On 07/23/2010 01:56 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
Now about my project. Since about 4.0 I stopped using the ports tree
method. I now all most totally use the package system. I do not upgrade
a RELEASE but instead use the install from scratch method about a few
weeks after a new RELEASE is published. So
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:56:56 +0800
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
tree is no big deal, but I bet they don't do backups.
If that's an issue, don't back it up.
That ports tree
directory is a large resource hog if you lift the blinders and look
at the big picture.
Just my 2 cents
--On Thursday, July 22, 2010 02:21:59 +0200 claudiu vasadi
claudiu.vas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the rmconfig-recursive. I did not know about it.
Nor did I. And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what all the
make targets are in /usr/ports? Is this documented
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:15:10 -0500, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com
wrote:
And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what all the
make targets are in /usr/ports? Is this documented anywhere?
Yes, man 7 ports, section TARGETS.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD
are in /usr/ports? Is this documented anywhere?
Hi,
This is documented in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk - look for the string
Default targets and their behaviors:.
Regards,
--
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports require an existing INDEX file
to process and since I
On 7/22/2010 8:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports require an existing
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 7/22/2010 8:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports
On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports require
Benjamin Lee wrote:
On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports
On 23/07/2010 02:20:02, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
I've heard of a few people trying to do things like
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:14:12AM +0100, Matthew Seaman thus spake:
On 23/07/2010 02:20:02, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I
hello guys,
is there a way to do make rmconfig for all ports at once ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
one solution I just created would be:
for i in `find /usr/ports/ -type directory -print`; do `cd $i make
rmconfig`;done
but I am wondering if there is a official way. man portsclean did not give
me any options to do it.
Another thing would be to make rmconfig in all dir's that are required
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
claudiu vasadi wrote:
one solution I just created would be:
for i in `find /usr/ports/ -type directory -print`; do `cd $i make
rmconfig`;done
but I am wondering if there is a official way. man portsclean did not give
me any options to do
On 07/21/2010 04:38 PM, claudiu vasadi wrote:
hello guys,
is there a way to do make rmconfig for all ports at once ?
The fastest way is:
rm -rf /var/db/ports/*
but this breaks the abstraction. The right thing to do would be to
make rmconfig in each port directory.
--
Benjamin Lee
http
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the rmconfig-recursive. I did not know about it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
in the meantime I wrote the following quick script:
#!/bin/sh
# Create a list of all dir's
find /usr/ports/ -depth 2 -type directory -print ports_structure
# for each discovered dir, cd into it and do rmconfig
file=ports_structure
while read dr1
do
cd $dr1;make rmconfig
done$file
very
Quoth claudiu vasadi on Thursday, 22 July 2010:
in the meantime I wrote the following quick script:
#!/bin/sh
# Create a list of all dir's
find /usr/ports/ -depth 2 -type directory -print ports_structure
# for each discovered dir, cd into it and do rmconfig
file=ports_structure
need the GD extension).
Any help would be appreciated.
ds9# pwd
/usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions
ds9# make
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
=== Found saved configuration for php4-extensions-1.0
=== Extracting for php4
to build has a security
issue. How can I work arround this (I really need the GD extension).
Any help would be appreciated.
ds9# pwd
/usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions
=== png-1.4.1_1 is forbidden: vulnerable to remote buffer overflow.
png is currently at version 1.4.3 in ports. Try updating
might also consider simply running
portmaster as root.
There is nothing preferable about running it with sudo, it
is a feature
that I added because users so often requested it.
I have apply your advice, and I haven't got problem. Now I can install ports
from packages (if available) or from
On Friday 02 July 2010, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each package with the
locally compiled port?
portmaster -f -a
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
Be prepared to
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 317, Issue 9, Message: 26
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:52:54 -0400 Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/1/10 5:58 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barberglen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Once ports or packages are installed
if something was installed by
making a port is that /var/db/ports will contain a directory for that
port with the file 'options', created or updated by 'make config'.
