openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread Duane Winner
Hello, Has anybody been able to get OpenOffice installed from port on 5.3-RELEASE ? I am running 5.3-RELEASE-p2 (Xorg and JDK1.4.2p7 also installed) Yesterday, I attempted: # portinstall openoffice and chose editors/openoffice-1.1 14 hours later... the output looked like it built cleanly, but

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread albi
Duane Winner wrote: Sigh..it's always OpenOffice that gives me headaches. I tried to just do a pkg_add -rv openoffice and that got me openoffice-1.1.2, which I guess I could live with until it gets fixed, but then I discovered during 'openoffice-1.1.2-setup' that characters were overlapping

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread albi
albi wrote: there's more info here : http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ build-instructions, known problems and alternative downloads on the webpage above mentioned the link that says : OOo 1.1.3 for 4.10 and 1.1.2 for 5.2.1-RELEASE actually has OOo 1.1.3 for 5.3 for download

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread Duane Winner
Thanks! I was able to find OOo_1.1.3_FreeBSD53Intel_install.tbz and get that installed and working. I still had the bad user interface fonts, but I found that to be a problem with my xorg config, and I (mostly) fixed it. I sitll have some minor 'ticks' snuggled inside my r's, n's, e's and g

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread Benjamin Walkenhorst
I was too lazy to wait for the thin to build, so I downloaded the binary package. Works fine. =) Kind regards, Benjamin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread albi
Duane Winner wrote: Thanks! I was able to find OOo_1.1.3_FreeBSD53Intel_install.tbz and get that installed and working. nice I still had the bad user interface fonts, but I found that to be a problem with my xorg config, and I (mostly) fixed it. I sitll have some minor 'ticks' snuggled inside

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread nbco
On Friday 07 January 2005 17:56, albi wrote: Duane Winner wrote: We generally do a portupgrade -a to upgrade ports unless /usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again and end up failing? a dirty

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread Duane Winner
gustaaf wijnands wrote: Just a couple more questions: If I keep my ports tree cvsup'd every day, I'm going to have: openoffice-1.1.3 needs updating (port has 1.1.3_1) We generally do a portupgrade -a to upgrade ports unless /usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread Duane Winner
nbco wrote: On Friday 07 January 2005 17:56, albi wrote: Duane Winner wrote: We generally do a portupgrade -a to upgrade ports unless /usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again and end up failing?

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread Joshua Lokken
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:58:22 -0500, Duane Winner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gustaaf wijnands wrote: Just a couple more questions: If I keep my ports tree cvsup'd every day, I'm going to have: openoffice-1.1.3 needs updating (port has 1.1.3_1) We generally do a portupgrade

Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE

2005-01-07 Thread Duane Winner
Joshua Lokken wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:58:22 -0500, Duane Winner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gustaaf wijnands wrote: Just a couple more questions: If I keep my ports tree cvsup'd every day, I'm going to have: openoffice-1.1.3 needs updating (port has 1.1.3_1) We generally do a