On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:24:41 +0100
Christian Hansen m...@christianhansen.name articulated:
did you read:
/usr/ports/UPDATING
20100205 and 20090719
I think that would help you.
Been there, done that. Problems still existed. I checked on other
forums and observed other users with similar
That handbook section is where I read:
The default is to update the source code, the entire base
system, and the kernel.
First, freebsd-update tool sync the source.
And in fact much of the /usr/src/ does contain source
code.
/usr/src/sys/ subdirectories seem populated, and some
Please read the handbook section related to the FreeBSD update tool
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
freebsd-update is a binary update tool, so you haven't got anything to rebuild,
except your custom kernel (if you are using one
On 2010-03-14 05:39, Alexandre L. wrote:
Please read the handbook section related to the FreeBSD update tool
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
freebsd-update is a binary update tool, so you haven't got anything to rebuild,
except
I have tried everything in the UPDATING file; however, I am still
unable to get 'kdelibs3' updated. It always ends with this error
message:
Making all in dnssd
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.10/dnssd'
../kdecore/kconfig_compiler/kconfig_compiler
Hello,
I have been using freebsd-update to update several 7.1 systems.
The default freebsd-update.conf contains:
Components src world kernel
Recently while trying to build sendmail to enable SASL I ran into errors:
host# cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail
host# make depend
make: don't know how
On Mar 13, 2010, at 7:37 PM, johnea wrote:
I have been using freebsd-update to update several 7.1 systems.
[ ... ]
How can I build the source updated by freebsd-update?
freebsd-update provides a binary update mechanism.
It doesn't do anything to update the source files; if you choose
On 2010-03-13 19:58, Chuck Swiger wrote:
freebsd-update provides a binary update mechanism.
It doesn't do anything to update the source files; if you choose to rebuild
from source, use cvsup/csup/svn; you will normally get a -STABLE system from
the build cycle, and not a -RELEASE system
On Mar 13, 2010, at 8:10 PM, johnea wrote:
guess I was lead to believe that it updated the source from this entry in
the handbook:
The default is to update the source code, the entire base system, and the
kernel.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
Sorry for the delay. Medical problem.
Here's what I know.
1) Under FreeBSD 8.x OBJC APPEARS NOT to use garbage collection. I
looked at the source and the GC routines aren't defined anywhere and I
stepped through the assembly language and the allocation routing call
malloc(). There is a
Hi !
I have a question about using freebsd-update IDS command.
what is the correct way to specify 'the known good index of the
installed release' ?
I would like to compare an installed system with the(its) original
released CD.
Thanks
d
Ref:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query
daniele gl...@live.com writes:
Hi !
I have a question about using freebsd-update IDS command.
what is the correct way to specify 'the known good index of the
installed release' ?
I would like to compare an installed system with the(its) original
released CD.
Although not an avid freebsd
and kernel on this system is a 5 hour process, I would very much
like to use freebsd-update and I wanted someone to clarify the
utility's behaviour. If I run freebsd-update on this system, what will
it do when it detects that the bootloader binaries do not match those
of stock 8.0-RELEASE? Will it:
1
then
that, the system is using stock 8.0 binaries. Since fully rebuilding
world and kernel on this system is a 5 hour process, I would very much
like to use freebsd-update and I wanted someone to clarify the
utility's behaviour. If I run freebsd-update on this system, what will
it do when it detects
then
that, the system is using stock 8.0 binaries. Since fully rebuilding
world and kernel on this system is a 5 hour process, I would very much
like to use freebsd-update and I wanted someone to clarify the
utility's behaviour. If I run freebsd-update on this system, what will
it do when it detects
Can anyone shed light on this?
I don't want to run kerberos...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 2/23/10 8:23 AM, Steven Friedrich wrote:
Can anyone shed light on this?
I don't want to run kerberos...
I think you posted this on the freebsd-ports list, and Gary Jennejohn
provided the following reply, have you tried?
On 2/10/10 11:59 AM, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Run make config
Seems to be exactly what I'm looking for, thank you very much!
Best regards
Andreas
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason jhelf...@e-e.com wrote:
I have not built on 8.0, however the update code should work just fine on a
custom kernel. The article I wrote is for amd64.
