On 3/14/07, Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/14/07, Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes. but ipfw is most universal having all needed things at one place.
> firewalling, routing, shaping, etc.
PF too. is all at same place.
And pf has nat built-in, so it runs in
On 3/14/07, Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm likely to do the ipfw approach suggested by Wojceich,
>> as soon as I rebuild with "options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD",
>
>
> This could be done with pf route-to too.
yes. but ipfw is most universal having all needed things at one place.
I'm likely to do the ipfw approach suggested by Wojceich,
as soon as I rebuild with "options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD",
This could be done with pf route-to too.
yes. but ipfw is most universal having all needed things at one place.
firewalling, routing, shaping, etc.
_
interfaces.
I'm familiar with route(8)... but I don't see how that will work.
Can you expand on your comment?
I'm likely to do the ipfw approach suggested by Wojceich,
as soon as I rebuild with "options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD",
exactly, sorry i forgot to mention about that option.
___
On 3/14/07, Mark Messier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Route has more information if you want to setup default routes
for interfaces.
I'm familiar with route(8)... but I don't see how that will work.
Can you expand on your comment?
I'm likely to do the ipfw approach suggested by Wojceich,
as
>> Route has more information if you want to setup default routes
for interfaces.
I'm familiar with route(8)... but I don't see how that will work.
Can you expand on your comment?
I'm likely to do the ipfw approach suggested by Wojceich,
as soon as I rebuild with "options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD",
That is, I want per-interface default routes
(is this the correct term?).
How do I do this?
Thanks,
-mark
Route has more information if you want to setup default routes for
interfaces. Either that, or natd will yield a solution for you.
natd needs IPFW and is quite CPU consuming compared
address go out the netB physical interface.
That is, I want per-interface default routes
(is this the correct term?).
How do I do this?
Thanks,
-mark
Route has more information if you want to setup default routes for interfaces.
Either that, or natd will yield a solution for you.
-Garrett
and packets sourced from the
netB IP address go out the netB physical interface.
That is, I want per-interface default routes
(is this the correct term?).
How do I do this?
using ipfw
rule example:
add xxx fwd router_for_a_link all from outgoing_address/range to any
please learn at least
is, I want per-interface default routes
(is this the correct term?).
How do I do this?
Thanks,
-mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
10 matches
Mail list logo