On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:07:12 +0800
"Zhang Weiwu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
> nice(1) is just what I learned from school; school books are
> often not very practical these days.
> STANDARDS
> The nice utility conforms to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (``POSIX.1'').
>
> HISTORY
> A nice
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:07:12 +0800
"Zhang Weiwu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
> Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko wrote:
>
> >There's more than nice to change priority; for example, check out
> >rtprio(1) and idprio(1). Just FYI.
> >
> GREAT TOOL rtprio(1) is. Now I can run 'rtprio 5 mpg321 *.m
Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko wrote:
There's more than nice to change priority; for example, check out
rtprio(1) and idprio(1). Just FYI.
GREAT TOOL rtprio(1) is. Now I can run 'rtprio 5 mpg321 *.mp3' it produce
very smooth sound. Perhaps rtprio is averagely used even more frequently
than nice(1)
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:28:24 +0100
Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
> Let me guess: You are using [t]csh as your shell, right?
> That has 'nice' as a built-in command with a slightly different syntax
> than /usr/bin/nice (which is what is documented in the nice(1)
> manpage)
Sub
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 01:06:35PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> Erik Trulsson wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:37:51AM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hello. I thought scheduling priority is the kind of absolute priority,
> >>that is only when the higher priority process don't ask for
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:37:51AM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Hello. I thought scheduling priority is the kind of absolute priority, that
is only when the higher priority process don't ask for resource, can the
lower priority process gets resource. If the higher priority p
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:37:51AM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> Hello. I thought scheduling priority is the kind of absolute priority, that
> is only when the higher priority process don't ask for resource, can the
> lower priority process gets resource. If the higher priority process sucks,
> th
Hello. I thought scheduling priority is the kind of absolute priority, that
is only when the higher priority process don't ask for resource, can the
lower priority process gets resource. If the higher priority process sucks,
the lower priority process starvs.
Now I have a old Pentium-mmx 166 bo