I am doing
On 16 February 2010 18:22, Steve Franks bahamasfra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Peter Kirk pete...@korbitec.com wrote:
Updating freebsd 7.2 to 8 and fan the following command
freebsd-update upgrade -r 8.0-RELEASE
Everything goes through fine but then it gets
Updating freebsd 7.2 to 8 and fan the following command
freebsd-update upgrade -r 8.0-RELEASE
Everything goes through fine but then it gets to a point and its says
The following file could not be merged automatically: /etc/amd.map
Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts
Hello,
I have a need to ship updates to a customized freebsd install, and thought
that freebsd-update could serve me. However
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/projects/freebsd-update-server/ is
rather old and misses amd64 builds. There must be newer code around since
freebsd-update can
Updating freebsd 7.2 to 8 and fan the following command
freebsd-update upgrade -r 8.0-RELEASE
Everything goes through fine but then it gets to a point and its says
The following file could not be merged automatically: /etc/amd.map
Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts
I have not built on 8.0, however the update code should work just fine on a
custom kernel. The article I wrote is for amd64.
I am doing that myself, and I have written an article on it. It is also
pending a commit to the FreeBSD Documentation Project.
http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/OS
Search the list archives for emails pertaining to mergemaster.rc - it
worked wonders for me!
Steve
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Peter Kirk pete...@korbitec.com wrote:
Updating freebsd 7.2 to 8 and fan the following command
freebsd-update upgrade -r 8.0-RELEASE
Everything goes through
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Since the update of SpamAssassin to 3.3.0, spamd doesn't start anymore and
exits with an error:
child process [x] exited or timed out without signaling production of a
PID file: exit 25 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2544.
It seems
Hi,
Since the update of SpamAssassin to 3.3.0, spamd doesn't start anymore
and exits with an error:
child process [x] exited or timed out without signaling production of
a PID file: exit 25 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2544.
It seems that after the upgrade, sa-update has to be run
...if is doesn't work???
It is not the first time and I think the last too but I have a question
anywhere:
The problem is jpeg 8.0 which need to update many ports. It is not a problem
if works. But if doesn't which is my case that is a problem. As I sent a
previous mails about problem
...if is doesn't work???
It is not the first time and I think the last too but I have a question
anywhere:
The problem is jpeg 8.0 which need to update many ports. It is not a problem
if works. But if doesn't which is my case that is a problem. As I sent a
previous mails about problem to rebuilt
On 01/25/10 06:35, Alexandre L. wrote:
You could read /usr/ports/UPDATING because there is section for policikit and
polkit.
--- En date de : Ven 22.1.10, O. Hartmannohart...@zedat..fu-berlin.de a
écrit :
De: O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Objet: polkit-0.95_3: update fails
À
You could read /usr/ports/UPDATING because there is section for policikit and
polkit.
--- En date de : Ven 22.1.10, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat..fu-berlin.de a
écrit :
De: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Objet: polkit-0.95_3: update fails
À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-po
and it worked for me:
portmaster sysutils/policykit sysutils/polkit
Of course, make sure that you update your ports tree FIRST, since there
apparently was a docbook-related issue in the early stages that was
fixed recently. Also, there is a new version of portmaster out as of
yesterday so update your
I try to update ports via 'portmaster -av' on a regular basis and ran
into a sticky problem with poolkit and docbook I'm incapable to solve.
Error message follows.
Does anybody has any hint or tip? Please email me in CC.
Regards,
Oliver
=== Starting build for for ports that need updating
Hello,
Forgive cross posting, i have an unusable system and an not sure where to post.
This follows up a more lengthy post, but i've got some new info so again.
libxul requiers libiconv
libiconv requires libxul
i have WITH_GECKO=libxul in make.conf
i'm using FreeBSD 8.0-stable.
thanks.
ken
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:45:35PM +0600, keneasson wrote:
Hello,
Forgive cross posting, i have an unusable system and an not sure where to
post.
This follows up a more lengthy post, but i've got some new info so again.
libxul requiers libiconv
libiconv requires libxul
libiconv does
On 1/12/10, Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:45:35PM +0600, keneasson wrote:
Hello,
Forgive cross posting, i have an unusable system and an not sure where to
post.
