On 11/18/10 03:12, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 16:58, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Thanks.
I got it. But it seems that my first porting task run into some difficulties
for the advanced porters, since there is no autotool environment.
By the way, the global
2010/11/18 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Well,
in this case, it would really be a 'nice to have', maybe this is worth a PR?
Try asking on the ports@ list. I'm not sure what the criteria is for
something being listed there - if something isn't going to be used by
very many ports, it
On 11/18/10 13:52, Rob Farmer wrote:
2010/11/18 O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Well,
in this case, it would really be a 'nice to have', maybe this is worth a PR?
Try asking on the ports@ list. I'm not sure what the criteria is for
something being listed there - if something isn't
Hello.
I try to create a port of a software which does not have a Makefile and
is build via a propriate csh script. Installation is done temporarely
into some lib's and exe's subfolder withing the source folder, so I need
to tell the top level Makefile of the port to use a specific build
2010/11/17 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Hello.
I try to create a port of a software which does not have a Makefile and is
build via a propriate csh script. Installation is done temporarely into some
lib's and exe's subfolder withing the source folder, so I need to tell the
top
On 11/17/10 22:01, Rob Farmer wrote:
2010/11/17 O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Hello.
I try to create a port of a software which does not have a Makefile and is
build via a propriate csh script. Installation is done temporarely into some
lib's and exe's subfolder withing the source
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 16:58, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Thanks.
I got it. But it seems that my first porting task run into some difficulties
for the advanced porters, since there is no autotool environment.
By the way, the global environment variable ${CSH} seems to
