On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 01:03:31PM +, Chris wrote:
> On 27/01/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:15:05PM -0500, Romeo Theriault wrote:
> > > A week or so ago I wrote to the this list asking about Freebsd and
> > > Mysql, wondering if you still needed
On 27/01/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:15:05PM -0500, Romeo Theriault wrote:
> > A week or so ago I wrote to the this list asking about Freebsd and
> > Mysql, wondering if you still needed to compile Mysql with
> > linuxthreads to get better performance
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 08:28:44PM -0500, Romeo Theriault wrote:
> I didn't personally measure it, though someday I hope to be able to,
> but I did read in several places that using the ULE scheduler was the
> better choice to use with FreeBSD. Here are the links that are
> noteworthy:
>
> h
I didn't personally measure it, though someday I hope to be able to,
but I did read in several places that using the ULE scheduler was the
better choice to use with FreeBSD. Here are the links that are
noteworthy:
http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/MySQL
http://blog.gslin.org/archives/200
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:15:05PM -0500, Romeo Theriault wrote:
> A week or so ago I wrote to the this list asking about Freebsd and
> Mysql, wondering if you still needed to compile Mysql with
> linuxthreads to get better performance under Freebsd 6. I didn't get
> much of a response so I l
A week or so ago I wrote to the this list asking about Freebsd and
Mysql, wondering if you still needed to compile Mysql with
linuxthreads to get better performance under Freebsd 6. I didn't get
much of a response so I looked around for the answer. I thought I'd
write back to the mailing li