This follows up a more lengthy post, but i've got some new info so again.
of installed ports for available updates
===gt;gt;gt; Checking ports for recursive 'make config'
===gt;gt;gt; Launching child to update glib-2.22.3 to glib-2.22.4
===gt;gt;gt; Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/glib20
===gt;gt;gt; Launching 'make checksum' for devel/glib20 in background
===gt;gt;gt
On 1/12/10, keneasson keneas...@zoho.com wrote:
Hi thanks for the reply.
I'm worried that changing WITH_GECKO will try and rebuild firefox2 which is
marked IGNORE. It took me a long time to get that resolved.
Here is a bit of my portmaster -a log, it's pretty clear that there is a
on file: /usr/local/bin/intltool-extract -
found
===gt; libxul-1.9.0.17 depends on executable: pkg-config - found
===gt; libxul-1.9.0.17 depends on executable: update-desktop-database - found
===gt; libxul-1.9.0.17 depends on shared library: dbus-glib-1.2 - found
===gt; libxul-1.9.0.17
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:29 PM, keneasson keneas...@zoho.com wrote:
I did a pkg_delete for both libiconv and libxul in the hope that this would
clear any stale depends from firefox2 days causing me these problems.
:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 03:47:51PM +, Marwan Sultan thus spake:
This is a lesson for me and everyone to never run freebsd-update on a custom
kernel
I run FreeBSD on a custom kernel, and do binary updates. However, I can do
this because I run my own update server. So all kernels
On 1/9/2010 11:41 AM, PJ wrote:
On 1/9/2010 4:34 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
PJ wrote:
Upgraded to 8.0 without problem.
Reinstalling ports was tedious... but NP for most part.
Sommehow the installation of apache22 stumbled over some configuration
issues, I think
I found that
Dear Sirs,
on a very 'production'-sensitive box I get an error whenever I try to
install any qt4-related application or library. After deinstalling every
qt4-lib/-app, and deleting every /usr/local/*/qt4 directory, I'm
incapable of installing anything related to Qt4, even qt4-corelib fails.
-opensource-src-4.5.3/src/tools/bootstr
ap. *** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-corelib.
According to this log, your system uses qmake from qt33 package, not qmake-qt4,
so your system is polluted. At first, please update your
List,
Is there a program for BSD/linux which will walk a directory tree and
create/update the Windows, 'thumbs.db' files? Something quite the
opposite of vinetto.
I was thinking of doing this on one of our media servers. I'd put said
command in a cron job. Network clients would have faster
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Neil Short nesh...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am suddenly running into the same problem. I was running Firefox
2.0... and when I right-clicked an image and selected save as the
program segment-faulted. I upgraded to firefox-3.0.16_1,1. Same
issue. I'm guessing
I am suddenly running into the same problem. I was running Firefox 2.0... and
when I right-clicked an image and selected save as the program
segment-faulted. I upgraded to firefox-3.0.16_1,1. Same issue. I'm guessing
it's related to some other port that got updated along the way.
Data:
FreeBSD
Hello FreeBSD people.
i'm on FreeBSD 7.2-R p4
I just applied :
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
with no problems
After i restarted the server
i lost my ssh connection, server went down!
I have contacted the hosting company, and after investigation
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:31:13 +, Marwan Sultan dead_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
i'm on FreeBSD 7.2-R p4
I just applied :
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
with no problems
Later you mentioned that you run a custom kernel,
especially for inclusion of quota. When using the
freebsd
Hi Poly,
Its very short story,
my system is on FreeBSD 7.2- P4
and everything works great. Yes I have custom kernel, mainly for quotas.
I have run freebsd-update fetch and install, I forgot its only for generic
kernel.
However, after the freebsd-update fetch/install done, i
error? The setting in rc.conf
is defaultrouter=... - routeR.
But eventho it shouldnot touch rc.conf right?
Correct. The rc.conf file is one of the few ones that
shouldn't be in the scope of freebsd-update or mergemaster
(if you update by source).
my rc.local now has
route add default 66
will today use the ordiary freebsd update (csup) and see if this will fix
what
freebsd-update broke- and will update this list.
This is a lesson for me and everyone to never run freebsd-update on a custom
kernel
system, however It shouldnot produce such problem. (i think)
Thank you
ajtiM wrote:
I did portsnap fetch update and I have in /usr/ports/editors/koffice-kde4
now. I thought that is version 2.1 but it is 1.6 still...
