Re: updating in single-user mode

2005-10-25 Thread Eric F Crist
On Oct 24, 2005, at 11:45 PM, Dimitar Vasilev wrote: I don't reccommend doing installworld or kernel in multiuser, but I have never had any problems doing it on a lightly loaded machine. With that said what could bite you is your new kernel not booting or something broken in userland. You

Re: updating in single-user mode

2005-10-25 Thread John DeStefano
On 10/24/05, Beecher Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 24 October 2005 02:24 pm, John DeStefano wrote: When updating world, section 20.4.5 of the handbook calls for dropping to single user mode. The reasons given for this make sense. But this is a problem for me: my BSD server

Re: updating in single-user mode

2005-10-25 Thread Peter Matulis
--- Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 24, 2005, at 11:45 PM, Dimitar Vasilev wrote: I don't reccommend doing installworld or kernel in multiuser, but I have never had any problems doing it on a lightly loaded machine. With that said what could bite you is your new

Re: updating in single-user mode

2005-10-25 Thread Dimitar Vasilev
If this isn't a production machine, try it. I have been doing system updates since 3.4 and not once have I booted into single user mode to compile my kernel or userland. I've even done it as recently as two weeks ago. I don't have a huge userbase, so my system is pretty quiet.

updating in single-user mode

2005-10-24 Thread John DeStefano
When updating world, section 20.4.5 of the handbook calls for dropping to single user mode. The reasons given for this make sense. But this is a problem for me: my BSD server does not have a local K/V/M setup connected directly to it; it sits on my network and I connect to it via PuTTy for

Re: updating in single-user mode

2005-10-24 Thread Dimitar Vasilev
Is there a way to achieve single-user mode while still being able to connect remotely (via LAN)? (I know that's something of an oximoron, but I needed to ask) And if not, am I losing any serious features/functionality of the update process by _not_ dropping into single user? Serial cable

Re: updating in single-user mode

2005-10-24 Thread Beecher Rintoul
On Monday 24 October 2005 02:24 pm, John DeStefano wrote: When updating world, section 20.4.5 of the handbook calls for dropping to single user mode. The reasons given for this make sense. But this is a problem for me: my BSD server does not have a local K/V/M setup connected directly to it;

Re: updating in single-user mode

2005-10-24 Thread Dimitar Vasilev
I don't reccommend doing installworld or kernel in multiuser, but I have never had any problems doing it on a lightly loaded machine. With that said what could bite you is your new kernel not booting or something broken in userland. You will then need console access (serial or local) to fix