A package is a precompiled port - as you said correctly, using
the default options for that port. Nothing more or less
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2010 18:57:11, Polytropon wrote:
I don't know where these 'do not mix ports and packages' warnings come
from, but I suspect it's from people who think that they're different :)
I think it may have come from PC-BSD, taking into mind
the line PM_SU_VERBOSE, just with
PM_SU_CMD=/usr/local/bin/sudo I can install without problem packages
with $ portmaster -P -a -x openoffice
But if there is no package available for the port, I got the message
(it is an example) :
= libpng-1.4.3.tar.xz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports
Hello,
I setup my system using packages. I have 675 packages installed and 0
ports installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each package with the locally compiled
port?
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions and will leave me with 0
installed packages and 675 installed
Hi, Chris
On 7/1/10 5:23 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
I setup my system using packages. I have 675 packages installed and 0
ports installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each package with the locally compiled
port?
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
On 7/1/10 5:31 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi, Chris
On 7/1/10 5:23 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
I setup my system using packages. I have 675 packages installed
and 0 ports installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each package with the locally
compiled port?
Ideally the procedure
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Once ports or packages are installed,
there is no
differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my 'pkg_add'
installed packages using ports and eventually they will all be converted
On 7/1/10 5:58 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barberglen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Once ports or packages are installed,
there is no
differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my 'pkg_add'
installed packages using
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@yahoo.com wrote:
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each package with the
locally compiled port?
portmaster -f -a
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
Be prepared to answer hundreds of options questions. To take the
On 7/1/10 7:27 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitzchrisstankev...@yahoo.com wrote:
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each package with the
locally compiled port?
portmaster -f -a
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
Be prepared to answer
Chris == Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@yahoo.com writes:
Chris Be prepared to answer hundreds of options questions. To take the
default option you must press TAB, ENTER to each query. Have fun!
Chris Chris
Chris TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB,
Chris
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com wrote:
Chris Be prepared to answer hundreds of options
questions. To take the default option you must press
TAB, ENTER to each query. Have fun!
I just hit the letter O for OK.
Randal,
Thank you, pressing O is indeed easier than
Chris == Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@yahoo.com writes:
Chris Thank you, pressing O is indeed easier than TAB, ENTER.
Chris Unfortunately, I already pressed TAB, ENTER about a hundred
Chris times. The build is now going. Hopefully any extra TAB, ENTER
Chris sequences I made will be
Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Once ports or packages are installed,
there is no
differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my
'pkg_add' installed packages using ports and eventually
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
However, your comment seems to be in disagreement with online
warnings of do not mix 'pkg_add' packages with 'make' ports.
My original
openldap.
How do you maintain other ports, like dependencies?
Peter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
/include or Mesa headers not found
Check the file
/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.6_OSE/configure.log
for detailed error information.
=== Script configure failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to v...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the
/usr/ports
Hello
Due to my unsolved problem with openldap24-server 2.4.22 port
I would like to know of ot is possible to move backward the ports tree
in order to reuse the 2.4.21 version.
The machine is dedicated to LDAP service so it won't hurt
anything else :-)
Thanks
F
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:49:38AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Due to my unsolved problem with openldap24-server 2.4.22 port
I would like to know of ot is possible to move backward the ports tree
in order to reuse the 2.4.21 version.
ports-mgmt/portdowngrade is likely what you
ok thanks a lot
On 06/29/2010 12:14 PM, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:49:38AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Due to my unsolved problem with openldap24-server 2.4.22 port
I would like to know of ot is possible to move backward the ports tree
in order to reuse the 2.4.21
On 29-6-2010 13:19, Frank Bonnet wrote:
ok thanks a lot
I noticed in an earlier post that you manually upgrade openldap.
How do you maintain other ports, like dependencies?
Peter
--
http://www.boosten.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
I've always used cvsup to maintain the ports tree up to date
cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile ( with all options )
On 06/29/2010 01:27 PM, Peter Boosten wrote:
On 29-6-2010 13:19, Frank Bonnet wrote:
ok thanks a lot
I noticed in an earlier post that you manually upgrade openldap.