I did check http://www.freshports.org/ but there are no koffice-kde4 and
search also didn't find it. Is it something wrong on my system (FreeBSD 8.0
I did portsnap fetch update and I have in /usr/ports/editors/koffice-kde4
now. I thought that is version 2.1 but it is 1.6 still...
I did check http://www.freshports.org/ but there are no koffice-kde4 and
search also didn't find it. Is it something wrong on my system (FreeBSD 8.0
* Matthew Seaman schrieb:
Alex Huth wrote:
Yes. If you want to track one of the development branches (HEAD, RELENG_N)
then you have to update sources by csup(1) or various other mechanisms and
then compile your kernel+world yourself.
Alternatively you can track release branches
2009/12/8 Alex Huth a.h...@tmr.net:
* Matthew Seaman schrieb:
Alex Huth wrote:
Yes. If you want to track one of the development branches (HEAD, RELENG_N)
then you have to update sources by csup(1) or various other mechanisms and
then compile your kernel+world yourself.
Alternatively you
i've read the manual section, and there's really not much informations
on this.
i've looked into /usr/src/Makefile and Makefile.incl i've seen there are
options to update /usr/src using svn (wich would be my preferred option)
or cvs, but i haven't been able to configure it in any way.
i
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:23:51 +0100
ocean ocean_i...@yahoo.it wrote:
i think i've also found an unexpected behaviour in make buildworld,
i've put src.conf and makefile.conf in /etc/
CPUTYPE?=pentium-m
CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
You don't normally set CFLAGS in FreeBSD, it's
then?
Next question is if i don't get updates with freebsd-update when i have
a stable version? I have the problem with two machines (6.3 and 6.4). On both
i do not get the public key because it is not available on the remote server.
I have test it with debug.
thx
Alex
that you aren't seeing your version reported as 6.4-STABLE indicates
something went wrong with your upgrade process and you haven't actually booted
your system from an updated kernel.
Next question is if i don't get updates with freebsd-update when i have
a stable version? I have the problem
* Matthew Seaman schrieb:
Next question is if i don't get updates with freebsd-update when i have
a stable version? I have the problem with two machines (6.3 and 6.4). On
both
i do not get the public key because it is not available on the remote
server.
I have test it with debug
Alex Huth wrote:
* Matthew Seaman schrieb:
Next question is if i don't get updates with freebsd-update when i have
a stable version? I have the problem with two machines (6.3 and 6.4). On
both
i do not get the public key because it is not available on the remote
server.
I have test
this?
Thank's in advance for any advice.
2009/11/27 S4mmael s4mm...@gmail.com:
Thank you.
2009/11/26 Alexandre L. axel...@ymail.com:
Hi,
I paste this link where Colin Percival explain who to use the tool
freebsd-update with custom kernel. But I think that same thing as been
written
Hi List;
portupgrade mpfr
--- Upgrading 'mpfr-2.4.1_1' to 'mpfr-2.4.2' (math/mpfr)
--- Building '/usr/ports/math/mpfr'
=== Cleaning for mpfr-2.4.2
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
= mpfr-2.4.2.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/mpfr.
= Attempting to
Hi maillist.
After applying non kernel-level patch set via freebsd-update my system after
rebooting show FreeBSD 8.0 version, not 8.0-p1. New instance of freebsd-update
check system again by checksum and show that system is already patched as -p1.
With updating i see changing of file
Ladies and Gentlemen,
This is the first time I have tried to upgrade FreeBSD's source code,
and I have done something wrong, but I am not sure what. I am
upgrading from 6.2 to 8.0.
First, I upgraded the source code, using csup /root/supfile.
Here are the contents of /root/supfile.
#
Jay Hall writes:
This is the first time I have tried to upgrade FreeBSD's source
code, and I have done something wrong, but I am not sure what. I
am upgrading from 6.2 to 8.0.
Have you read the Handbook entry on upgrading system source?
Robert
/src
# make update
if you put the following into /etc/make.conf:
SUP_UPDATE= yes
SUP=/usr/bin/csup
SUPFLAGS= -L2
SUPHOST=cvsupN.XX.freebsd.org
SUPFILE=/usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
PORTSSUPFILE= /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile
I just finished a forced rebuild of all my ports, but the crashes
persist.
