On 2003-03-13 17:46, Anti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:11:48 +0200
>Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> really very, *very*, basic services that a Unix machine should be
>> ready to serve without having to go through tons of ports/packages
>> just to install bind.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:11:48 +0200
Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> really very, *very*, basic services that a Unix machine should be
> ready to serve without having to go through tons of ports/packages
> just to install bind.
why not just have the package install by defaul
On 2003-03-12 10:59, "Jorge Mario G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there
Hello. I see that knowledgeable people have already answered this,
but I'll try to put a little more detail in the lot.
> I've seen that BIND and sendmail (till 4.7-RELEASE havent tested 5.0
> yet) are installed by defau
>> 2. for bill:
>> I dont think there is BIND conde involved in the resolver
OK, BIND has nothing to do with the resolver :-)
>
> Well, we can both think about it, or you could check.
>
>> 3. for peter:
>> I always go with the CUSTOM install
>
> I think he's talking about FreeBSD 5, which I know f
Jorge Mario G. wrote:
Here I try to reply to kirk and all other guys
1. if I want to read my network status is most likely because I have
server?? If I'd have a server Id configure (mail) it how I like it :)
>
2. for bill:
I dont think there is BIND conde involved in the resolver
Well, we can bot
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jorge Mario G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Now I from the sys admin point of view (mine):
> Do I need a DNS server???
> YES, but I usually grab the lastest version, and the default install does
> not suit to our needs...
But it suits a lot of peoples needs.
> Do I need ma
Here I try to reply to kirk and all other guys
1. if I want to read my network status is most likely because I have
server?? If I'd have a server Id configure (mail) it how I like it :)
2. for bill:
I dont think there is BIND conde involved in the resolver
3. for peter:
I always go with the CUS
To my knowledge, the default install does not install either BIND or SENDMAIL
anymore. You have to select those options during the CUSTOM install
process. Unless
you are using the QUICK INSTALL method. Of course, the QUICK INSTALL is
geared to get you started with the basics, so if you don't wa
At 2003-03-12T15:59:03Z, "Jorge Mario G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've seen that BIND and sendmail (till 4.7-RELEASE havent tested 5.0 yet)
> are installed by default my question is simple... WHY?
Because noone's done the work of removing them. Volunteering?
> I see this from a end user p
Jorge Mario G. wrote:
Hi there
I've seen that BIND and sendmail (till 4.7-RELEASE havent tested 5.0 yet)
are installed by default my question is simple... WHY?
Partly for historical reasons.
Also, sendmail and BIND do more than just mail|DNS server.
Sendmail is used by most local mailers for sendin
Hi there
I've seen that BIND and sendmail (till 4.7-RELEASE havent tested 5.0 yet)
are installed by default my question is simple... WHY?
I see this from a end user point of view (mine):
Do I need a name server or DNS "chaching" server???
- Nop, my ISP provides me that
Do I need a my own mailserv
11 matches
Mail list logo