subversion among other ports,
then subsequently switch to svn.
This would also work, I would guess, if ports tree is installed by bsdinstall
or sysinstall.
Question arises whether the ports tree as downloaded in tarball by ftp would be
compatible/in sync with portsnap or svn.
If in any doubt
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to fetch
sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then for ports or
also fetch them via svn?
Polytropon responded:
Ports and system sources are
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thomas Mueller
muelle...@insightbb.com wrote:
How do you get the ports tree or svn in that case if not using portsnap?
You use pkg_add (or the youngest newcomer pkg)
--
chs,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Thomas Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to
fetch sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then
for ports or also fetch them via svn?
Polytropon responded:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:15:24 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote:
One question comes up that I didn't think of immediately.
How do you use svn on a fresh install of FreeBSD, no ports yet?
svn/subversion is not part of the base system.
How do you get the ports tree or svn in that case if not
Hi,
I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to fetch
sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then for ports or
also fetch them via svn?
Thanks, Helmut
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to fetch
sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then for ports or
also fetch them via svn?
Ports and system sources are managed independently.
are managed independently. You can
use whatever tool you want.
The question should read: If I need to install svn anyway, is there an
advantage of portsnap over svn to fetch ports.
Note that portsnap might not deliver the most current ports tree
for a given point in time. For short time deltas
then
for ports or also fetch them via svn?
Ports and system sources are managed independently. You can
use whatever tool you want.
The question should read: If I need to install svn anyway, is there an
advantage of portsnap over svn to fetch ports.
As I said, it depends. If you don't
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Currently I'm updating ports and src twice a day so I will keep using
svn for both.
While you certainly can, isn't it a bit excessive to update so frequently?
Remember, it's not just fetching the sources and ports, you must
C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de
wrote:
Currently I'm updating ports and src twice a day so I will keep
using svn for both.
While you certainly can, isn't it a bit excessive to update so
frequently? Remember, it's not just fetching the
11 matches
Mail list logo