How do you
On 29 jun 2010, at 13:56, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I've always used cvsup to maintain the ports tree up to date
cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile ( with all options )
Yeah, that takes care of the ports... but do you recompile dependancies
as well?
For instance:
ra% pkg_info -r openldap-sasl-server
BTW the anoncvs.freebsd.org server seems unreachable
from here ( france ) ...
On 06/29/2010 01:27 PM, Peter Boosten wrote:
On 29-6-2010 13:19, Frank Bonnet wrote:
ok thanks a lot
I noticed in an earlier post that you manually upgrade openldap.
How do you maintain other ports, like
substantially, editing
PORTVERSION in the Makefile might work. You will need to do make makesum deinstall
install clean afterward.
--Original Message--
From: Frank Bonnet
Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: move back to preceding ports ?
Sent
PM_SU_VERBOSE, just with
PM_SU_CMD=/usr/local/bin/sudo
I can install without problem packages with
$ portmaster -P -a -x openoffice
But if there is no package available for the port, I got the message (it is an
example) :
= libpng-1.4.3.tar.xz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//.
= /usr
Greetings.
uname -a:
FreeBSD libertas.local.camdensoftware.com 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE
#1: Thu Jun 24 13:38:09 PDT 2010
sterl...@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
As of a portsnap fetch update this morning, the gegl port will not build
support
cd /user/ports/graphics/gegl make WITHOUT_FFMPEG=yes config
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
.
Known problem?
reconfigure graphics/gegl whit out ffmpeg support
cd /user/ports/graphics/gegl make WITHOUT_FFMPEG=yes config
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Hi,
On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use PORTMASTER tool
to upgrade my ports via packages only.
Then I added the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc
file, and re-opened user's session :
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.fr.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD
Hi,
On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use PORTMASTER tool
to upgrade my ports via packages only.
Then I added the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc
file, and re-opened user's session :
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.fr.freebsd.org/pub
On 06/24/10 06:10, b. f. wrote:
Hi,
On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use
PORTMASTER tool to upgrade my ports via packages only. Then I added
the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc file,
and re-opened user's session : setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp
I'm about to upgrade my ports, since it's over 3 months since the last
upgrade I'm expecting this to be a mega upgrade. In preparation for
this I've run portmaster -na to get all the configs up to date and
avoid the need for frequent manual intervention when I run the upgrade.
This highlighted
thanks for helping me.
i have reinstalled kde4 and i installed.Everything is fine now :)
thanks again for helping me..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
Why do you want to do that ?
Packages are in this directory by default : /usr/ports/distfiles/
--- En date de : Jeu 17.6.10, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com a
écrit :
De: Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com
Objet: change kde4 (pkg) to kde4 (ports)
À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:21:53 + (GMT), Alexandre L. axel...@ymail.com
wrote:
Why do you want to do that ?
Packages are in this directory by default : /usr/ports/distfiles/
--- En date de : Jeu 17.6.10, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com a
écrit :
De: Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie
Thank you for correcting me
--- En date de : Ven 18.6.10, Polytropon free...@edvax.de a écrit :
De: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
Objet: Re: Re : change kde4 (pkg) to kde4 (ports)
À: Alexandre L. axel...@ymail.com
Cc: Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date
i didn't understand your answers..
can u give me commands??
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:26:07 +0300, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com
wrote:
i didn't understand your answers..
can u give me commands??
I would try - but I'm not sure I did understand you correctly.
Can you please specify (1) what's your current state and (2)
what you do want to
well,
i have install kde4 with the package system and i want to reinstall it via
the ports system.
because my system will have better perfomance and less hardware
requierements.
the previous time that i had install kde4 via ports it was working fine but
this time with packages it freezes
On Friday 18 June 2010 22:21:30 Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
well,
i have install kde4 with the package system and i want to reinstall it via
the ports system.
because my system will have better perfomance and less hardware
requierements.
the previous time that i had install kde4 via
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:21:30 +0300, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com
wrote:
i know that i can reinstall the packages and install them again as ports but
i don't want to do that,i want to convert the package installiation into
ports installiation.
