On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
backyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>--- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 30, 2006, at 12:12 PM, backyard wrote:
>>
>> > with HT disabling in FreeBSD is more for the
>> security
>> > issues about a potential ex
Core 2 Duos have the EM64T extensions. Core Duos (Yonah) are a mobile
chip only, not a full line of processors like the Core 2 architecture
(Merom, Conroe, Woodcrest).
I suspect the Core 2 chips do not suffer from the same security
implications as HT-enabled processors. I'm not certain, but I thi
--- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2006, at 12:12 PM, backyard wrote:
>
> > with HT disabling in FreeBSD is more for the
> security
> > issues about a potential exploit whereby one
> process
> > in one pipe can access the priveledged information
> of
>
On Aug 30, 2006, at 12:12 PM, backyard wrote:
with HT disabling in FreeBSD is more for the security
issues about a potential exploit whereby one process
in one pipe can access the priveledged information of
a process in another pipe because the two cores share
one processor cache and thus one c
