Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:26:49 +0200, Coert wrote:
I checked the man page, and the -PP option is indeed what I am looking for.
The -PP option forces packages. Keep in mind that it *may* happen
that there isn't a package for a specific port, or a package uses
the default option
On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:26:49 +0200, Coert wrote:
> I checked the man page, and the -PP option is indeed what I am looking for.
The -PP option forces packages. Keep in mind that it *may* happen
that there isn't a package for a specific port, or a package uses
the default options of a port (see "ma
Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:23:58 +0200, Coert wrote:
First I completed the freebsd-update
Then I ran portupgrade -av
Then I ran portsnap.
It's a bit confusing to me. Why do you first update your installed
ports, then the ports database? I would thing it would make more
sense in
On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:23:58 +0200, Coert wrote:
> First I completed the freebsd-update
> Then I ran portupgrade -av
> Then I ran portsnap.
It's a bit confusing to me. Why do you first update your installed
ports, then the ports database? I would thing it would make more
sense in reverse order, i
Hello all,
Thanks for the awesome OS!
I am a Linux user and I just started using FreeBSD. It is awesome, and
the Handbook as well!
I am following Chapter 24 of the Handbook to update my system.
First I completed the freebsd-update
Then I ran portupgrade -av
Then I ran portsnap.
When I decide