Okay, I think I basically understand
On Saturday 19 June 2010 01:28:51 Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:21:30 +0300, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com
wrote:
i know that i can reinstall the packages and install them again as ports but
i don't want to do that,i want to convert the package installiation
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:34:25 +1100, Dima Panov flu...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Saturday 19 June 2010 01:28:51 Polytropon wrote:
# cd /usr/ports/x1/kde4
# make
# make deinstall
# make reinstall
Not right. By this way you deinstall metaport only.
Ha - I *thought* something
Hello
Does anyone has ported kolabd to FreeBSD ?
I don't find it in the ports tree
Thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
hello,
i have installed kde4 via the package system.
how can i install the kde4 via ports system without deleting the packages
and then compiling them?
thank you for answering :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Scott Schappell arc...@silvertree.org wrote:
After digging through /usr/ports/UPDATING, I copied all .so.8 and .so.16
libraries to /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg and those ports are
now compiling. I'm assuming that's the approved solution until
. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws
Objet: Re: RESOLVED: Problem upgrading ports - libintl.so.8 not found
À: Scott Schappell arc...@silvertree.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mercredi 16 juin 2010, 12h52
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:41 AM,
Scott Schappell arc...@silvertree.org
wrote:
After
(?) for FreeBSD.
Is anyone is using Fuse-SSHFS and which version : the one from ports or from
the project website ?
I haven't found anything on Google.
Thanks.
Alexandre.
nb : excuse-me for my previous message without object.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
This is a bad idea.
Instead use /etc/libmap.conf or just recompile the ports.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr
. The only way I got the gnupg and ghostscript8-nox11
ports to update was by copying the .8 libraries over from a backup.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
is really not the way to go.
man libmap.conf
--- En date de : Mer 16.6.10, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws a écrit :
De: C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws
Objet: Re: RESOLVED: Problem upgrading ports - libintl.so.8 not found
À: Scott Schappell arc...@silvertree.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
I found a more elegant way of doing this, thanks to google on my 7.3 system. I
added:
ldconfig_paths=/usr/lib/compat /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/local/lib
/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg
to rc.conf and rebooted (I couldn't shutdown to single user then exit as I
don't have physical access at the moment).
I'm trying to upgrade ports and they keep choking. In particular gpg is one of
them:
echo '#!/bin/sh' ./gpg_dearmor
echo ../../g10/gpg2 --no-options --no-greeting \
--no-secmem-warning --batch --dearmor ./gpg_dearmor
chmod 755 ./gpg_dearmor
./gpg_dearmor ./pubring.gpg
On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Scott Schappell wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade ports and they keep choking. In particular gpg is one
of them:
echo '#!/bin/sh' ./gpg_dearmor
echo ../../g10/gpg2 --no-options --no-greeting \
--no-secmem-warning --batch --dearmor ./gpg_dearmor
chmod
always read UPDATING
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Scott Schappell arc...@silvertree.org wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade ports and they keep choking. In particular gpg is one
of them:
...
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.8 not found, required by
libgcrypt.so.16
...
What do I
Eitan Adler writes:
What do I need to do to fix this problem?
20100530:
AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (i.e.: YOU)
AUTHOR: a...@freebsd.org
When doing this, I also had problems with something which led
to a problem with textproc/flex. I have to completely de-install
On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
20100530:
AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (i.e.: YOU)
AUTHOR: a...@freebsd.org
I did do the make clean, make deinstall and make instal clean and it was still
throwing that error. The only way I got the gnupg and ghostscript8-nox11
ports
package and port versions, but I suppose this is handled by port
management tools automagically)
2010/6/10 Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se:
A package is best seen as simply a pre-compiled port, i.e. packages are
built from ports. After it has been installed there is no
difference between
?