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:29 +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:44:00AM -0500, Curly Brace wrote:
Hi all, I'm on 8.0/amd64, and my GNOME 2.28 update went off with no
problems, but now Firefox 3.5
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:44:00AM -0500, Curly Brace wrote:
Hi all, I'm on 8.0/amd64, and my GNOME 2.28 update went off with no
problems, but now Firefox 3.5 and Epiphany 2.28 crash when visiting
certain pages, such as the Welcome to firefox first-start page.
Firefox leaves Segmentation fault
/ports/print/cups-base.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base.
=== make failed for print/cups-base
=== Aborting update
=== Update for cups-base-1.3.10_4 failed
=== Aborting update
Configuration of cups-base is with all but debugging options set,
disabling all configurational
Hi all, I'm on 8.0/amd64, and my GNOME 2.28 update went off with no
problems, but now Firefox 3.5 and Epiphany 2.28 crash when visiting
certain pages, such as the Welcome to firefox first-start page.
Firefox leaves Segmentation fault (core dump) in the console when it
crashes, and Epiphany
Hi all!
I've got a problem while upgrading FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 - FreeBSD
8.0-RELESE with freebsd-update(8).
First of all I made a copy of the most configuration files. Then I made:
# freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade
All went good, except the message, that because of MYKERNEL kernel
On Thursday 26 November 2009 14:32:01 S4mmael wrote:
Hi all!
I've got a problem while upgrading FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 - FreeBSD
8.0-RELESE with freebsd-update(8).
First of all I made a copy of the most configuration files. Then I made:
# freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade
All went
Hi,
I paste this link where Colin Percival explain who to use the tool
freebsd-update with custom kernel. But I think that same thing as been written
in the handbook.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=30920postcount=9
--- En date de : Jeu 26.11.09, S4mmael s4mm...@gmail.com a écrit
I just updated to 8.0-RELEASE with freebsd-update.
I ran:
# freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade
merge config files
# freebsd-update install
I was told to reboot and run freebsd-update install again to complete the
process.
I rebooted into single user mode, mounted /usr and /var and somehow
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:49:44 +, cali clarke xorquew...@googlemail.com
wrote:
What's the quickest and cleanest way out of this mess?
You can install the base system from the FreeBSD 8.0-RC
CD-ROM. This should give you a working system again.
Keep an eye on NOT formatting anything.
Using a
The installer eventually worked on the sixth attempt (I had to use the CD
to load the kernel and then yank the CD out amongst streams of
READ_TIMED_OUT errors).
May have made things worse, however.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 16/11/09 Polytropon said:
Your PS1 seems to include ${SHORT_PWD}, a variable. It seems
that it is not updated immediately after the cd command.
Yeah, looks like it. Works on linux though...
By the way, this is bash-3.2.25 on FreeBSD/x86 7.
bash-4.0.33_2 on x86 6.3.
Is this what you've
, the prompt with my current location doesn't update until the
command _following_ my directory change.
r...@kanga:/root$ echo $PS1
\[\033[1;32m\]\[\033[0;36m\]\u\[\033[1;32...@\[\033[0;36m\]\h\[\033[1;32m\]:\[\033[0;37m\]${SHORT_PWD}\[\033[1;32m\]$\[\033[0;37m\]
I'm wondering if this is a bash bug
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:14:25 -0500, Michael P. Soulier
msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
\[\033[1;32m\]\[\033[0;36m\]\u\[\033[1;32...@\[\033[0;36m\]\h\[\033[1;32m\]:\[\033[0;37m\]${SHORT_PWD}\[\033[1;32m\]$\[\033[0;37m\]
I'm wondering if this is a bash bug on bsd, or if I'm doing something
On Wed 2009-11-11 12:35:55 UTC-0600, Jason Fried (r...@churchofbsd.org) wrote:
I have a fairly old install and not much room on my ROOT is there a way to
prevent freebsd-update from installing .symbols files.
In /etc/freebsd-update.conf:
IgnorePaths /boot/kernel/*.symbols
From reading
I have a fairly old install and not much room on my ROOT is there a way to
prevent freebsd-update from installing .symbols files.
Thanks,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Thanks to all
--
Guy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
It keeps repeating this line in original terminal, putting line .. in
between. So it looks like this:
Protocol not supported by server.
..
Protocol not supported by server.
..
Protocol not supported by server.
