On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Hari Bhaskaran wrote:
> openssl.org just decided to re-release a release!
> It would have been much cleaner to bump up a version
> if they fix something! Come on, we are in 2003!
Yeah, and they're on 0.9.7. ;)
KeS
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsub
openssl.org just decided to re-release a release!
It would have been much cleaner to bump up a version
if they fix something! Come on, we are in 2003!
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=20021208.215539.34764527.levitte%40openssl.org
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:21:30AM -0600, Hari Bhaskaran wrote
Funny the ftp directory in ftp.openssl.org/source
contains two sets of files. The checksum in ports
seem to match with the BOGUS one.
-rw-rw-r-- 1 openssl openssl 691 Dec 9 16:41
openssl-0.9.6h.BOGUS-0.9.6h.patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 openssl openssl 2178290 Dec 5 23:25 openssl-0.9.6h.BOG
Confirmed -- Hari is not alone.
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:13, Hari Bhaskaran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just did a cvsup and updated the ports collection
> and wanted to update the openssl. I see the makefile
> was updated to 0.9.6h, but the checksum isn't. Unless
> of course the openssl.org got yet anoth
Hi,
I just did a cvsup and updated the ports collection
and wanted to update the openssl. I see the makefile
was updated to 0.9.6h, but the checksum isn't. Unless
of course the openssl.org got yet another bad file.
# make
>> openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
>>
