Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a

2005-12-11 Thread Benjamin Thelen
> * Benjamin Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-12-2005 21:15:25 +0100]: >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> only >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook >> something? > > Just force the thing to install and don't give another

Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a

2005-12-11 Thread Benjamin Thelen
Hello Mike, thanks for your response! I suppose you're using the ports openssl instead of the base system. Thus your solution is definitely a good way as far as I can see, but I would like to keep the base system openssl if possible. Best, Ben > Hi Benjamin, > > I had the same problem. The sol

Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a

2005-12-11 Thread Martin Möller
* Benjamin Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-12-2005 21:15:25 +0100]: > I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the only > one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook > something? Just force the thing to install and don't give another thought to

Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a

2005-12-10 Thread Michael Wichmann
Hi Benjamin, I had the same problem. The solution to this problem for me was the portupgrade "-o" option to replace openssl-beta with openssl-stable and update all the dependencies. Have a look in the portupgrade man page. There is an example how to use this option. For me it looked something like

Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a

2005-12-10 Thread Benjamin Thelen
> On Friday 09 December 2005 15:36, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> > On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> >> You FreeBSD guys, >> >> >> >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? >> Is >> >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), wheth

Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a

2005-12-09 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 09 December 2005 15:36, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > > On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > >> You FreeBSD guys, > >> > >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is > >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list >

Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a

2005-12-09 Thread Benjamin Thelen
> On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> You FreeBSD guys, >> >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list >> (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just st

Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a

2005-12-09 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > You FreeBSD guys, > > This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is > there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list > (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid >

openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a

2005-12-09 Thread Benjamin Thelen
You FreeBSD guys, This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid work arounds -sorry. I suppose there are many of you using the Open