The packages are built from the ports tree itself. Therefore if your
ports tree matches the one that is used to build the packages exactly
you will have no problems.
If your ports tree is newer you will have no problems attempting to
upgrade using a port.
However if you want to use packages after you
Hello,
I have a messed up ports index that I cannot clean. I want to uninstall
lang/php5 but it does not seem to uninstall. The same thing goes for
security/php5-hash. I was uninstalling php5 ports in an effort to return
to the php52 ports. So that is how this happened. I ran the pkgdb -F
Hello,
I have a messed up ports index that I cannot clean. I want to
uninstall
lang/php5 but it does not seem to uninstall. The same thing goes for
security/php5-hash. I was uninstalling php5 ports in an effort to
return
to the php52 ports. So that is how this happened. I ran the pkgdb
Hi--
On Jun 11, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
portmaster -o lang/php52 lang/php5
Now I am left with only one item as follows:
php5-mhash-5.2.12_2 needs updating (port has 5.3.2_1)
There is *no* lang/php5-mhash. Only lang/php52-mhash. Should I deinstall and
install?
I have a messed up ports index that I cannot clean. I want to
uninstall
lang/php5 but it does not seem to uninstall. The same thing goes
for
security/php5-hash. I was uninstalling php5 ports in an effort to
return
to the php52 ports. So that is how this happened. I ran the pkgdb
-F
?
If I recall right, mhash is now built-in or emulated in php-5.3; I
think you can simply deinstall it.
Right. My issue is, there isn't a path of /usr/ports/security/php5-mhash
-- only /usr/ports/security/php52-mhash. How can I remove the
security/php5-mhash with a missing directory? I am unable
On Jun 11, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
I meant to say security/php5-mhash and security/php52-mhash. Again,
there is no security/php5-mhash. How can I remove this safely?
pkg_delete -f php5-mhash-5.2.12_2
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
On 6/11/10 6:56 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
Right. My issue is, there isn't a path of /usr/ports/security/php5-mhash
-- only /usr/ports/security/php52-mhash. How can I remove the
security/php5-mhash with a missing directory? I am unable to deinstall.
How does one remove?
pkg_del php5-mhash
there is no security/php5-mhash. How can I remove this safely?
pkg_delete -f php5-mhash-5.2.12_2
corvus-root@/usr/ports/security/php52-mhash: pkg_delete -f
php5-mhash-5.2.12_2
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/php/20060613/mhash.so' doesn't exist
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/include/php/ext
On Jun 11, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
Finally, it's gone. Thank you!
You're most welcome
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
Hi all,
I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
same software (am I right?) so, for instance, if you install gnome
with packages you
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:58:56PM +0200, Antonio Vieiro wrote:
Hi all,
I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
same software
errors
come up.
i have heard that the ports are more stable than portage but with
portage i
didn't have so many errors (actually i can't recall a time when
portage
died)
am i doing sth wrong or ports comes up with many errors??
P.S.: 1 week not i haven't manage to install a graphical
heard that the ports are more stable than portage but with portage i
didn't have so many errors (actually i can't recall a time when portage
died)
am i doing sth wrong or ports comes up with many errors??
P.S.: 1 week not i haven't manage to install a graphical enviroment
thanks in advance
On 06/06/2010 1:11 ?.?., Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
i have FBSD 8.0 i have install the base system plus the bash shell
from the CD.after the installiation of the system i install ports with
portsnap and i update them with portmaster,no error came up,but now i
receive errors from xfce4
On Sunday 06 of June 2010 13:32:56 Manolis Kiagias wrote:
On 06/06/2010 1:11 ?.?., Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
i have FBSD 8.0 i have install the base system plus the bash shell
from the CD.after the installiation of the system i install ports with
portsnap and i update them with portmaster
errors come up.
i have heard that the ports are more stable than portage but with portage i
didn't have so many errors (actually i can't recall a time when portage
died)
am i doing sth wrong or ports comes up with many errors??
Need to specify FBSD version. I had many problems
801 - 900 of 6354 matches
Mail list logo
