looking for away to write protect some files whats the pros and cons with having the file on a seperate partition and mount that read-only or use the chflags schg and go to kernel security level 2? *Either* way you probably want to raise the