..
goes on like this
Now I have to start just 'Xorg', it starts bare X. And from
Yuri wrote:
It keeps repeating this line in original terminal, putting line .. in
between. So it looks like this:
Protocol not supported by server.
..
Protocol not supported by server.
..
Protocol not supported by server.
..
goes on like this
Now I have to start just 'Xorg', it starts
. There are several ways of
updating the system, from precompiled binaries or by recompiling the
system and the ports (and using csup, portsnap, portupgrade ...).
I would prefer to use the first way because it is really faster, but it
seems to me that when I want to update my jails, there is no other easy
way
.
There is a point I don't fully understand. There are several ways of
updating the system, from precompiled binaries or by recompiling the
system and the ports (and using csup, portsnap, portupgrade ...).
To update your base system, you can use freebsd-update. This uses
precompiled binaries and also updates
understand. There are several ways of
updating the system, from precompiled binaries or by recompiling the
system and the ports (and using csup, portsnap, portupgrade ...).
I would prefer to use the first way because it is really faster, but it
seems to me that when I want to update my jails
freebsd-update works fine in a jail so long as you symlink the kernel
file to /dev/null
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Guy Marcenac wrote:
Hi,
I am an old debian user and I am looking at freebsd for security reasons
* I am very interested in the jail concept
* I have to relearn iptables syntax
On 10/31/09, phantomcircuit phantomcirc...@covertinferno.org wrote:
freebsd-update works fine in a jail so long as you symlink the kernel
file to /dev/null
I've never needed to do that. I run lots of jails and i just run
freebsd-update like normal. I don't install the kern sets in the jails
Whether there is a method of reception of the list of the releases
accessible to updating through freebsd-update(8)? For example, if open
http://update5.freebsd.org catalogs to-N.M-RELEASE\* are visible -
where it is possible to be updated. But it well thanking for Indexes
options on the WEB
steps or is this the wrong rabbit
hole?
- Is this more likely a bug (xorg-server from 7-STABLE shouldn't break ABI with
7.2-RELEASE) or operator error (missing or incorrect update step)?
- I would prefer to maintain my system using pre-compiled packages only. Is
that feasible, and if so does it come
Matthias Fechner wrote:
Hi Michael,
Michael Powell schrieb:
patch I got. I use cvsup11 because it closest to me (in the Verizon
datacenter in Ashland, Va.) but I have had that server go stale before.
Might try csupping ports again from something a little higher up in the
hierarchy.
why
Michael Powell wrote:
Jerry wrote:
[snip]
No problems on my machines.
PHP 5.2.11 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: Sep 24 2009 19:08:59)
Copyright (c) 1997-2009 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2009 Zend Technologies
[snip]
Will look into it a little more
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:03:37 -0400
Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Found the problem. The mailheader patch for 5.2.10 clashes with the
Suhosin patch for 5.2.11. I rebuilt PHP with Suhosin and without
mailheader patch and now it's all happy again. Now my php -v reads
like Jerry's.
Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:03:37 -0400
Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Found the problem. The mailheader patch for 5.2.10 clashes with the
Suhosin patch for 5.2.11. I rebuilt PHP with Suhosin and without
mailheader patch and now it's all happy again. Now my php -v
Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:03:37 -0400
Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Found the problem. The mailheader patch for 5.2.10 clashes with the
Suhosin patch for 5.2.11. I rebuilt PHP with Suhosin and without
mailheader patch and now it's all happy again. Now my php -v
Today I did a portupgrade of PHP from 5.2.10 to 5.2.11.
This broke both lighttpd and Apache web servers, on which I run PHP as
FastCGI. I do not know if this affects those who use mod_php as I do not use
it. I use mod_fcgid instead.
Execute php -v at a prompt and it will spew the following
Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2009 Zend Technologies
Did you rebuild all of the ports that depend on PHP? I used portmanager
with the '-p' option to update all dependencies.
portmanager -u -l -y -p
That should get everything working.Update you ports system first
however.
--
Jerry
ges
portmanager
with the '-p' option to update all dependencies.
portmanager -u -l -y -p
That should get everything working.Update you ports system first
however.
Ports was updated immediately prior to this. The only thing that depends on
php5 is php5-extensions. I completely removed all PHP and rebuilt
801 - 900 of 2364 matches
Mail list logo
